Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because therte was still £69 owing, so I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle.   However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account 106985089 has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, so I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
    • they have 6mts else it dies. ................. BUT yet again today you've posted on someone else's thread posts now moved here. please keep to your OWN THREAD!! now to date you've not bothered to reply to our questions so we CAN help you.    
    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problems with a mail order pc build


postmn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2421 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I brought a PC from a well known high end pc retailer dec 15 and started using it ,

within a month it had to be returned because they had done the Overclock too severely so I said make it stock speeds .

this time they had to replace the cpu and motherboard ,

 

Fast forward to last year and the m2 SDD failed and to save time they asked me to remove it and return it to them for testing and it was found to failed so it was replaced .

 

And finally to last week I found that the case was very hot when under load above the cpu airflow

looked inside and found all case fans were not turning .

 

 

After having a argument about who was paying for the postage

I had it packed up and sent back to them for repair .

 

 

Yesterday they said yes they have fixed it so are just doing the burn it ( leave it over night for temp reading etc) .

I queries that that was the problem. or no other damage was done due to failure of the fans and they said no just a connecting had come lose due to being close to the fans vibration .

 

 

I said what about the thermal throttling (This is where the cpu/ Graphics card slows down their clock speed to prevent damage ,

they said they did not come across ir .

subsequently I get a email from them from their quality control saying it had failed Yup you guess it high cpu temp when under load ,

 

In the space of 18 months I have had to return this system twice and return a sub part

can I do anything about it or do I just have to accept I got the Friday afternoon build.

 

I must point out I usually build my own systems but this time I thought I would ge ta decent company to build it for me this time.

 

I have 18 months left on the warranty on the system and I am concerned about the amount of times its being returned

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

ok a small update

I received it back from them apparently repaired

 

in insufficient packing (Pictures Taken ) as.

when I accepted it I felt it moving and got it all set up and it failed on install .

I immediately phoned them and said its failed and the packaging was insufficient

they arranged to have it picked up ,

 

I have now a hour ago received a email from them saying the fault is the graphics card and it needs to be replaced ,

problem st evga don't make them now but 18 months ago it was very powerful ,

 

they have said they will refund me the value of the card and then I would have to top it up if the card is more ,

 

surely it should be the courier company and scan that should be sorting it out since I should not be left out of pocket

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing to do with the courier

 

 

if a part fails and its now obsolete

then typically yes retails do offer to refund the parts cost and you make up the diff.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

what I'm saying is apparently it left them working and then when it got to me the system failed due to insufficient packing from them and or courier handling . don't see why I should be out of pocket for something that should of been avoidable

Link to post
Share on other sites

how can you prove it was due to shipping?

you say it wouldn't power up no display?

had it jumped out?

 

 

like you I do all my own

 

 

and build for others too

 

 

have done since commodore PET days.

 

 

what happened upon power up then?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

probably due to fail anyway if it had been cooked.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they did try to overclock it despite it being received unlocked and if they had read the history they would of seen it not to be oc.

 

As to why I can prove it was due ti shipping . They said it worked when it left them gets sent by a courier in insufficient packaging plug it all in when recioeved and failed .also fans stared really over raved .

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't get me wrong

I sympathise totally with you but just maybe, bad packing is a red herring.

but understandable as its the only logical reason.

 

 

I would suggest they have returned the graphic card under their warranty with the manu

and the manu has refunded them

which I quite often do.

 

 

the issue now is someone has to pay for the 'upgrade' to put you back into the position you should be

they might well be trying it on to mitigate their losses.

 

 

might be an idea to fine fine tooth their warranty and see what it says about obsolete parts that fail within warranty.

 

 

lets see if they address this.

if they don't

then I don't see why you have to pay.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then tell them that...

please replace the faulty card with one of equivalent spec

I do not need the all singing all dancing upgraded version of that card.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...