Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA Request - CapQuest/Vanquis


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2419 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Created a new thread for all correspondence I receive from Capquest and any questions relating to it that I can't find answers for. I hope this is OK.

 

I sent Capquest a CCA request on 20th July via recorded delivery.

They received it on 21st July.

 

My understanding is they then have 12 working days to provide the CCA (+2 two days for delivery). with that in mind, unless they provide that CCA the account would be in dispute on 10th Aug, yes or no?

 

I received a letter Friday 4th Aug dated 3rd Aug saying they have forwarded my request to Vanquis and will send it to me as soon as they have it.

 

I also received a letter today, dated 4th Aug saying I've recently raised a query on my account, and they've placed my account on hold for 28 days and have contacted Vanquis for further information. If they haven't had a response by 31 Aug they'll write to me again with an update.

 

at what point is the matter in dispute/default/unenforceable?

 

Does it matter that they write and say they're still looking for it?

Or do they literally have 12+2 days to provide me the CCA and if they don't (regardless of them writing to say they are still waiting for Vanquis) the account is in dispute/default/unenforceable?

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Finally got a reply from Capquest a couple of days ago with a reconstituted credit agreement.

 

Personally, I can't see anything glaringly incorrect to deem it unenforceable,

I would very much appreciate if someone else could give me their opinion.

 

My address at the time I took the card out was added and is correct.

Attached a PDF to this post with the CCA.

 

They've sent the application form,

one sheet summary of credit agreement

and a several pages long agreement and full terms

(which I've only included the cover page of in the PDF).

 

My credit file says the account was opened Jan 2008.

The CCA has a headed witht the date of Dec 2007.

 

Thanks for your time.

 

- Teeny

 

From my understanding, that does contain the prescribed terms?

Unless anyone can see anything amiss...

 

am I right in that,

unless they can actually produce the actual signed copy in court

- they can't do anything about pursuing the debt,

apart from making a lot of noise?

 

I highly doubt they have the original signed documents.

 

If a borrower has not signed the agreement (or rather, they no longer have that signed agreement) containing all the prescribed terms,

the agreement will not be enforceable without an order of the court and section 127(3) requires the court to dismiss the application for an enforcement order?

 

Laymen terms - If they have no signed original document,

they aren't going to take me to court,

as the court can't do anything without it?

 

Maybe I'm understanding that all wrong?

Vanquis CCA.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you are saying you did sign an agreement

but what they've sent is NOT a copy of it?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

got it online?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then tick box is ok

we've never seen anyone produce that as a CCA return for an online vanquish card I don't think.

can you scan all of it please

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so where the recon of the supposed tickbox that you signed up online

just because so little twerp at capquest has gotten a generic copy of the vanquish stuff out of their filing cabinet and typed your AD at the correct place in the T&C's does NOT mrean that's an enforceable recon

IMHO its NOT

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What makes you think it isn't enforceable?

 

As I say, there's a possibility I applied online, was approved then they sent a CCA for me to sign and send back. I'm trying really hard to remember, but I just don't.

 

My concern is if they try taking me to court.

I want to avoid that, obviously.

 

From what I've been reading, lack of the original signed CCA or even a reconstituted one doesn't really matter in recent cases.

 

Judges argue a credit agreement must have been entered into, and that's enough grounds to pursue.

So it's getting them on technicalities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but theres no indication that is was or wasn't online

might be deemed enforceable under the CCA Act

but

I very much doubt a judge would deem that sufficient to enforce any judgement in court

its come out of their filing cabinet and had your details added by them.

 

there several more bits of documentation they'll need like NOA and DN for that .

 

tell us the history of the card

how much

have you all the statements

charges?

 

ppi/rop to reclaim?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, DX, what does NOA and DN stand for?

 

To the best of my knowledge I took out the card in 2007.

 

In terms of paperwork I have or don't - I don't have any statements.

The oldest document I have is an Impact Collections letter from April 2011 for a debt recovery instruction.

Payment due around £300, balance around £2k

 

Another from Impact in July 2011 saying they agree to my payment agreement of £10 a month.

 

Letter from 1st Credit November 2011 saying to contact them about the account.

 

Letter from 1st Credit November 2011 agreeing to token payment arrangement.

 

February 2012 reply in response to me requesting refund of default charges.

