Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On August 11th we ordered a television from Tesco direct which we picked up on August 14th.

It was fixed to a wall bracket and used without problem until 1st September.

 

On 2nd September the T.V. was switched on and there was a black section to the screen.

 

We called Tesco and they asked us to send in a photo of the screen saying that they would get back to us within 3-4 hours,

they failed to do so and we rang them again to be told that they had not had time to look at our email and that they would call us back shortly after11 am the next day.

 

By 2.30 they still hadn't called and so we contacted them to be told

 

"it looks like accidental damage and so we are not responsible"

 

I tried to explain that there was no way that this could be the case but they refused to budge.

 

I then offered to take the T.V. to a local store with an electrical department so that they could perform a physical check of the item,

they said it wasn't necessary and that their decision stood.

They told me that I should take the set to an accredited repair place and obtain a report.

 

I believe that Tesco are in breach of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and the following extract.

 

The first six months

 

If you discover the fault within the first six months after buying the product,

it is presumed to have been there since the time of purchase - unless the retailer can prove otherwise.

 

During this time, it's up to the retailer to prove that the fault wasn't there when you bought it - it's not up to you to prove that it was.

 

Tesco are adamant that they will not offer anything.

What are my rights?

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you. I have quoted them the relevant sections of the act.

but to no avail.

 

 

How can they hope to prove accidental damage when they have refused point blank to make a physical assessment of the item?

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you written to the head office?

If not, write a letter as soon as possible to HQ and give them 7 days to resolve it before going to CAB or Trading Standards.

 

 

Don't forget to inform them that they are committing a criminal act by ignoring current legislation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

emailed the CEO as soon as they said no. All replies are from there. I will email them again pointing out that they are committing a criminal act. They think that by calling it accidental damage their responsibility has ended.

 

Here is the email conversation starting from the bottom up. Tesco email in blue for ease of reading.

 

Email conversation with Tesco.

 

 

Dear xxxxxxxx

 

Thank you for offering to return the TV to your local store, however this won't be necessary.

 

The next step we would advise is for you to have the TV inspected by an accredited authorised repair agent.

Only if they can provide a report, backed up with evidence to show that this is a manufacturing defect would we be able to pursue this further.

 

Once again thank you for contacting our Chief Executive's office.

 

Kind regards

 

Xxxxxx xxxxxx

Customer Service Executive to the Board

 

As I said we will be issuing proceedings You will also find that we have already cancelled our saver delivery plan and emptied our basket for this weekend.

 

I am still more than willing to take the TV to the electrical department at my local Tesco Express so that they can actually see it.

 

This is the extent of my good will and will be withdrawn at 9pm today

 

 

Dear xxxxxxx

 

Thank you for taking the time to speak with me today.

 

As discussed I’ve spoken with our Technical Support team who have looked at the picture you provided.

 

There are cracks coming in from the left hand side of the screen.

 

 

There’s nothing in this area of the screen that would cause the LCD panel to crack in this way, without some form of external force.

 

We have come to the conclusion that this is accidental damage.

 

I know this will be disappointing for you.

 

Once again thanks for contacting our Chief Executive’s office.

 

Kind regards

 

Xxxxxxx xxxxxx

Customer Service Executive to the Board

 

Our full details were given here

 

On 11th August 2017, I placed an order for a Toshiba television and received it on 14th August 2017.

 

We have discovered that the television has a faulty screen.

I contacted your customer services yesterday (2nd September) who requested that I send a photograph of the screen to you (which I did) and that I would get a call back shortly.

 

Having received no call back we again phoned customer services who informed us that our email had not been dealt with but confirmed that as we had received an automated response it was in progress. At this time we informed the Tesco operative that I am due to go into hospital next weekend for complex surgery and so it is imperative that this is dealt with urgently.

 

We were told that “Macauly” would be in touch after 11am this morning (3rd September), again this did not happen and so again this afternoon we called customer services who have attempted to put us off until tomorrow. This is totally unacceptable due to the simplicity of the issue. A faulty screen will still be faulty and our Consumer rights will not change.

 

During the call this afternoon Mr. Matthews informed your operative that we have now officially rejected the television and under the regulations of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 we demand a refund.

 

To be clear here are our rights under the Act as quoted to your operative.

 

30-day right to reject

 

Under the Consumer Rights Act you have a legal right to reject goods that are of unsatisfactory quality, unfit for purpose or not as described, and get a full refund - as long as you do this quickly.

 

This right is limited to 30 days from the date you buy your product. After 30 days, you will not be legally entitled to a full refund if your item develops a fault, although some sellers may offer you an extended refund period.

 

The first six months

 

If you discover the fault within the first six months after buying the product, it is presumed to have been there since the time of purchase - unless the retailer can prove otherwise.

 

During this time, it's up to the retailer to prove that the fault wasn't there when you bought it - it's not up to you to prove that it was.

 

As these are our rights according to the Act there is NO question that by rejecting the goods due to their unsatisfactory quality a refund MUST be given forthwith.

 

Xxxxx xxxxxx

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report them to Trading Standards. Takes awhile but eventually TS contact the supplier. In the meantime write to the head office and inform them that they are committing a CRIMINAL offence under Section 20 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015.

 

CRIMINAL offence:???:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

CRIMINAL offence:???:

 

It is not civil as the supplier is wilfully disregarding current legislation so it is a criminal offence. I have a case involving rejection currently going against a supplier and have been informed that the supplier is committing a criminal offence as they were ignoring current legislation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see any visual sign of damage to the screen. As far as I am aware pictures can't be posted to here but that would be immaterial anyway.

The onus is on the seller and not the purchaser, and so without Tesco making a physical inspection they are not in a position to make a decision properly.

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can the ball be in my court when Tesco have not seen the television. All they have seen is a photograph. They have refused to let me take it in for a physical inspection. I have attempted to upload a photograph but it can't be done.

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

click upload to post pictures but tO PDF please ONE FILE!

 

there is no criminal offence its a civil one = COUNTY COURT claim.

 

the unit has failed within 30days

you are entitled to a full refund.

 

lets see these cracks or not!!:-D

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

research is the key

there are numerous examples of certain makes of TV cracking once on a wall bracket.

esp if its capable of tilting forward. shifts the centre of gravity and twists the frame.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see what they mean

 

looks like it been pushed back on the top right

or pulled forward from the top left and its bent whrn it hit the way and fractured

 

does it move to tilt left or right on that bracket?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...