Jump to content


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1783 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You attend the hearing....and you should have been called in last time.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 133
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You attend the hearing....and you should have been called in last time.

 

Yes I know I should have been called in last time Andy but I wasn’t and it didn’t go against me.

 

The reason why I am asking if I HAVE to attend this time is because I am very ill and this sort of thing makes my illness even worse so I was wondering if I could send a letter to the Court for the hearing rather than turn up in person?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best you do and protect your corner and given your case is rather complex. you would be on hand to give oral evidence..This is an application hearing only and separate to the normal process...I doubt you would be in there more than 15 mins.

 

You can and should submit a statement anyway in objection with reasons to their application to strike out...this must be filed and served not less than 7 days pre hearing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

No they would need a CCJ, with a value of more than £600.  They could be contacting as pure Debt collectors, in which case they have no power to do anything other than send letters and if they sent someone round you could tell them to go away.  To help give best advice; could you give some background to this?  As in is there a debt, and who is it to.  For safety check your Credit Rating with someone like Noddle or Clearscore to see if anything is on there.  It's not unknown for a faulty trace to come up with the wrong Mr Jones who has a CCJ and append it to another Mr Jones in error.  Other Caggers will be along soon with further and alternative advice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, they already seem dodgy because they sent me a letter saying “I write further to our previous notice of enforcement sent to you in relation to the above High Court Writ Of Control” but I haven’t had any previous correspondence from them. 

 

Also, I have checked my credit score with Clearscore, Noddle and Check My File (who include Callcredit, Crediva, Equifax and Experian) and none of them show a CCJ. 

 

I’ve also checked Trustonline and again there is no CCJ.

 

I’ve heard bad things about Court Enforcement Services/Elliott Davies based at Loughton IG10 9GL but appear to be registered at Monument Street, London EC3R 8LJ (along with lots of other companies of the same ilk). 

 

Im worried because their letter states an Enforcement Agent has been instructed to attend my property to take control of goods. Obviously I’m not going to let them in without a warrant but I’m also not obliged to even answer the door but my real worry is if they clamp our vehicles.

 

Do note however that they say Enforcement AGENT not Officer, I believe they are not the same.

 

The debt is due to a Civil matter with an individual not a company although he has a solicitor working on his behalf and I’ve been a litigant in person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You dont let them in anyway!!

There is no right of forced entry on civil debts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

But if they have a warrant I HAVE to let them in.

I’m honestly more worried that they will find our cars and clamp them.  Can they do that without a CCJ in place and without a warrant?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you dont

where have you read that rubbish??

can we see this letter please

scan it to PDF only 

read upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX is correct, no right of entry at all, they can seize goods outside, cannot climb in through windows anymore, they will try to Take control of a motor vehicle though.  As per DX please post up the letter, they could be acting as Debtt Collectors and be being naughty.  We need a bit more background to point you in the correct direction.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the letter.

Please remember, this is the first correspondence I have received on the matter. I haven’t received any forms from the Court (which I believe I should have been issued with for a CCJ) and I have received no correspondence from the claimants solicitor regarding payment.

 

Scan 28 Apr 2019.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you had a County Court appearance on this matter regarding any claim? 

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the letter.

Please remember, this is the first correspondence I have received on the matter. I haven’t received any forms from the Court (which I believe I should have been issued with for a CCJ) and I have received no correspondence from the claimants solicitor regarding payment.

 

 

I didn’t appear at the last appearance in February. My counterclaim was struck out on that occasion and I was to pay the claimants costs. I received an N24 stating this.

There has been no correspondence from anyone since then but as far as I know the original claim is still ongoing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would contact the  Court first thing Monday, it's possible there is something regarding the costs that might be more than £600, and they are going after unpaid costs. Something strange here.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you didn't receive anything the they've gotten a backdoor CCJ, you wont find it unless the address is linked to your credit file or you search that address on trustonline.org.

 

Iweill suspect this is to do with

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A backdoor CCJ is where the court documents are sent to a previous address, and the Claimant gains judgment by default.  They then miraculously find your correct address and Enforce the judgment there.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, High-value claims can be started in the High court and judgement issued. Also, many  Statutes require it. CPR7 I think. 000Some legislation forbids it also like the CCA 1974, count court only.

 

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES TO COLD CALLERS PROMISING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS

DO NOT PAY UPFRONT FEES FOR COSTLY TELEPHONE CONSULTATIONS WITH SO CALLED "EXPERTS" THEY INVARIABLY ARE NOTHING OF THE SORT

BEWARE OF QUICK FIX DEBT SOLUTIONS, IF IT LOOKS LIKE IT IS TO GOOD TO BE TRUE IT INVARIABLY IS

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is so wrong. There must be lots of people out there who owe more than £600 who suddenly get a visit from the bailiffs.

 

So I won’t actually have a noticeable CCJ on my credit file if this is the underhanded route they have taken?

 

I have no assets inside my tiny home but I’m very worried about the vehicles. One belongs to a vulnerable person (disabled) and the other belongs to a sole trader. Is there anything I can do to protect them? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are not yours so they cant touch them.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

many court documents are not redirected

some even say this on the envelope - do not redirect

so RM have a habit of not redirecting any now

seen this time and again here

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

they are not yours so they cant touch them.

The vehicles belong to me and my husband so we do own them but I need mine to get around (I’m disabled but awaiting a Blue Badge) and my husbands is for his business which he can’t run if he doesn’t have it. 

What can we do to stop them from being clamped?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lock them in a garage or parkthem away from your property.  As soon as you have the Blue badge, make sure its on display, they cant clamp it then

 

 would phone the Court Monday and ask them for details of claim and judgment, have a feeling its Forthwith, as in pay immiediately, it wouldn't show on the register until 28 days after the judgment.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven’t got a garage and I believe they still find vehicles if you park them somewhere else. I’m more worried about the business vehicle. Is it true that they can’t touch a vehicle which belongs to a limited company? If so, would we be wise to change my husband from a sole trader to a limited company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...