Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can My UK Debts be enforced in Aus


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2443 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I was wondering if this works the opposite way?

If you owe a bank in the UK can you be issued a Court Claim in Australia for the debt?

 

Sorry I'm very new to all this....i did see in my agreement in states

'The terms of the credit agreement are governed by English law and subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts'

 

Is this what it's referring too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep.

 

Aussie courts are not as helpful to foreign creditors.

 

 

If you reside in Australia and are threatened with a court claim, get local debt advice.

 

 

Such threats are probably just that and they would never bother.

 

 

If you leave debts in the UK and mive abroad, always advise creditors of your foreign address to avoid a CCJ by default in your absence.

Much easier to transfer a UK CCJ to a foreign court.

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your reply UncleBulgaria67 :-)

 

if my bank is fully aware of me residing in Oz and therefore unable to issue a ccj,

they could still apply to the Australian courts to enforce repayment of my debt..?

 

my story is that i owe around £25k to one particular bank,

I also owe a few other debts to another bank and a store card but at a much lower amount.

 

 

The £25k is made up from a £8k credit card and a personal unsecured loan that was paid off over 5yrs and then was topped up leaving now £17k.

I have never missed payments until now.

 

 

3 months ago I came over to Oz to visit my mother who lives here,

she has been suffering from depression and I didn't know how bad it was until I came over.

 

 

I am a single parent of 3 and as my oldest had not long finished school and my 2 youngest are under 3 (big age gap lol)

we decided to come over for a few months holiday

 

 

but now the kids have actually settled here (they love it)

and my mum has her grandchildren

and is alot happier and hates the idea of us leaving

 

 

I've come to the conclusion that we are staying lol (why not! I'm dual nationality so have the right to live here)

 

really any money I have atm has to go to us setting up home and I just can't afford any of the repayments now without any income coming in.

I will be starting to look for part time work once we're properly settled as my mum will be watching the kids

(I don't think she could cope with full time) and then i will go into full time when they go off to school in a few years.

 

what I want to know is with that amount of debt is it more than likely they will apply to an Ozzy court if i stop repayments?

Or if they choose to sell to a debt collectors over here what then happens?

 

 

As I said I've 3 children in the household and need to make sure we're all safe and not going to be harassed...

 

Sorry this is all so new to me

 

 

, thank you for bearing with my story.

 

 

Any advice would be so greatly appreciated. Thank you x

Link to post
Share on other sites

UK banks or original creditors will never apply for a CCJ.

 

they'll flog it for 10p£1 to a fleecing DCA

 

they might well

theres no way you'll ever get done in AUS with a UK CCJ

so i'd go enjoy your new life.

 

simply write to each original creditor

from AUS

 

inform them you are now resident there and are not returning

you have no money nor any assets to date.

but might consider replayment from OZ when you get your delf/mum/the kids sorted.

end off

dont waffle

don't tell 'em too much

the point of the letter is they have been notified of your AUS address.

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jurisdiction and Proper Law

 

(1) This Agreement is governed by the law of England and Wales, and is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.

 

or

 

(2) This Agreement is governed by the law of England and Wales, and is subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales

What is a Jurisdiction and Proper Law clause?

 

This is the part of a contract where the parties agree on which legal system (from which country) applies to an agreement, and which court will hear a dispute that comes out of the agreement. Jurisdiction means, in very basic terms, the court that can be used to enforce the agreement or deal with a dispute under the agreement. Law means, simply, which law the court will apply (i.e., the law from a certain country).

 

In example (1), above, the law applied will the law of England and Wales, and any proceedings between the parties in connection to the contract must be brought only in the courts of England and Wales. That is, a party couldn’t go to a court in France to try to enforce the agreement, even if the French court used English law to interpret it.

 

In example (2), however, the law applied is still going to be the law of England and Wales, but it could be possible for a party to bring proceedings in a foreign court. This might be useful if one party would find it easier to bring an action in another country,rather than travel to England.

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy.

 

So it is very possible for them to take me to court over here? Sorry if it seems if im repeating myself, I just want to know possible outcomes to my situation.

Edited by Rayar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends if the agreement you signed has clause no 2 in it

I don't think I've ever seen that

 

They always have clause 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes dx it does have clause no 2.

 

'The terms of the credit agreement are governed by English law and subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the English courts'

 

I am very worried now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Andy.

 

So it is very possible for them to take me to court over here? Sorry if it seems if im repeating myself, I just want to know possible outcomes to my situation.

 

Yes they could take you to court in Australia. There is a commonwealth debt agreement between UK and Australia. Australian courts will hear cases under English law, if your credit agreement does not restrict it to UK courts only. According to your first post, the agreement is non exclusive to UK courts, so can be subject to foreign court action, if the foreign court allows it.

 

BUT the more important question is whether it is likely. I very much doubt it. UK Banks have enough problems enforcing debts belonging to UK residents. What tends to happen is Banks go through their own debt collection for months or years. They then sell or assign the debt to UK debt collection agencies. These agencies might realise you have left the UK and you end up on a list of uncollectable debts. It might eventually end up being sold to an international debt company, but years later. By the time they get around to thinking about using an Australian company to bring proceedings there, it might be too late ( limitations act) or they decide it is not worth it.

