Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell/cohens - Notice of pending legal action old Shop Direct debt


stamarie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2431 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure I'm in the right forum but could someone offer me some help.

 

I've received a letter from Cohen Cramer solicitors that is a notice of pending legal action.

Their client is Lowell Portfolio I Ltd but the original debt was with Shop Direct.

 

It's been 3 years since I defaulted

 

I've had previous letters that I've ignored but never anything about legal action. The debt is for £213.

 

Please could someone advise me what I should do next

 

I'm worried about the legal action.

 

I've never had any contact with anyone about the debt or requested any documents from them.

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

When did you originally take out the Shop Direct account ?

 

You could send Lowell a CCA request, as they really have to comply with that before any court claim could proceed.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

go check your credit file?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure exactly when I opened the account I think it would have been 2007/2008.

 

As dx suggests check your credit report for opening date of SD account.

 

It is relevant to you, because of the changes in legislation. For CCA's taken out pre April 2007, the claimant creditor would need to supply the original CCA that was issued, if you defended any court claim. For an account taken out from April 2007, they would still need to comply with the CCA request to be able to succeed with a defended court claim, but due to change in legislation they don't need to supply the original CCA document.

 

As it is quite likely a court claim would be issued at some point, sending a CCA request to Lowell might prove worthwhile.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be interest and charges added since.

 

Yes you should send the CCA request.

 

Up to you, but if you can afford to repay the debt, you could tell Cohen Cramer that the debt is actually £129 according to Shop Direct and you will settle that amount. If you do this, send a without prejudice headed letter making the offer to settle for the correct amount of £129.

 

Do you know whether the £129 includes penalty charges for late payment ? If it does, then perhaps the amount you really owe is less than £129 and if you get hold of details from SD, you can offer a lower amount related to what the true debt should be.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the defaulted date?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not in the position to be able to repay the amount at the moment.

That's why I'm getting worried.

 

 

Is it likely they will start legal proceedings or is it another way of trying to get people to pay?

Link to post
Share on other sites

threat-o-gram...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You defaulted 3 years ago and the default is £129. That amount will probably include late payment fees over a number of months, so the actual true debt may be less than £100.

 

If you are worried about dealing with a court claim and possibly getting a CCJ, why don't you get hold of statements of account from SD. Then send a without prejudice letter offering to settle the true debt amount of £x over the period you need to afford to repay it.

 

As dx says, it might just be a threat-0-gram and they don't issue a court claim. But given that Lowell do authorise for a lot of court claims to be issued, they might issue one amd then you have more hassle dealing with it. Your choice really.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You defaulted 3 years ago and the default is £129. That amount will probably include late payment fees over a number of months, so the actual true debt may be less than £100.

 

 

If you are worried about dealing with a court claim and possibly getting a CCJ, why don't you get hold of statements of account from SD. Then send a without prejudice letter offering to settle the true debt amount of £x over the period you need to afford to repay it.

 

As dx says, it might just be a threat-0-gram and they don't issue a court claim. But given that Lowell do authorise for a lot of court claims to be issued, they might issue one amd then you have more hassle dealing with it. Your choice really.

 

OK thank you, would I need to contact shop direct for the statements? Sorry for all the questions this is all new to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK thank you, would I need to contact shop direct for the statements? Sorry for all the questions this is all new to me.

 

Yes

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could also send an sar.SD will probable buff you away if you ring

saying contact lowells

an sar is a legal doc they cant refuse.

 

 

is your online account still working

one here with a claimform found it was even after 3yrs since SD sold the debt on.

he got all the statements free that way.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've managed to get into the account but there's no infomation or statements on there.

 

You could phone SD and see if they will provide copies of a few statements, going back far enough so you can see what the true debt amount is.

 

If they refuse, you could send Cohens a without prejudice letter just saying that you are looking into the matter further and have sent a CCA request to Lowell for more information. Then send Lowell the CCA request and when you make the request ask them to also supply copies of statements from SD.

 

That should stop any court claim being issued for now and it might take awhile for Lowells to complete the CCA request.

 

Remember when sending letters to companies, to keep copies and to get proof of posting receipt from post office. If you have not done this before, at the post offive counter, if you ask for proof of posting, they will just write or print a slip recording that you posted a letter to x company.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a CCJ from Lowells and have learnt the hard way how to beat them and since then have managed to wipe 2 debts (Shop Direct and Next).

A few points

 

1. Do not ignore the pre legal action threat, they are serious!

This is Lowell's MO.

Wait until the debt is about to disappear from your credit file, then ruin you for another 6 years with a CCJ. Such a nice bunch !!

 

2. They are utterly and completely useless at coming up with any of the CCA requirements. It's probable they will either not have the CCA details, or send you a botched agreement meaning the debt is unenforceable in a court , rendering a CCJ impossible.

 

3 Wiped Debt 1 :- Lowell sent me a pre legal judgement, I CCA'd them , 3 reminders and many phonecalls later they still were making excuses. I filed a complaint that they were breaching the CCA and Data protection and they needed to wipe my debt or i would report them to FOS and Information Comisisoner. Letter received , account closed, all traces wiped from my credit file.

 

4 Wiped Debt 2:- Same, but this time after 5 months they came up with a signed agreement in response to my CCA. Sadly for them that was the only legible part, there was no date and no date on the Terms and conditions. I wrote back saying the agreement was unenforceable and they had tried to mislead me into believing this was the original not a recon agreement and I would report them to FOS. Account closed, debt wiped double quick!

 

Conclusion. The simple act of sending a CCA will stop any chance of a CCJ with Lowell, and depending on how they respond may wipe your debt from credit history. Burying your head in the sand and ignoring them will result in a CCJ and your credit being damaged for 6 more years!

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...