Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Im guilty of earning money while claiming DWP.


Heisenb3rg
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2403 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you for taking the time to read my problem.

 

For the last two and a half years ive been selling virtual items on ebay whilst claiming DWP.

A week ago I was asked to attend an interview at my local Job Centre, of which I did and was told by the interviewer that I had been informed on for making money and not declaring it.

 

I told the interviewer I had indeed been doing that and he asked me to bring 3 months bank statements in next week.

 

I went home that same day and printed off 3 months bank statements and as I did so the realisation hit me that I was in a lot of trouble.

 

The over payment is around £8.200.00

 

My intensions are to be honest and cooperative from the start, so I will go back to the Job Centre in a few days and hand them the statements.

 

I wont lie to you I am very scared and wish I had never done this, but what I need to know is what should I expect once ive given him those statements?.

what will the process be?.

 

Is there anything I need to know or do to make this go better in my favour?.

 

The DWP im claiming is carers allowance for my partner.

 

I have never done anything like this before and its realy playing on my mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG,

 

Ideally you need to do a ''better off calculation'' to see what, if anything, you MIGHT have been overpaid, and what you CAN earn before they take it into account.

 

Who gave you this figure of 8k?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you complete a proforma regarding outgoings etc as this will all need calculating, it's not just about what you sold but all the add-ons, like packaging and postage etc.

 

I think its a DX788 or something similar, they should have given you one at the interview.

 

Was the interview with compliance or under caution?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Bazooka Boo

 

I myself came to this amount.

I just added up the last two and a half years at £63.00

 

Hello tomtom256

 

The first interview was with compliance.

Thats where they put it to me that someone had informed on me for selling on Ebay.

 

The next interview is where they want me to bring in 3 Months Statements of which i will comply with, as i want to be honest and cooperative.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First and foremost you are not guilty of anything at this moment in time, so that is worth considering.

 

As others have advised you are allowed to earn x amount of money before you need to declare, so the figure that you have worked out as not being declared would and I assume be less than the figure you have calculated for starters.

 

Is selling on E-Bay and making profit classed as earnings or would need to be declared in any event, they are items that are in theory your property and if you make profit on your property as opposed to deliberately working.

 

Other posters on here will be more up on this subject but my initial thinking is that you are fully entitled to make profit from your own personal possesions and whether this shows on your statement I would argue that point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello honeybee13

 

I didnt realy keep track of the amounts like i realy should of.

Some weeks i would make around £40.00 and others i would make around 130.00

 

The items i sold where virtual digital items and i sold them from £0.99 upto £24.99

because there was so many transactions per month i never kept track of the amounts.

 

I feel realy stupid i wont lie to you.

 

Hello spitfire1964

 

Thank you for your reply.

Ive decided tomorrow i will ring round a couple of solicitors that deal in benefit law and see what advice i can get from them.

 

I will keep this thread updated on this matter from start to finish as i hope it will be helpfull to anyone in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its all with compliance they will be no conviction etc from this, they will just want to put the benefit right and either cancel it back and create an overpayment and/or check that you have been receiving it correctly.

 

Can you not get a transaction list from paypal and/or ebay with what was sold etc and then how much it would have cost if anything to create these virtual items and crate a set of books from this?

 

What were the virtual items you have been selling?

 

Was it a business i.e. did or do you have a business account with ebay?

 

Have you paid any necessary taxes to HMRC?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello tomtom256

 

Thanks for your reply.

The items i was selling are virtual items within sertain game worlds,i will try and explain.

The items are rewards for doing sertain things within the game world, you can then send these items to anyone who has the same game via ingame mailbox.

I discovered there was people on ebay making money from this so i decided to try it myself.

 

The ebay account is just a normal account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello marner51

 

This wasnt credit it was Ingame items like Armor/weapons and cosmetic items.

These items allow your character to become more powerful or just look kool ingame.

 

Regarding the total amount i made i have no idea.

 

what i would like to know is when i take those statements down on the 28/09/17 should i say anything to them? , for example they will see that £100 transfared to my bank say on monday and another £110 on wednesday, now i didnt make that money in 3 days by selling on Ebay it may of took about 3 weeks as i would save it up in my paypal then transfare it to my bank.

 

Or do i just take them in and say nothing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is if you say nothing they may just take the whole period of CA back to the start of the claim leaving you with a large overpayment, you actually explain what you have been doing is a hobby etc and the OP may be significantly less as there may be periods were you did not have any income from the selling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Say nothing.

 

Thank you for your reply.

 

The problem is if you say nothing they may just take the whole period of CA back to the start of the claim leaving you with a large overpayment, you actually explain what you have been doing is a hobby etc and the OP may be significantly less as there may be periods were you did not have any income from the selling.

 

Thank you for your reply.

 

Ive decided if asked by the person im handing the statements too that the transfares he is seeing are from money that was saved over a long period in my paypal.Im going to assume at some point down the line they will want to see my paypal account to get an acurate read on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, I didnt have any savings when i applied for carers allowance,

the savings im talking about are from what i would save up in my paypal from sales of my items.

 

i moved £100 that £100 may of taken a couple of weeks to save up,

but on my bank statements they will just see i transfared £100 and they could assume i made that £100 in that day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to clarify, I didnt have any savings when i applied for carers allowance,

the savings im talking about are from what i would save up in my paypal from sales of my items.

 

i moved £100 that £100 may of taken a couple of weeks to save up,

but on my bank statements they will just see i transfared £100 and they could assume i made that £100 in that day.

 

And that is all a DM can do if you do not explain how the money came about, which could be the difference between an OP and still being entitled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And that is all a DM can do if you do not explain how the money came about, which could be the difference between an OP and still being entitled.

 

@tomtom256

 

Can you please be a little clearer and explain what you mean thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A DM (decision maker) would assume that you made £100 that day, UNLESS you explain to them the circumstances, otherwise they will claim they OP (overpaid) you.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to calculate not only what you made in every week that is applicable but also calculate your costs as well. Listing fees, paypal charges etc can all be knocked off the sales receipts to give you a lesser net income.

 

As the amounts will be sporadic try and avoid letting them make assumptions for overall amounts and stick to the week by week amounts. It complicates things but as you will have a weekly, monthly and annual threshold for earnings utilise them to yur advantage rather then let them take teh easyy option.

 

For example, if you make ( say) £1000 in a particular week and £2.00 a week for the rest of the year lumping them together will mean your benefits were possibly overpaid for all 52 weeks by a tenner wheras by separating the amounts you were only overpaid in 1 week.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras
Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to calculate not only what you made in every week that is applicable but also calculate your costs as well. Listing fees, paypal charges etc can all be knocked off the sales receipts to give you a lesser net income.

 

As the amounts will be sporadic try and avoid letting them make assumptions for overall amounts and stick to the week by week amounts. It complicates things but as you will have a weekly, monthly and annual threshold for earnings utilise them to yur advantage rather then let them take teh easyy option.

 

For example, if you make ( say) £1000 in a particular week and £2.00 a week for the rest of the year lumping them together will mean your benefits were possibly overpaid for all 52 weeks by a tenner wheras by separating the amounts you were only overpaid in 1 week.

Yes i understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...