 

Debt collection is not that efficient. What is possible, is not always likely.

 

Just remember to keep creditors informed of your latest address for reasons already mentioned above. At least they have no excuse not to write to you and you are aware of anything important.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The applicable law is this

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/23-24/13/contents

 

This would allow UK court judgements to be transfered to Australia. Hence why you don't want default CCJ's in your absence because you never formally told creditors you left the UK. Keep creditors informed of an Aussie address and make them use an Aussie court, if they are allowed to go direct to an Aussie court. Not sure they can, but you would need to get advice in the Aussie state where you reside if this was ever attempted.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again Uncle.

 

I have informed them im abroad as i was going to be away for a few months so now I just need to update them that I am remaining here permanently.

 

May i ask with them being aware I am no longer in the UK, would this not speed them up to just forwarding the debt straight to an Australian company or court? Does a Australian company have the right to take me to court because of the previous clause stated? And with regards to limitations act, would it be better to stop paying anything now or is it better to try give them a token to avoid court all together?

 

Sorry it just seems from old posts I've read it was...

 

Make creditor's aware of overseas address = no ccj

No ccj = unable to enforce debt abroad

Likely to sell on but dca in new country = no jurisdiction

 

But my situation seems to be different and I can't find any info relating to this anywhere else but this forum so thank you everybody for any info you have given or can give me regarding this.

 

***I have only just seen your last post, thank you for that. I will give it a read. If they go to a Australian court is it a ccj they will be seeking?

Edited by Rayar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you again Uncle.

 

I have informed them im abroad as i was going to be away for a few months so now I just need to update them that I am remaining here permanently.

 

May i ask with them being aware I am no longer in the UK, would this not speed them up to just forwarding the debt straight to an Australian company or court? Does a Australian company have the right to take me to court because of the previous clause stated? And with regards to limitations act, would it be better to stop paying anything now or is it better to try give them a token to avoid court all together?

 

Sorry it just seems from old posts I've read it was...

 

Make creditor's aware of overseas address = no ccj

No ccj = unable to enforce debt abroad

Likely to sell on but dca in new country = no jurisdiction

 

But my situation seems to be different and I can't find any info relating to this anywhere else but this forum so thank you everybody for any info you have given or can give me regarding this.

 

Banks are not very efficient enforcing debts. The have thousands of debts. They write off debts against tax, they sell them on eventually. It is just a numbers game.

 

You would think they would just pass to Lawyers in Australia, but it does not work that way. A Bank debt collector has no authority to start doing deals on collection with Aussie Lawyers. It would be a decision for someone higher up the ladder, but i doubt they take decisions on individual debts and are just interested in top level stats.

 

If a debt buyer was to ever issue a court claim in Aus, it would be years into the future and they would get an Aussie law/debt company to take it forward if they thought it was worth it. I can't remember reading of UK consumer debts being enforced in Aus.

 

If you have left the UK and need to secure your future in Aus, you might decide to stop paying. From a limitation act point of view, this makes sense, as making payments just extends possible enforcement further into tne future.

 

All the people i have come across on CAG with UK debts, have only had hassle from communications to their Aussie address and no court claims have ever been made against them.

 

Make any social media such as Facebook or Linkedin private and only advise the current original credtors know your Aussie address. There are some debt collection agencies abroad, who will use Facebook or Linkedin to try to embarrass people into contacting them, where they will hassle them into paying. They will try to avoid using court and use other tactics which would not be acceptable in the UK, such as phoning or faxing pla e of work found on social media.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry one more question lol

 

They have my current Oz address but we are in the process of moving to somewhere bigger to accommodate everybody, is it ok to give them an Australian PO box number for correspondences?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Rayar.

 

I'm glad the guys have been able to reassure you. Please keep posting with your questions if you need to. :)

 

If you want to thank anyone in particular, you can click on the little black star in the grey strip at the bottom of a relevant post and leave a short message.

 

HB

  • Confused 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry one more question lol

 

They have my current Oz address but we are in the process of moving to somewhere bigger to accommodate everybody, is it ok to give them an Australian PO box number for correspondences?

 

Always provide a residential address, as a PO will be seem as an attempt to hide and you can't in a PO box.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thank you, that makes sense.

 

I was wondering can any of this affect your credit score in Oz? I've always had a great score in the UK and would hope to build one up in Oz..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thank you, that makes sense.

 

I was wondering can any of this affect your credit score in Oz? I've always had a great score in the UK and would hope to build one up in Oz..

 

Each country has a separate credit record, so UK record would not affect you.

 

The only potential issue is an Aussie Bank asking you to provide details of your UK history. If they did this, when you applied for say an mortgage, i would guess your UK record might not be helpful. But i have read that Aussie Banks are normally only interested in Aussie information e.g your Aussie Bank, Aussie employment. Australian Banks are currently lending excessively and property prices have increased more than many parts of the UK.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Uncle, that's good to know in regards to credit scores.

 

And I don't think i will be in a position to be able to afford to buy a property for a while, hopefully by then my debt would have become SB ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...