Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Busted & Stupid Coming today to remove goods - CTAX debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2398 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi hoping for some quick advice

 

. I stupidly let them in

signed a controlled goods agreement and I've defaulted.

 

They've issued me with a 're.entry notice giving me the 2 days notice and they will be back today.

Albeit not here yet.

 

My question is can they take goods not on the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

More info needed... What was the debt for etc (Solely because this may affect the advice we can give you)

A CT Liability order will be different to a Consumer Credit Debt - They could potentially take items which are not on the Controlled goods agreement if the amount that they are trying to rcover for isnt reached with the items they had i believe.

 

IE lets say you managed to get a new TV but messed up with your payments and defaulted - They could also include the TV to cover the amount (Extra charges for revisiting etc)

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So its a CT liability order thats been issued?

Beyond this i cant help that much further but ill see if someone else might beable to come along and assist / advise.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Others have more knowledge.

 

Can you list the items shown on the agreement ? If the items are needed to live e.g furniture, do you have other similar items ?

 

I doubt they will come tonight, just in case they need a locksmith, if you did not let them in. Even then they would have to load a van.

 

More likely to visit tomorrow or Monday.

 

If you can make payments to cover the one you missed and say the next one due, phone them to see if you can pay, rather than hassle of another visit to you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi listed is

 

Tele....its knackered worth about a fiver

Wardrobe...would leave me with none

Chest of drawers...wardrobe and chest would fall apart if moved

Microwave

Three piece suite..would leave me nothing to sit on as I have no dining table

Side tables..worthless

Lamp...now broken but still here

 

That's it.

 

Debt is £3100

 

I've just found my council's code of conduct for enforcement officers and it states no goods to be taken without prior agreement from the council. Also states unless goods cover at least 30% of the debt ...mine clearly don't ...then they should not be removed.

 

What are the chances that they do actually abide by the code of conduct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well im sure they cant take the sofa can they? There is a list of stuff somewhere that they arent allowed to take, might be worth searching!

 

The agreement signed is probably not valid, as the items listed should not really be included and the value does not really go towards the amount owed.

 

If they visited, it would be purely to put pressure on you to seek help of a friend or relative to pay your debt. They are unlikely to take the items listed.

 

See this

 

https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/debt-and-money/action-your-creditor-can-take/bailiffs/your-belongings-and-bailiffs/what-goods-can-a-bailiff-take/belongings-a-bailiff-can-take/

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

A bailiff will take any measure required to secure a debt... Especially a Council Tax one but there are rules about what they can and can't take...

 

What was the payment arrangement?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They couldn't take the sofa if it is your only seating.

Yes, they can take the other items if they feel they would sell, but that sounds unlikely.

 

They can however remove goods not listed on the controlled goods agreement if the listed goods are insufficient to clear the debt or more goods are found that can clear more of the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the items will probably be exempt, they must leave sufficient furniture to allow the entire family to sit,

 

beds and bedding they can't have,

along with other household essentials.

 

They can't force you to take off a watch, chain or ring you are wearing,

if jewellery is lying around they can have it away.

 

Busted and Stupor are noted for trying it on and threatening to clear a house including snatching exempt items.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I've just found my council's code of conduct for enforcement officers and it states no goods to be taken without prior agreement from the council. Also states unless goods cover at least 30% of the debt ...mine clearly don't ...then they should not be removed.

 

What are the chances that they do actually abide by the code of conduct?

 

I would suggest that you call the council on Monday and bring the Controlled Goods Agreement to their attention. It may be useful to also send a text message to the individual enforcement agent regarding the local authorities Code of Conduct.

 

Given the size of the debt, the matter of bailiff fees is of limited importance right now. Have you previously had bailiff visits or payment arrangements etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea I have a bad few years with council tax.

It's not for the property I live in I'm up to date with that

 

. I bought my parents house, cheaply I'm far from rich, many years ago.

My dad died 5 years ago leaving it empty

it's taken me this long to get it in a saleable condition

 

as per the rules for council tax on an empty property it went up to 150%

I'm really struggling.

 

I wouldn't mind it's going up for sale next week

Link to post
Share on other sites

The sensible thing for Council to do is to put a charge on your For Sale property (which Bailiffs prob knew nothing about) rather than remove your cr@p furniture.

 

 

Offer that as a solution before the Bailiff's call again.

 

 

They don't like removals as auction price may only realise only 20% of value, still leaving you with balance of debt.

 

I assume your house value is sufficient to clear the debt, even if sold at auction?

 

AFAIK Bailiffs can remove any items listed on the Controlled Goods Agreement that you signed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.

 

 

who do I offer this to

as this is the scenario I am trying to get.

 

 

The bailiff wasn't interested when I tried to explain

said I am liable for the council tax and it didn't matter.

 

Yes it will more than clear the debt and then some.

 

 

Although im hoping for a normal sale rather than it going to auction

 

Also tried speaking to council who say its with the bailiffs now speak to them.

Round in circles

Link to post
Share on other sites

be very careful of people that post here with what, if you weigh up what the majority of posters indicate, gives a totally different appraisal .

that's why the post has now been removed.

 

 

everyone is not necessarily here to help YOU..

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they can't remove things not included on a CGA?

 

The only goods they can actually take away to sell on a revisit are goods they have under their control, unless the find items of value which were previously hidden. But then they would have to go through the process of taking control of these other goods in your house or remove them into safe storage for a period.

 

Why would B&S find goods of value on another visit they had not seen before ? If you have inherited items of value or gotten hold of items of value since, i would suggest you have these removed before a revisit, otherwise yes they would be at risk.

 

Get onto the council first thing Monday morning. If you are using a Solicitors to sell the house and the house has plenty of equity, i am sure the council tax liability can be resolved in a amicable way without too much extra cost being added.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have current or ex bailiffs post comments giving a different view. It is just their view on the matter.

 

Also sometimes the legislation passed by parliament is clear as mud and therefore it is open to interpretation.

 

And you have different opinions on way forward. Hence dx comment to look at what most people are suggesting.

 

Remember that the council owed the money have a responsibility to review ways you have available to settle the liability order. Selling these household goods is a waste of time. As long as you are trying to deal with the matter as best as you can.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see Thankyou.

I've emailed the head of revenues collections requesting he look into placing a charge as an alternative, and explained the goods are all but worthless. Their own code of conduct says the bailiff must obtain prior permission from the council before removing goods for a CT debt so hopefully he won't be able to obtain this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...