Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
    • saying the thread is locked, what shall I do?
    • Please fill in the forum sticky and upload a copy of the invoice, redacted of anything that could identify you -  
    • first time to use this forum, so a bit clueless got a PCN from Horizon, saying that "exceeded ma stay period" any template for me to make appeal please?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Enterprise 850 Euros for a small scratch


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2268 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I rented a car from Enterprise Rent-a-car. When I returned it there was a small scratch, just a little bigger than their wear and tear vs damage assessment template allows for:

 

https://ibin.co/3WJPCUlUuaeK.jpg

 

They want to charge me the full 850 euros excess for this. It looks like the sort of thing that could be fixed for around 50 to 100 euros, with a localized touch up. Clearly I am being ripped off.

 

It is entirely possible the scratch was already there. It was a long day and I did not have any lunch by the time I got off the ferry and waited for the French to finish their lunch and re-open their rental office. I may easily have missed it. I did ask them to send me the last 5 return slips so I can check the same scratch has not already been billed for... but they did not respond at all to my polite email to the accidents email address they gave me.

 

What can I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do your T&Cs say regarding the Excess/Damage, and also Jurisdiction (i.e. is this a French contract governed by French law)?

 

Their UK T&Cs say:

 

If the vehicle is damaged you must pay, the Fair Market value for repairs, admin fees, loss of revenue (your daily rate of hire), an amount for diminution in value & any towing/recovery/storage fees.

 

And goes on to say:

 

If you have the Damage Waiver you'll not be liable for damage, save for paying the excess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What do your T&Cs say regarding the Excess/Damage, and also Jurisdiction (i.e. is this a French contract governed by French law)?

 

Their UK T&Cs say:

 

If the vehicle is damaged you must pay, the Fair Market value for repairs, admin fees, loss of revenue (your daily rate of hire), an amount for diminution in value & any towing/recovery/storage fees.

 

And goes on to say:

 

If you have the Damage Waiver you'll not be liable for damage, save for paying the excess.

 

Yes, a french contract under french law.

 

My French is not that good, but I am pretty sure it says the same thing. I did not take the damage waiver as it was 20 euros per day and it was a 10 day rental; seemed a bit much. It would seem they are trying to automatically charge me the full 850 excess, rather than a fair market value for the repair.

 

I think I will phone customer service to begin with and see if they can get me a fairer quote. There were other anomalies with the rental, specifically they charged me for 3 child seats when I only had 1. Customer service did already sort that out for me and I got a refund for 2 of them. However, it does say something about Enterprise's operation in Cherbourg - they are out for everything they can get.

 

Also I had booked the thing online there was no mention of having to leave an additional deposit upon collection, but I had to hand over another 250 euros on the day. So far this rental has cost me 350 for the ten days, 250 deposit not returned, and now a demand for another 600, making a total of 1100 to hire a horrible Citroen that I did not like at all.

 

My first and last experience of Enterprise rent-a-rip-off. I would highly recommend avoiding their operation in Cherbourg at least.

 

I am just wondering what happens if I refuse to pay? Ultimately it goes to a court in France, I am not likely to attend a hearing there, so I will lose. Would it then be marked against me as a CCJ or something along those lines?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no

pers i'd put them to strict proof to prove it was not there upon hire.

 

don't go blindly paying them.

 

did you pay by debit card?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,

I asked for last 5 out/return slips to check the scratch was not already there.

No response.

Won't be blindly paying them.

 

I paid by debit card,

I cancelled that card as soon as they emailed me about it, so no more payments can be taken on that card.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Canceling the card is a myth

If they have set up a CPA

Ring your bank and ensure a continuous payment arrangement is not active in their name

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whether the scratch was you or someone else is for you to argue with them.

 

But the cost of 850 Euros is about right.

 

Loss of hire for 1-2 days

Cost of transporting vehicle

Rub down and preparing the WHOLE panel for spraying.

Etc etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah right.

 

I had the clutch replaced on my car, engine oil seals replaced, engine steam cleaned, and timing belt done, all for about the same amount of money.

 

In fact I have done a lot of car work myself including rebuilding an engine, replacing a gear box, and so on, so I know an awful lot about cars.

 

A minor scratch like that does not require a whole panel respray, a good body work restorer could do a localized touch up in a few hours and you would never notice it.

 

Also, they don't repair them for minor damage like that.

They write the cost off against loss of the final sale value of the vehicle once it reaches the end of its life with the rental company.

So no cost to transport vehicle or 1-2 days lost earning.

 

There has been a lot about this in the news recently, so we are all aware of how they operate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It matters not how much the actual cost of the repairs is - in the UK at least - since Coles v Heatherton it is well established that vehicle damage is a claim for diminution in value - general damages (i.e. the loss in value of the vehicle) and not special damages (a repair invoice).

 

It's all a bit inconsequential until you know what the repairs cost and whether they are more or less than the excess. When you know that you'll be in a better position to know how to tackle this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

If they have set up a CPA

quick general Q re cpa.

can a co. 'charge' for cancelling (opt out) cpa (eg when it has been auto applied re auto ins. renewal) for eg under their policy 'terms' re change in policy/payment details fee.

thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

insurance policies don't use CPA afaik ford

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crikey, I used Enterprise just before Christmas and highly recommend them, this was in the UK, they did push me to take out the excess cover but I said no thanks.

 

As regards the scrape, I have had a close look and at least 80-90% is a lacquer scratch and five mins with some compound paste and a damp cloth would make it almost disappear and fall within their golf ball damage.

 

I would email their customer service dept direct and state that you could remove the largest part of said scrape with compounding paste and for a company with such fantastic customer service reputation you feel let down and taken advantage off.

 

Apart, from that I believe they have you over the proverbial barrel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could start a discussion thread, Ford. :)

 

HB

no, it's ok

was just asking., to know ooi after looking into cpa.

can take my posts out then.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...