Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

@Adrian Flux fluxed me ! - advice needed.


pluciorx
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

How i have been fluxed!

 

Everything is fine until you say You would like to leave,

 

On 25/05 we have got a new ERS policy over the phone through Adrian Flux and paid 64.40.

They charge non-refundable fee of £100 and my policy cost was £329.36 making this total 429. + 16% making total premium credit finance of £490.

 

On 26/08 I have asked them to cancel the policy due to car being sold after exactly 3 months.

 

To this point we have already paid 64.40 + 47.24 + 47.24 + 47.24 making total of: 206.12

(last DD payment has been taken after policy was cancelled)

 

We have received a message on 04/09 saying that we still owe £96.43.

I immediately called them and asked for explanation how this is possible as we paid already much more, on 14/09

AF answered:

we deducted our commission

and a £25 administration fee, leaving a refund of £154.05

This was set against an outstanding balance of 250.48 with premium credit leaving £96.43 to pay.

 

I asked them for statement of my account as I do not understand and was not aware of any commission to be paid apart from the initial £100, and I was expecting only contractual cancellation fee of £25 as we paid proportionally much more than we have used.

 

 

When I spoke with insurance company they confirmed that they issued a pro-rata refund, which is based on the number of days that your policy was in force.

 

On 18/09 I have explained that this is not in line with what information I have been given when signing a contract and those fees were not explained to me when I was offered insurance, and I would like to make a formal complaint about this and that I’m willing to pay contractual cancellation fee of £25 on top on what I have already paid.

 

On 19/09 after their working hours I have received an email that they are adding additional £35 to the balance for debt recovery agency and now the total balance payable is £131.4,

 

Rang them immediately to get explanation just to be told that they are closed now.

 

Nowhere in Your Documents You are able to actually find out what is the full cost of policy, and what are the real costs.

They did not explain to me how much refund was given by the insurance company and dealt in worst possible outcome with premium Credit by cancelling the credit agreement ( early repayment and refund would be my preffered way to avoid cancellation fees ! )

 

Cancellation cost of £25 is a fiction and new fees like “commission” shows up.

I would like to make a formal complaint on the grounds above, can anyone confirm the best way?

There are plenty better brokers there... Yes, they are not even insurers, just brokers trying to drain You as much as possible, when they find out that You want to cancel policy You took through them.

 

Be warned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read the terms you signed up to when buying the policy. Then make a formal complaint in writing to Adrian Flux head office about anything they are doing that is different to the policy terms.

 

Normally on cancellation, if anything is owed, then they can issue a full breakdown calculation and you can see how they arrived at the amount.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

no cancellation fees nor DCA fees are lawful

they are all unlawful

don't get spoofed

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx, can you confirm that cancellation fees are not lawful?

I am about to cancel my insurance at month 6 because I sold the car and I thought that I would have to pay something to terminate the contract early, similarly to when you change details of something.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cancellation fees are lawful and accepted by the FOS. I don't think anyone has gone to court and won in regard to cancellation fees.

 

Read your policy in regard to cancellation terms. It might not be pro rata, there could be a percentage of premium payable based on months policy has run. Then on top there is a cancellation fee.

 

If you are buying another car, get a change of car quote and compare with new policy quotes.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

things in T&C's can be deemed unlawful

just like bank charges and PPI

they were in T&C's but look at what happened!!

 

cancellation fees are not lawful!!

they are a PENALTY and the FCA have clearly gone down on record as stating such.

 

whatever the FOS deem on individual cases is neither here nor there

 

no no-one has ever gone to court and won them back

but neither have any insurance companies gone to court and won them either.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So British gas are acting unlawfully when they advertise their latest offer on telly and stating their is a cancellation fee if you leave early?

The ads would be pulled instantly

Along with talk talk, plus net, BT EON, Scottish power and hundreds of other company's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

utilities companies would you argue with them they are a priority service

all the rest have and do get challenged

 

 

simply look in the legal successes forum on the number of court claims by DCA's for say phone contracts that they've lost or discontinued

whereby the balance they are after is solely cancellation charges & monthly contracted costs till it end of contract

 

 

nuff said

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...