Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problem with my landlady


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2408 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

We have just moved to a rented property (2 months now) and the landlady wants to evict us.

She has said that we have deceived her to get into the property,

we are in the property illegally as we have not signed her inventory dated 2012,

 

 

now she is saying that the tenancy agreement was only proposed and now she is saying we have trashed the property and her representative will inspect it and if we do not co-operate they have keys and will enter anyway.

 

 

Also she said it was our responsibility to register our own deposit.

She will not accept phone calls and her letters sent to us are quite nasty and she loves her red pen to underline all the words

 

It was rented through an estate agents,

we have been in contact with them but I think they are scared of her

 

She has never met us and I do not think she has been to the property for a number of years.

 

 

I would like to sue her as she knew before we moved in that we wanted to rent long term and she was more than happy to take our money.

We have no money to move as we put it all into this property.

 

I would like practical and legal advise please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont get legal advice here. Im not qualified.

 

However, can you tell us the exact accusations shes saying? Is there any truth into them. We need much more background.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no truth to her accusations.

The only information I can give is that she said in her letter that we deceived her.

We have damaged the property and

not registered our own deposit and

we have not signed her inventory which she had done in 2012.

 

 

it was rented through an estate agents

all legal and above board and

 

 

the landlady is managing the property herself.

Which is going to be difficult to get any repairs done as she will not talk to us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She or the estate agents are meant to register the deposit. How does she allege you have damaged the property. Why do you say you cant give more info.

 

One other question, and please dont take offence. Are you a british national? I ask this, because there are rogue landlords that hate the fact some nationalities are renting their property. Theres a few of them near where i live that are currently under investigation.

 

As i said before, we need much more info. Such as what exactly is she saying is damaged.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I do not know why my landlady has said we have deceived her, she does not put that information in her letter. I have my own ideas but no proof and yes for something as important as renting a property my husband and I have have been 100% honest, there is no other way. You will get caught out if you are not honest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell her you want to know the exact reasons you are being asked to leave.

 

You also really need to give more info as your posts are making it a pear there's more to all this than you're telling us

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are aware that there are different types of tenancies so what sort did you sign and was the agreement with her directly or via a letting agent? If an AST then 6 months will be the minimum letting period. You have been told that the deposit must be kept via a licenced deposit scheme. If she hasnt done this you can sue her for failing to safeguard the deposit and she may have to pay you up to 3 times the sum in damages.

You say that you refused to sign an inventory dated 2012. Do you at east have a copy of that and did you request that a current one be done on moving in or at least going through the old one with a fine toothed comb to see what is right or wriog with it. Even this old one would ahve given you some proof of the state of things, especially of you made notes ans signed the amendment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, it was an initial 6 month tenancy agreement and it is with the estate agents, we have signed the infantry that the estate agents gave us but we have not seen her infantry, we have not refused to sign hers, we have not had a copy of it. the estate agents also have comments regarding the damage. But she says the infantry the estate agents gave us is not legal. Also she has had the property completely renovated since 2012, which she has not seen as far as i am aware.

 

From speaking to neighbours she has a habit of evicting her tenants for no reason.

Link to post
Share on other sites

she can evict AFTER the initial tenancy if she wants. Also, check that deposit is secured, if not, shes gonna owe you a lot of money.

 

She really sounds like a rogue landlord tbh.

 

Also, please answer previous questions in the thread.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

the inventory done by the agent trumps the old one from 2012 so she is talking out of her hat about that. I suspect that she hasnt bothered to acquaint herslef with any of the information and knowledge she needs to be a successful landlord and so will make your life miserable due to her ignorance. Start looking for somewhere else to live but learn about your rights and her responsibilities before that time so you can leave with a few hundred pounds in your pocket to help with your settling in elsewhere.

answer the questions about the situation and find out if the deposit is protected. If it isnt you acn atart legal action over that whilst you are still there, you just get less compensation

Link to post
Share on other sites

She cannot start eviction proceedings until the original 6 months is up.

 

If you have paid a deposit then she cannot evict you until the deposit has been protected.

 

If the deposit was paid more than 30 days ago then failure to protect it means that you can sue her and win back the deposit plus a sum between 1 and 3 times the deposit.

 

Given her threats you could consider changing the locks. Also make sure you keep copies of the contract in a safe place away from the property. This is in case she comes in and locks you out. If she does this then the Police may wish to see it before they force her to let you back in.

 

Otherwise, consider ignoring her letters. If there is no gas safety and energy certificate you could consider requesting a council inspection. They will issue an improvement notice to fix this and other issues.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...