Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Opus chasing bill for non existant company at our business address **RESOLVED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2414 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi , I haven't sent them an account dispute letter ..I merely wrote on their letter that the account is in dispute ( as it doesn't exist).

 

The threat that Opus pose is that they will run up a huge bill to issue a warrant which will be for the phantom company they have invented.

 

The disruption that could cause is huge and leave us exposed to further break ins from courts for a company that doesn't exist.

 

Opus have also been trying to find out our correct name ....presumably to change their paperwork accordingly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the company doesn't exist at that address the court will not issue a warrant.

they cant they must have proof before doing so.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , I really want to be pro active and ensure that Opus cannot possibly destroy our family business grown over 20 years and not leave it to chance that a court might simply rubber stamp it because Opus failed to reveal that the company is fictitious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

by citing the DPA they know that they have the wrong person so it begs the question why do they continue to say anything.

 

Record the calls, worth investing in a small hand held recorder and just put them on loudspeaker to pick it up.

 

They will then be stuffed

Link to post
Share on other sites

A court will never just rubberstamp a warrant

without making the necessary checks

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi that's heartening to hear ...but how do I confront Opus at this point ?

 

Well i did say earlier what i would do, contact Scottish Power. Advise them that OPUS are threatening their supply meter and you need their help to stop this hijacking of the supply. Scottish Power can contact OPUS and put a stop to this nonsense.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , Scottish Power have just responded with confirmation that they do indeed supply our power until next year . I have advised them about Opus and requested assistance. Thanks

 

Hi , Opus have not hijacked our supply ...they have created a fictional company that exists in our unit with a fictional supply meter...therefore we cannot challenge it due to DPA

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you can because they are breaking the act by discussing it with you .

pers id just ignore them.

 

 

read those threads in post 23

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a very good point !

 

What they actually did from day one was create a fictional company knowing that nobody could ask questions about it ....but always probing me on the phone for information such as...our company name...etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to get people like Scottish Power interested then telling them that OPUS are trying to hijack their supply to gain from them would work. Energy companies deal with such queries on a daily basis.

 

If you tell them OPUS made up a company name and a ficticious supply, then that is not interesting to SP, as it is not another company trying to steal their supply.

 

You have to think smart in these sutuations to get the help you need. Energy companies use an industry database, where they can search for your business address to see what energy contracts are registered.

 

 

They also have access to internal communications with industry operations within other companies.

They can talk to OPUS with the information you supply and resolve your issue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as its a fictional company then any threats are also fictional...ignore them or let SP sort it out.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as its a fictional company then any threats are also fictional...ignore them or let SP sort it out.

 

We run a food plant . It is not acceptable to us to leave it to chance that unknown people have the capability to break into our plant.

 

To date ...Twitter account we have @opus_energy offering to assist us.

Also ombudsman for electricity have opened a file for us and we have briefed them on the situation .

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is totally outrageous behaviour by Opus Energy .

 

 

We do need an explanation as to why this has happened.

 

#mike_fabricant (MP Lichfield) , @bankofengland need to get involved.

What a huge waste of productivity

 

Opus sent a cold call letter with the intent of highjacking our supply with options on how we could switch .

 

 

When that failed they invented this fake company with a fake meter and fake debt .

 

Our electric provider Scottish Power have the details and are investigating.

 

Opus phoned after creating this fake company .

..refused to state who they were trying to contact (company)

citing the DPA but

 

 

then proceeded to tell us about the account ...a clear breach of the DPA .

 

 

The ICO have been informed.

 

Hi I just spoke to a real person a Opus and it appears to all have been a horrible mistake that should never have happened.

 

Thank you all for your assistance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

admin error

that's what they always say.

some little twerp trying to pull a fast one and make money on commission I bet

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good makes a change for them.

if that's the truth...

 

 

i'll mark your thread resolved

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair ...this site is most excellent.

 

Opus are similar to other power providers in that they have a huge database of customers.

 

The simplest of things can cause huge problems.

 

The site is very useful but you need to separate malice from just plain muddles.

 

If you help both sides get through muddles it makes your site invaluable to both consumers and power providers.

 

The service you provide then becomes superb.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glad you resolved it. Hope OPUS are compensating you for the hassle.

 

Must admit that i struggle to believe it was a muddle. For an energy company to have opened up an energy contract, they needed to receive an instruction containing all of the information. How did they manage to start a contract with a business name similar to your company, operating from the same address ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be fair ...this site is most excellent.

 

Opus are similar to other power providers in that they have a huge database of customers.

 

The simplest of things can cause huge problems.

 

The site is very useful but you need to separate malice from just plain muddles.

 

If you help both sides get through muddles it makes your site invaluable to both consumers and power providers.

 

The service you provide then becomes superb.

 

Thanks

 

In all fairness Spyder I think the only muddle was created by yourself with all the cloak and dagger posting in your initial post...as for malice I cant see any malice contained in your thread at all...but well done on getting it resolved.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...