Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Intention to prosecure letter by essex police for speeding


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2279 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I hope I can get some help on a situation, unfortunately I was caught speeding on the motorway the letter I received from Essex police is to identify the driver "application for the identity of the driver"

 

i was clocked at 108mph on a 70mph - no previous, no points clean drivers license - what should i do?, fill the document in and sent over? i mean it was me driving, also it was at 5.14 am in the morning.

 

what could i be looking at as its the first time/offence?

 

cheers Red11

Link to post
Share on other sites

sadly its well over 100MPH.

it'll be a ban.

 

 

if you look in recent speeding threads here

you'll see the legislation already

 

 

yes fill that doc out

delaying/not doing it hurts you more than admitting the offence

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dx100uk,

 

so how does it work, i fill in the form, they will give me a date to go to court and?

fine and banned?

how long will be the ban?

even if its first offence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

read the link explains all

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you, i'm not clear on a couple of points, does the fact that it was first offence count for anything? again if they do apply the ban, how long will it be for?

 

also does admission of guilt help the cause at all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Admission of guilt will help, but magistrates hands will be tied, unless you have an exceptional reason that you were speeding. You dont. Admit it and hope you get a very leniant judge. Some judges give 30-60 day bans, if y ou are guilty and very remorseful. Others go by the book and could give more PLUS fines. Also hope they dont order you to take a retest.

 

Dx's link is what you need to read and what you should expect the punishment to be.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

1st offence might help

but ofcourse its simply 1st time they've caught you.

 

 

over 100MPH is considered serious enough for a very probable ban.

as the chart says if you read it

.......

 

 

Disqualify 7-56 days OR 6 points

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

always better to attend court too and take your driving licence with you

you will have to surrender it

 

you will not be allowed to drive home

unless the judge specifically tells you the ban doesn't start until time/date

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Return the request for driver's details, naming yourself.

 

You will receive either a court date or a "Single Justice Procedure Notice" (SJPN).

They have six months to do this and will probably take most of that time.

 

If you receive a SJPN (the most likely) it will give you three options:

Plead Guilty and have the matter dealt with by the Single Justice Procedure;

Plead Not Guilty (in which case your matter will be transferred to the normal Magistrates' Court), or

Plead Guilty and opt for a full court hearing.

 

Your best option is the first.

You cannot attend a SJ hearing (it is held in an office with a single magistrate assisted by a Legal Advisor and all matters are heard "on paper").

You have no realistic mitigation so will simply be sentenced in accordance with the guidelines.

 

As above the guideline fine is 1.5 times your weekly income (reduced by a third if you plead guilty) and either a ban of up to 56 days or 6 points.

Most courts seem to be imposing six points for such a speed these days but it is a matter for the court.

 

If the SJ is considering disqualification the matter will be transferred to the normal court and you will be asked to attend.

You cannot be disqualified in your absence without first being given the opportunity to attend court.

As well as the fine you will pay £85 costs and a surcharge of 10% of the fine (Min £30, Max £170).

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Man in the Middle,

just a clarification i'm self employed under my limited company,

 

my income has been up and down,

I guess what i'm saying is how do they define the weekly income?

 

at the moment I've been working 2 days a week.

i'm trying to sign up new clients but its been a challenge.

 

Also depending on the fine,

how much time are we given to pay the fine,

 

if its something silly like £1,000 which I don't have at this moment, would they take instalments?

 

on the insurance front,

i have spoken to a few brokers and with my long standing no claims bonuses 10+ years, with 6 points I might be looking at an extra £60/70 on top of my current premium which is £300 fully comp, the 6 points is not an earthquake per say.

 

I'm more concerned with the size of the fine.

and if i'll be given time to pay it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess what i'm saying is how do they define the weekly income?

 

 

They don't. You do.

You will have to estimate your weekly earnings when you complete a form detailing your means.

Although fines are officially payable in full immediately the court will accept any reasonable offer you make to them to pay the sum off weekly or monthly.

 

 

Don't take the Mickey by offering 10p per week.

Just make a sensible offer that you can afford that will see the sum cleared in a few months.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its something silly like £1,000 which I don't have at this moment, would they take instalments?

