Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell claim form - Vanquis CC statute barred!!


steve806
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2182 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

submitted SAR for Vanquis CC debt on 19th July 2017.

 

Have received a reply dated 2nd August 2017.

 

It says receipt of my letter confirmed and apologies for delay in response.

 

Letter then states

'A request has been sent to the original creditor for a copy of the agreement and statement of account. These will be forwarded upon receipt.'

 

Further advises

'The above details relate to an account opened in September 2007.

Last payment was made to the original creditor on 26th August 2011.

Please see below for a list of transactions.'

 

There then follows a list of shops names with transaction 1, transaction 2 etc typed next to them. No monetary amounts just shop names.

 

Letter ends with statement

'We have suspended action on the account to allow for the original creditor to provide us with the requested information.

If you wish to speak to a member of our staff please call etc etc.'

 

Can anyone advise:

 

1. Will Vanquis provide the information?

2. What if anything should I do now?

 

Any help greatly apprfeciated.

 

cheers

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you send a CCA request to Lowell's

Or an sar to vanquis

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if they don't comply with the signed agreement soon it will be statute barred

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Well incredibly I have received a parcel from Lowell this morning. It contains:

 

1. A letter from Vanquis quoting the Electronics Communication Act 2000 stating that I have entered into an agreement online and that my signature is therefore not required.

 

2. Pages of Digital Signature Application Details

 

3. Pages of transactions on the account.

 

4. A letter from Lowells stating I have 14 days to contact them and agree a payment or arrangement or 'we may apply to enter a CCJ'.

 

The last payment made to Vanquis was on 26/8/2011. Is the debt statute barred?

 

What if anything should I do at this time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes

 

ignore them unless you get a claimform.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Received a Letter of Claim today.

 

Opening paragraph states:

 

As you are aware we act for Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd and we write to inform you of its intention to issue proceedings against you in the county court for failing to pay an outstanding sum owed to it.

 

The second paragraph begins - This letter is being sent to you in accordance with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols etc etc.

 

The paragraph ends with - Ignoring this letter may lead to our client commencing proceedings against you and may increase your liability for costs.

 

Letter proceeds to detail particulars of debt advising when debt was assigned and providing a statement from that date to now.

 

letter finishes by saying - Please note that if we do not receive payment or other response from you within 30 days, we are instructed to issue a claim without further reference to you together with interest and costs estimated below.

 

 

Do I continue to ignore?

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?481827-The-Pre-Action-Protocol-for-Debt-Claims-is-made-by-the-Master-of-the-Rolls-as-Head-of-Civil-Justice.-1st-Oct-2017

see post 6 of the above thread

download the attachment

 

tick box D

because ..the debt is statute barred

 

tick box H

enclosed .. [download our statute barred letter from the debt collection section of the library]

 

nothing else!!

 

print your name DO NOT SIGN THE FORM

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just received a response from Lowell.

 

they state:

 

"S5 states that an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.

 

The account was taken out on September 2007 and went in to default in April 2012 as a result of non payment. it was at this time the initial 6 year limitation commenced as this was the initial cause of action. This would allow till April 2018 so the debt is not statute barred."

 

The last payment made on the account was 26th August 2011 and previous advice on this thread said that meant the statute barred date was August 2017.

 

I am now a bit confused. Can someone advise which is correct and give some advice on next steps please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the opinion is cause is from the breach of contract, which re a credit card wld usually be around a month or two after the last payment.

but, these claimants say the dn or default date when whichever suits them in the circumstances. and unfortunately some district judges have gone with that.

it seems to be a matter in issue for the courts atm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know if its is relevant but Vanquis statement shows they began charging me the following with effect from June 2011:

 

OVER LIMIT CHARGE DEFAULT FEE PLAN INT FREE

LATE PAYMENT CHARGE DEFAULT PLAN INT FREE

BILLED FINANCE CHARGES DEFAULT INTEREST

BILLED FINANCE CHARGES PURCHASE INTEREST

 

these charges were applied for 6 months with the last charges in January 2012. I made a payment in June, july and August but nothing since then.

 

I wondered:

 

1. Does the fact I was getting 'default charges' from 2011 have any bearing?

2. Why do the charges stop in January 2012 but according to Lowell the default wasn't until April 2012?

 

Also, There are ROP fees on the account from October 2007 until March 2011. Can these be reclaimed?

