Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Documents arrived today dated 27th March.  This is a cc taken out a long time ago (2008) and they don't seem to have been able to provide a copy of a CCA agreement, just reams of print outs of lines of texts from old bank statements, default notices etc.   
    • Documents finally arrived today from PRA group.  New day have sent me lots of paperwork, copies of default letters and statements, print out of what looks like a CCA that would have been completed on online, IP address as signature.  This debt is not too old, so possible this is the true copy of agreement ?  Not sure what my defence would be beyond irresponsible lending. 
    • pers i wouldn't.. all you need to know is in the posts of that thread....that being section 127(3) of the CCA refers. if under a CCA return, the 'creditor' claims its a recon, it must not contain any details like a sig, tickbox, or typed name (whether you signed physically or by online tickbox) 1. those are not necessary in a recon, so why inc them? (faked??) 2, it cant thus be a recon!!, it must be a copy of the 'original' from the original creditor, not from a debt buyers filing cabinet. they shouldn't not be 'mixing' some original docs from the OC with crap from their filing cabinet, claiming its ALL a recon! because some of it is faked. just remember there are far more docs like NOA and a DN that are as equally important to a court claim of 'this debt is enforceable'. never rely solely upon the dodgy agreement argument.
    • India has thousands of small gold refineries which are facing more competition from big players.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MMF adding £328 to the alleged Mr Lender debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2291 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

on the 14th day when I sent my reqyest they supplied me with PDF of Credit Agreement from CFO Loan.

Final page reads:

 

Signature by you:

Please complete the form below to digitally sign and accept your loan agreement. By entering your surname and the code that was

sent to You by email and SMS You are entering into a legally binding agreement.

This is a Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer credit Act 1974. Sign it only if you want to be bound by its terms.

Signature of the Debtor

Surname:......................................

Code:...........................................

Acceptance by us:

Signed for and on behalf of CFO Lending

.........................................duly authorised

Date.................................which is the date of this Agreement

 

 

 

No signature on it....

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably done online so wont be

unless YOU know you did sign one?

 

scan it up to ONE PDF please

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

is this not being written off by IRL claim?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no, it ended up in MMF and FOB complaint dept and they reply was:

 

From MMF:

 

We understand your concern to be that you feel CFO Lending did not carry out sufficient checks and were irresponsible in approving your loans.

 

Prior to any loan being issued, CFO Lending required potential customers to provide the following data at point of application; employment status & job title, income, household & financial expenditure and tenure. This information was inputted via an online form. Based on this information, we are comfortable that affordability was sought by CFO Lending.

 

Upon purchase of these accounts, MMF took the decision to remove all interest and charges and reduce the balance to principal amount only. This means that we are only asking you to repay the original amount which you borrowed.

 

Conclusion

 

Having reviewed your complaint and based on the information detailed above we can advise that your complaint has been rejected.

 

We would like to think the action taken and the decision made will be to your satisfaction. However, this is our Final Response; if you remain unhappy with our reply we are enclosing a leaflet about the Financial Ombudsman Service. You have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge – but you must do so within six months from the date of this letter.

 

 

If you do not refer your complaint in time, the Ombudsman will not have our permission to consider your complaint and so will only be able to do so in very limited circumstances. For example, if the Ombudsman believes that the delay was as a result of exceptional circumstances.

 

 

If you would like a copy of this response by post including the leaflet please let me know by return email.

 

 

Customer Relations Officer

Motormile Finance UK Ltd (MMF)

 

 

 

Here was reply from FOB

 

The FCA did indeed instruct Cfo Lending to refund some of their customers for unfair practices and the redress offered included some of their customers’ outstanding balances being written off.

 

Cfo Lending needed to contact all the affected customers by March 2017, unfortunately if you haven’t been contacted by them by now it would suggest that you aren’t one of the customers affected by these unfair practices. However, I can see on the link you provided that it states that if you believe you were affected by any of the issues in the link and may be entitled to redress, you should contact them on 0203 583 6303.

 

We can contact the administrator on your behalf and ask them to look into your complaint. But unfortunately we won’t be able to help further.

 

I hope this information helps, but if you have any further questions please let us know.

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

*Financial Ombudsman Service, Exchange Tower, London, E14 9SR

Link to post
Share on other sites

then you need to write to CFO and start an IL complaint with them.

MMF are simply a debt buyer/DCA

the IL complaint should not have gone to them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm..I wonder how other have gotten on with CFO loans...

 

that's pretty irish to me..

sell it to a DCA and let them decide how much you should pay...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...