 

Is it the fine that is silly?

Or getting caught doing 108 mph?

 

Don't take the Mickey by offering 10p per week. Just make a sensible offer that you can afford that will see the sum cleared in a few months.

 

I agree.

 

Also don't be tempted to hint that any fine is "silly"

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you BazzaS - I was not aware you also dispense sarcasm - to your remark I would say, in 20 years of clean driving, everyone falls fouls. like it or not.

 

further, I think ii have enough guile and know how to distinguish the setting as to where to use an expression like "silly" what often is used in colloquial form is not necessarily what is going to be put forward in a more official setting.

 

nor I mentioned that I would be referring to the fine as silly in an official context.

 

Is it the fine that is silly?

Or getting caught doing 108 mph?

 

 

 

I agree.

 

Also don't be tempted to hint that any fine is "silly"

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you BazzaS - I was not aware you also dispense sarcasm - to your remark I would say, in 20 years of clean driving, everyone falls fouls. like it or not.

 

Yes, they can do (fall foul).

Yet, at the same time, they can also (when they fall foul), 'man up' and accept the consequences, be that a ban, and / or a 'silly' fine.

 

If they want to whinge about a fine : then they should be more careful to avoid speeding. Otherwise, take the risk, and then don't whinge when you get caught.

 

20 years of clean driving?.

Is that 20 years of not getting caught? or 20 years of clean driving and "it was an abberation, and I'll take my punishment knowing that I dropped from my previous standards".

You can't have it both ways ......

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with your view, the forum exists dispense some good advise, with life circumstances in your case your view are pointless you are not a subject matter expert, nor you have any views that offer any value, for that reason rather that quoting people that have given a concise constructive view, why don't you start your own thread and give yourself a bit of advise.

 

please don't post on mine, you add no value with the exception of wanting to post inflammatory views.

 

Merci!

 

 

Yes, they can do (fall foul).

Yet, at the same time, they can also (when they fall foul), 'man up' and accept the consequences, be that a ban, and / or a 'silly' fine.

 

If they want to whinge about a fine : then they should be more careful to avoid speeding. Otherwise, take the risk, and then don't whinge when you get caught.

 

20 years of clean driving?.

Is that 20 years of not getting caught? or 20 years of clean driving and "it was an abberation, and I'll take my punishment knowing that I dropped from my previous standards".

You can't have it both ways ......

Link to post
Share on other sites

my sincere apologies to you Man in The Middle, let me say that i'm very grateful for you time and information given - I have sent a note to the moderator to address the matter.

 

once again thank you for taking the time to assist

 

Red

 

 

I don't know whether this site has a moderator but if so this "spat" helps nobody. All it's done is made me come back to view the latest posts and see if I can help further only to find I've wasted my time.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree with your view, the forum exists dispense some good advise, with life circumstances in your case your view are pointless you are not a subject matter expert, nor you have any views that offer any value

 

Ahh, well, I'm expert enough to know to find the Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines .........

 

Even an 'expert' can't reliably predict if the bench / DJ on the day will decide if it is "just" Band C (101 mph and over), or if 108 (as 54.3% on top of the limit) is "grossly in excess of the speed limit".

 

The difference? 6 points OR 7-56 days disqual, against "more than 56 days disqualification". So, with one you MAY escape a ban (or get a ban that doesn't involve re-applying for your licence), and with the other you get a ban (AND have to re-apply for your licence once the ban has ended, too).

Link to post
Share on other sites

BazzaS well done you can use Google! - please refrain from Posting on my thread - as I asked before. your value add is "0" there are really good Cagers that spent a lot of time in helping and giving helpful views.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even an 'expert' can't reliably predict if the bench / DJ on the day will decide if it is "just" Band C (101 mph and over), or if 108 (as 54.3% on top of the limit) is "grossly in excess of the speed limit".

 

Quite true. But since the guideline penalty of 6 points or a ban of up to 56 days covers speeds up to 110mph it is a fairly good bet that the maximum of 56 days will not be exceeded for 108mph. Incidentally, a ban of 56 days requires a licence re-application. Only bans of 55 days or less see the driver's licence temporarily invalid (whilst he does retain it) for the duration of the ban.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...