They say prepared to offer £300ish, sum represents total sum of charges applied to account plus interest.

Please confirm full and final settlement of my claim.

Includes a list of summary charges including overlimit charges and late charges.

 

I have a photocopy of my agreement and signature for this that I sent back Feb 2012.

It appears I used all the refunded charges towards the account.

 

Letter from Vanquis January 2013 saying in respect of the almost £2,000 in November 2012 my account was sold to Arrow Global.

 

Jan 2013 letter from Arrow Global saying balance is around £2,000 please make payments to them.

 

Letter from Debt Managers Services LTD Sept 2016 saying I can have 40% off settlement offer.

 

Letter from Debt Managers Services LTD Sept 2016 saying I can have 40% off settlement offer.

 

Letter from Arrow June 2017 saying as of 3 days prior to date letter headed with that Debt Managers LTD will no longer be managing my account on behalf of Arrow Global (I've been paying Arrow Global).

 

What does this mean to you?

The balance still owed to Arrow Global is x.

Then get in touch with Capquest.

Then "How we work - Arrow works with a number of agencies who manage accounts on our behalf.

Capquest Debt Recovery will manage your account from x.

 

Letter dated June 2017 from Capquest thanking me for continued payments.

As of x Capquest will be managing account on behalf of Arrow,

and that it was previously managed by Debt Managers

(I paid Arrow who have the same account number as Debt Managers as same company, just like Capquest is still Arrow).

Saying all future payments should be made to Capquest, no paying details included.

 

July 2017 I wrote back to Capquest (probably stupidly) saying I know you and Arrow are one of the same.

Requested new payment details as they didn't include them.

Included income/expenditure which showed -£6 month deficit, therefore will only pay £1 a month.

 

July letter from Capquest saying thanks for setting up payment plan.

 

July letter from Capquest saying thanks for advising them of my current circumstances (sole income from ESA etc due to long term illness).

If they'd like them to take this into consideration when dealing with my account, please provide them with medical evidence.

This should be signed by a qualified medical professional dated within the last 12 months.

 

August letter from Capquest saying they have forwarded my CCA request to Vanquis.

 

August letter from Capquest saying I've raised a query on my account and they've placed my account on hold for 28 days

and contacted Vanquis for the info.

End of August letter from Capquest with CCA agreement.

 

I've paid £1 token payments to Impact/1st Credit/Arrow/Capquest since 2011.

It has not changed amount.

I stopped all payments when I requested the CCA,

I have not restarted them.

 

To my knowledge, I didn't take out PPI with the card.

Link to post
Share on other sites

god

if you'd not paid that stupid £1PCM from 2011

the debt would now be SB'd

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

really...

I take it you've been taking to DCA's on the phone then...

 

 

why do you think Vanquis, that are ofcourse part provident etc etc

didn't take you to court themselves..

after all they're a big company and could easily crush you...

 

 

urm...I wonder why they sold it to a 10p to the £ debt buyer....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://cse.google.co.uk/cse?cx=partner-pub-8889411648654839:6449422593&ie=UTF-8&q=claimform+vanquis+card&sa=Search+CAG#gsc.tab=0&gsc.q=claimform%20vanquis%20card&gsc.page=1

 

 

in all the court claims we've seen here we've never seem that CCa return ever

don't think its ever appeared in any other vannquis thread here either

its bogus cut n paste

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well arrows are capquest

they've issued many claimforms

not seen them win

 

 

i'll suspect, as I've indicated, that that CCA has come from Capquest filing cabinets

else Arrows on the claims they've made would have already made it appear.

 

 

pers i'd let this run.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As in, just discontinue all action and let them scream all they want?

 

Am I correct that they can't threaten legal action unless they are actually going to do it?

And if they did threaten it, I have a chance to make an offer of settlement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can threaten all they want nothing to stop them.

 

 

I question the want to settle anything.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but that would happen anyway.

don't wanna be paying fleecers if they've no enforceable paperwork.

 

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

 

 

let the judge decide not your scattered brain.

doesn't mean you'll end up with a CCJ

you can always tomlin it if it looks like its not going your way

which is no diff to thinking about paying it now

leaves no markers and doesn't result in a CCJ.

 

 

please don't be scared of powerless DCA's

 

 

they have no more legal right to bring a CCJ than you do

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...