Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice Please


Hecuba
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2422 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I received a letter today from HSBC telling me my credit card debit with them for £7,000.13 has been sold to Cabot Financial UK.

Cabot Financial also sent me a letter informing me a CCJ was obtained by HSBC from me.

Cabot Financial inform me I can continue the £10 a month payment but they are asking me to contact them.

I certainly won't be ringing them!

 

HSBC is a credit card debt and I know the CCJ was obtained over 6 years ago.

I have been paying HSBC £10 a month for the last five years.

 

My other credit card debts are also over 6 years old and are

Lloyds Bank £10,000;

Egg £4,800;

Capital One £4,000.

 

 

have been paying £10 a month to Lloyds;

£10 a month to Lowells who are DCA for Egg and

£10 a month to Robinson Way who are the DCA for Capital One.

 

 

have been paying £10 a month to each of these companies for just over 5 years now.

 

have searched Trust Online and discovered there are no current CCJ's but I know this is because the 2 CCJ's which I believe I have are over 6 years old.

 

am wondering should I send a CCA request letter to

Cabot Financial;

Lloyds Bank;

Egg and

Capital One?

 

 

I am concerned Cabot Financial might try to force me to increase my payments given they now own the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the £10 a month was agreed thriugh the courts they cant increase the payemnt without going back to court.

 

 

Should they do that and the court decides the amount will stay at £10 then they pay your costs as well as the court fees so they wont be going there if they can help it.

 

 

What they will try is to get you to agree to pay more thus rendering the court order redundant.

So, the simpe thing to do is pay them the tenner as per their instructions and do not enter into any correspondence.

 

The CCJ's will be live becuase you have kept to their terms, they just wont appear on your credit files because you have been good.

That means should you have ideas about stopping that payment because you cant see the debt

it will give them a reason to go after you big time.

 

By all means CCA the other loans and cards.

If they cant comply within 12 days you stop paying them

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ericsbrother, many thanks for your prompt reply. HSBC didn't enforce the CCJ

- meaning they didn't demand I pay £10 a month.

 

I voluntarily offered to pay this amount because it was the maximum I could afford.

 

I've been paying £10 a month to HSBC for over 5 years now.

will continue paying the £10 a month and won't enter into any correspondence with Cabot.

 

I certainly don't want to give Cabots any reason to increase my monthly repayment will continue paying the £10 a month via HSBC.

 

Also will continue with the £10 a month for each of the other credit card debts since I can't find paperwork showing which credit card company owns the CCJ.

 

Will do a thorough search to find the CCJ's paperwork before sending any CCA's

because I don't want to give these DCA's/banks opportunity to go after me.

 

thanks again for your excellent advice and swift response.

 

Hecuba

Link to post
Share on other sites

id be sending a CCA request to all the people you PAY.

not the original creditors

inc the CCJ ones.

 

 

so HSBC took you to court but never got the CCJ but dropped the case as you entered into an agreement? wasn't a tomlin order was it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

when you say didnt enforce the CCJ

what did the CCJ actually order?

full payment?

payment at £x per month ?

 

 

or as DX says a Tomlin order ( basically a binding confidential agreement)

 

Many people use the CCJ acronym when they mean a court claim.

 

 

From what you say it appears as though you didnt defend a claim form HSBC so you will need to know what the order was

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...