Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

need help done police interview under caution


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hii

i have been caught in john lewis store for shoplifting of £42

been stopped by security and they had called police was told will be called by one of the colleague

i had a called and been interview under caution was having no idea about that

yesterday had interview but was not aware of all this

i had admitted that i had done it as i did it so dont want to get a penalty

and a note: i had been caught shoplifting before and had paid a penalty as dont want to risk it

but i m being destressed after this so kindly need your help

like how much time for investigate and

what's the result type

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get asked if you wanted legal advice, when you went for interview under caution?

Was the interview under caution at a police station?

If 'yes' to both : did you ask for legal advice?

If you didn't ask for (free) legal advice : why not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you have been caught before you are on their radar. This interview will have been noted and passed up the line for a decision as to what to do next. The store may decide that they arent going to spend any time on the matter and you may well then get a FPN from the police. If the store do want to help with a prosecution you will be arrested and cautioned again and a formal interview will take place. This will be recorded, you can have representation present if you wish and a file created and sent to the CPS for consideration and if they decide a conviction is likely and in the public interest you will be summonsed and taken to court.

If the store isnt bothered about progressing this and the police deem it is too trivial a matter to continue with a record will be added to your existing file and although nothing happens this time you can bet that the next time you fail to pay a bus fare, drop litter or shoplift again it wont be forgiven.

all you can do for the moment is wait, you may get a letter saying things are being dropped or you may be invited to a further interview ( arrest by appointment, police caution or FPN).

We try to give practical advice. That is not the same as sympathy so other than saying the timeframe is unkown but generally no more than a month for such a thing not much to say at this point

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they asked me if you want and yes was at police station

actually i thought that i did it and had confess the crime so guess didnt need after been interview and check details on internet then i came to know all this

i was not been know that's it been interview under caution if so would have checked on net firstly

Link to post
Share on other sites

as you have been caught before you are on their radar. This interview will have been noted and passed up the line for a decision as to what to do next. The store may decide that they arent going to spend any time on the matter and you may well then get a FPN from the police. If the store do want to help with a prosecution you will be arrested and cautioned again and a formal interview will take place. This will be recorded, you can have representation present if you wish and a file created and sent to the CPS for consideration and if they decide a conviction is likely and in the public interest you will be summonsed and taken to court.

If the store isnt bothered about progressing this and the police deem it is too trivial a matter to continue with a record will be added to your existing file and although nothing happens this time you can bet that the next time you fail to pay a bus fare, drop litter or shoplift again it wont be forgiven.

all you can do for the moment is wait, you may get a letter saying things are being dropped or you may be invited to a further interview ( arrest by appointment, police caution or FPN).

We try to give practical advice. That is not the same as sympathy so other than saying the timeframe is unkown but generally no more than a month for such a thing not much to say at this point

 

EB, the OP has had (what sounds like a PACE-compliant) interview under caution, at which they admitted the offence.

I don't know why they would need to be interviewed again unless new offences were being considered.

The store doesn't have much say once the OP admitted the offence at interview.

 

If the police wanted to issue a FPN : they would have done,

So, it probably (not definitely, but probably) has been sent to the CPS for consideration of a prosecution bearing in mind the value and the previous caution.

 

However, the CPS might still pass it back to the police, but I suspect a summons will be the end result : after all they pretty much have a "slam-dunk" with the recorded admission and any testimony from store staff.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...