Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

First time buying advice?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi - apologies if this is on the wrong forum...

 

My mum owns her house outright. She's 71 and wants to help me and my daughter to buy a property/see that we inherit the house when she passes away.

 

Buying a house for us:

Personally - I'm currently self-employed and don't earn very much, I'm reliant on Housing Benefit for my rent.

She has a 18K deposit we could use, but obviously I can't get a mortgage with my current earnings.

So the only option we can think of is Equity Release.

Could somebody shed some light on this option as it appears to be a bad move from the research that I've done.

 

Inheriting the house:

We've thought about switching the house over into my name, so when/if she ever has to go into a home, the equity from the house wouldn't go on home fees?

But in doing this, I'm assuming that I'd have to pay the bills on the house which I can't afford to do right now.

 

Any help/tips/ideas would be greatly appreciated - thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your Mum should not touch Equity release, as that will probably be an expensive way of helping family.

 

I don't think anyone can advise you on an online forum, as we don't know your Mums financial and health situation. Also we don't know the current market value of her house.

 

This type of thing can be a bit if a minefield, as you can't be seen to deliberately give away assets, so you don't have to pay care home home fees if required. This is where your Mum should obtain proper legal advice about the best way to protect herself and any assets she owns, while helping family.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks unclebulgaria67(!)

 

Why is Equity Release not a good idea? Her house is worth 200K, she's a retired teacher and fit as a fiddle.....

 

Just what i have read, that they give the home owner a cash sum in lieu of a charge on the house, but the terms offered are not great. It is not something to enter into without getting advice.

 

I am sure you have read articles on this subject and most say to tread very catefully.

 

Your Mum might live to over 100 as an increasing number do. She also be lucky never to need a care home and can live in her house with occasional help.

 

Perhaps the way forward is for family to buy a bigger house together. Mortgages are now available to pensioners and other members of the family can take out a joint mortgage with her. Has this option been looked into ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Useful link containing info on equity release

 

https://www.moneyadviceservice.org.uk/en/articles/equity-release

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - apologies if this is on the wrong forum...

 

My mum owns her house outright. She's 71 and wants to help me and my daughter to buy a property/see that we inherit the house when she passes away.

 

Buying a house for us:

Personally - I'm currently self-employed and don't earn very much, I'm reliant on Housing Benefit for my rent.

She has a 18K deposit we could use, but obviously I can't get a mortgage with my current earnings.

So the only option we can think of is Equity Release.

Could somebody shed some light on this option as it appears to be a bad move from the research that I've done.

 

Inheriting the house:

We've thought about switching the house over into my name, so when/if she ever has to go into a home, the equity from the house wouldn't go on home fees?

But in doing this, I'm assuming that I'd have to pay the bills on the house which I can't afford to do right now.

 

Any help/tips/ideas would be greatly appreciated - thank you.

 

Hello there.

 

To add to what UB has said, I think you need to check on the rules for Deprivation of Capital if someone needs to go into a care home. Someone can't just give away capital or a house and have no comeback unfotunately.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

To add to what UB has said, I think you need to check on the rules for Deprivation of Capital if someone needs to go into a care home. Someone can't just give away capital or a house and have no comeback unfotunately.

 

Absolutely true. Further more, whilst the mother still resides in the house, it would be classed as a "gift with reservation". The council would also look at the transaction and take steps to recover the asset regardless of the time elapsed between the date of gifting and the point of care being needed.

 

The other danger of transferring ownership is if one of the registered owners is declared bankrupt, the official receiver may well seize the property and evict the mother in order to sell it.

 

Another scheme to avoid is any Wealth Preservation Trust that claims to be able to protect assets from care home fees or inheritance tax. HMRC and local authorities have wised up to these schemes and will still regard the assets as being owned ny the person in question. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-39589083

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

switiching the house to you and your siblings wont stop it being used to pay for care fees unless you either move in or you mum then pays you a commercial rent and when she moves into a care home you take action to evict her from your property so she cant return. Even then they may decide that she has deliberately deprived herself of her assets so flogging the house as soon as you get it wouild be the way round that but the new owner wont want you mum living with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.moneyadviceservice.org.uk/en/articles/equity-release

 

Interesting article from the Money Advice service.

 

I think not being able to rely on the property for health care should Mum need to go into care at anytime would be the most important thing that would see me off looking at this way of releasing equity.

If you release equity from your home, you might not be able to rely on your property for money you need later in your retirement. For instance, if you need to pay for long-term care.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

also be aware - government legislation on selling or transfer house to children whilst elder parent alive has implications i.e. :- further life and care home charges think you are on a looser here due to circumstances???? sure others will advise also?

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hello - is there a forum specifically for ways of buying a house?

I'd like some advice on some different options I've come up with buying my first property -  buying with my mum/a friend for example or advice on equity release etc

 

Thanks ever so much!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you might want to read again from post 1 here

you sort of asked this question 2 years ago.

threads now merged.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

the only way it would work is if your mother sold you the house at close to the market value and then paid you a market rent to live there.

As you cant afford to buy it that will be a non-starter and the rental income would kill your benefits entitlement. If you became jopint tenants then you would have to pay stamp duty on the value of the property and the council may still try their luck with a charge against the property for care costs so you would need some guarantee that she doesnt need any care for a good number of years

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...