Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The incident was 03rd March 2024 - and that was the only letter that I have received from MET 15th April 2024 The charge I paid was at the Stansted Airport exit gate (No real relevance now - I thought this charge was for that!!).   Here is the content of email to them (Yes I know I said I was the driver !!!!) as said above -  I thought this charge was for that!! "Stansted Airport" Dear “To whom it may concern” My name is ??  PCN:  ?? Veh Reg: Date of Incident: 03rd March 2024 I have just received a parking charge final reminder letter, dated 10th April 2024 - for an overstay.  This is the first to my knowledge of any overstay. I am aware that I am out of the 28 days, I don’t mean to be rude, this feels like it is a scam My movements on this day in question are, I pulled into what looked like a service station on my way to pick my daughter and family up from Stansted airport. The reason for me pulling into this area was to use a toilet, so I found Starbucks, and when into there, after the above, I then purchased a coffee. After which I then continued with my journey to pick my daughter up. (however after I sent this email I remember that Starbucks was closed so I then I walked over to Macdonalds) There was no signs about parking or any tickets machines to explains about the parking rules. Once at Stansted, I entered and then paid on exit.  So Im not show where I overstayed my welcome.. With gratitude    
    • Just to enlarge on Dave's great rundown of your case under Penalty. In the oft quoted case often seen on PCNs,  viz PE v Beavis while to Judges said there was a case for claiming that £100 was a penalty, this was overruled in this case because PE had a legitimate interest in keeping the car park free for other motorists which outweighed the penalty. Here there is no legitimate interest since the premises were closed. Therefore the charge is a penalty and the case should be thrown out for that reason alone.   The Appeals dept need informing about what and what isn't a valid PCN. Dummies. You should also mention that you were unable to pay by Iphone as there was no internet connection and there was a long  queue to pay on a very busy day . There was no facility for us to pay from the time of our arrival only the time from when we paid at the machine so we felt that was a bit of a scam since we were not parked until we paid. On top of that we had two children to load and unload in the car which should be taken into account since Consideration periods and Grace periods are minimum time. If you weren't the driver and PoFA isn't compliant you are off scot free since only the driver is liable and they are saying it was you. 
    • Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x Thank you dx. I consider myself well and truly told :) x
    • Doubt the uneconomic write off would be registered, unless you agreed to accept write off settlement of the claim. It is just cosmetic damage. All that has happened, is that the car has been looked at and they realised the repair costs are going to exceed the value of the car. If the car is perfectly driveable with no upcoming normal work required to pass next MOT, your current Insurers will continue Insurance and you can accept an amount from third party Insurers to go towards you repairing the scratched bodywork.    
    • Peter McCormack says the huge investment by the twins will help Real Bedford build a new ground.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2429 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband and I recently moved out of a small 2 bed-semi that we rented for 5 years.

 

The landlady did the check out with my husband - taking almost 3 hours.

She pointed out a number of things she was no happy with in terms of cleaning

(if there was a slight mark/spot that had missed it meant we hadn't cleaned it at all and it was filthy etc) and reluctantly my husband agreed to £100 'cleaning' bill - signed the check out sheet, as did my landlady.

 

She sent it through to the DPS but due to no internet and started new professional jobs we didn't see it before she cancelled it and decided that she wanted to keep all of the deposit.

 

Her reasons for keeping all the deposit kept changing as every time we told her that it was unreasonable/not true etc she'd come up with a new reason.

 

She's the sort of landlord who would get fixated on one/two thing(s) regardless of the truth and convince herself it was the case

e.g. she claimed that we put the (mainly empty) boxes on the unboarded areas in the loft

- we told her that we hadn't and asked her to look,

 

 

she replied with well they were the last time I looked

- they hadn't moved since we put them up there!

 

 

She also mentioned the additional wear on the carpet of the bottom 2 stairs.

I told her that this was how it was when she rented it to us and that she had even written it on the inventory

- showed her and she mumbled something in disagreement

- has now decided that 'more wear on lower steps' is referring to a non-existent stain!

This is despite her inventory being OTT compared to others I have seen

(i.e including garden wall, electrical grate coverings etc)

 

guess my main questions are:

1. What would be considered the average lifespan of a mattress (1000 sprung double)? If there are marks from the metal bed frame, can she claim that it is no longer fit for purpose and therefore claim?

 

She says it was £377 and should last 8 years and therefore is claiming 3 years.

 

She told us she always gets a new mattress after she has had long term tenants hence why we had a new one as the previous tenants had been there for 4 years.

 

2. The sofa has about 5 threads pulled on the back corner which have been fabric glued back down but leaves v. small gaps over an area about 6cm x 4cm.

It also has a patch on the arm from where the vanish cleaning product made it slightly darker

(she requested it was cleaned and we stopped after we saw that it wasn't doing anything and making it darker).

She is claiming these things makes it now longer fit for purpose and therefore is claiming for it.

 

She doesn't have an invoice and on starting the tenancy she told us that it was an old sofa but still very comfortable which is why she has kept it.

She says she bought it is 2008 but I'm sure she mentioned that it was about 8 years old when we moved in in 2012!

 

 

The inventory states it was in fair condition (as opposed to her good, v.good, excellent or new that other items are).

She said that it was £800+ but using the figure £600 and states that on average it should have 12 years lifespan and so is claiming for 3 years (£150)

 

Thank you for any help anyone can give.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she says she changes the mattress after very 'long term' tenant, the last one was there for 4 years and you have been there for 5 years then she would have been going to change the mattress anyway so how can she charge you for it?

 

I think she is trying it on with the stair carpet and nit picking with the sofa! I would dispute these amounts with the deposit holding company!

Link to post
Share on other sites

and photos to prove the state it was when you moved in...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately we only have photos taken about 2 weeks after we moved but they are just of the general rooms that my husband took to show his mum. At the same time - the landlady does not have any photos either...

 

We had little choice in where we were moving to 5yrs ago as we had got a place sorted

(agency fees etc paid but we were to sign contracts on the day we were moving in)

but the landlady (different one) let it out to a family friend and we found out late on the 14th when we were due to move in on the 16th.

 

 

We found the place we've just moved out of by chance, viewed on 15th and moved in on the 16th.

Therefore we didn't think about taking pictures/looking specifically at the cleanliness, specific marks etc just wanted somewhere to move into to as otherwise we would have been homeless with a fair bit of furniture but no storage!

 

With regards to her changing the mattress between tenants, we have no written proof that she does this :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen some inventories that specifically mention the position of a weed in the garden

so being OTT is a moot point but wear and tear is just that so "more" wear and tear is still wear and tear.

 

As for the sofa, look for the manufacturer's label and give them a call and see if they can tell you how old it is by the design and fabric combo.

If you cant get to see it again hopefully you have some pictures of it in the background or whatever.

A bit of research will then give you an approximate age.

 

Mattress- well if she changes it after 4 years she owes you 1/4 of a mattress.

I would be concerned about bodily fluid stains ( or split teas that looks the same) making it unusable for a future letting rather than rub marks from the bedstead

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...