 

Again, any advice on what to do next welcomed

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. yes reclaim them.

2. cause that's when they prepared to sell the debt

 

3.yes

 

cause of action is the 1st missed payment else the rest wouldnt count would they..think about.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you saying I can reclaim all the default charges?

they total more than 25% of the outstanding debt.

How would I go about that?

 

How do I reclaim ROP charges?

 

Sorry if being thick but can I claim charges back from vanquis when they have sold the debt?

 

Is my next action to write back to lowell and dispute the cause of action date based on the view

1st missed payment is the initial cause of action

stating i will defend in court on that basis or do i wait until Lowell issue a court claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As Lowells claim the cause of action date is April 2012 when they say the card defaulted

but kind advice given on this site suggests the cause of action date is August 2017 when the last payment is made we seem to be at an impasse.

 

Lowells have said they will give me until 2nd February to contact them or they may proceed with court action so what should I do know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore lowells stupid time limits

 

its statute barred end of

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Today I received a Claim Form from the County Court Business Centre.

 

Particulars of Claim

 

Defendant entered into a Consumer Credit Act 1974 regulated agreement with Vanquis under account reference **************

 

Defendant failed to maintain the required payments and arrears began to accrue

 

The agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 15/2/2013 and notice given to the defendant

 

Despite repeated requests for payment the sum of ***** remains due and outstanding.

 

Note: they have changed the date of assignment to 2013 from all previous correspondence which stated 2012 and the SAR response which stated same.

 

Any advice on my next steps greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

not really..but doesn't matter

tis SB's our SB defence will kill it dead

get that link sorted

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio 1 Ltd

 

Date of issue – 21st February 2018

 

What is the claim for –

 

1. The claimant entered into a Consumer Credit Act 1974 regulated agreement with Vanquis under account reference *************** (*The Agreement')

 

2. The defendant failed to to maintain the required payments and arrears began to accrue.

 

3. The Agreement was later assigned to the claimant on 15/2/2013 and notice given to the defendant

 

4. Despite repeated requests for payment, the sum of £4000 remains due and outstanding.

 

And the claimant claims

a) the said sum of £4000

b)interest pursuant to s69 County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue, accruing at a daily rate of £0.900, but limited to one year, being £300

c) Costs

Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ?

Yes - at this point I challenged debt as statute barred based on last payment date. Claimant response detailed in thread

What is the value of the claim? £4500

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Mid 2007

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

Aware account has been assigned through chasing letters but cannot recall if received Notice of Assignment

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Don't remember

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Not sure

 

Why did you cease payments? Financial difficulties, Loss of job, marriage breakdown, evicted from rental property

 

What was the date of your last payment? 26/8/2011 Lowell state CoA April 2012

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Discussed financial problems with Vanquis in response to letters chasing lack of payment. Vanquis were not helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't do this until andyorch gives the ok

but going by the above thread to date

lowells are relying upon the late registering of the dn to gauge SB date,

 

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

type your name ONLY

 

no need to sign anything

.

you DO NOT await the return of paperwork.

you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform.

 

......

 

part two

pop up on mcol and register this defence:

 

alternative whereby claimant intimates SB date=defaulted date and that has been registered months after the last payment

 

 

Defence

 

1 The Claimant's claim was issued on 21st February 2018.

 

2.The date last payment made was the 26th August 2011

 

3.The Default Noticed was issued April 2012 and served eight months after the initial breach thus the cause of action delayed by 8 months and the Limitations period prolonged to 6 years and 8 months which in effect allows the creditor to stop time running and the creditor having effective control of when a limitation period begins or even starts to run.

 

4.Therefore the Defendant contends that the Claimant's claim so issued is a claim in contract and is statute barred pursuant to the provisions of section 5 of the limitation act 1980. If, which is denied, the claimant contends that the Defendant is in breach of the alleged contract, in excess of 6 years have elapsed since the date on which any true cause of action for breach accrued for the benefit of the Claimant.

 

5.The Claimant's claim to be entitled to payment of £(Insert total amount on claim form) or any other sum, or relief of any kind is denied.

 

...........

Edited by Andyorch
dates added

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes go ahead and submit the above....I have inserted the dates for you

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...