Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Kevin Adey Car Sales, Tockwith, York -taking 2nd hand car dealer to small claims court - help please***Paid in full***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2360 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

 

I bought a 2nd hand Nissan X trail on 13th January from a local dealership. On 6th February I reported to the dealer that the car was making a loud noise from under the bonnet and that the engine management light had come on. We agreed to send it to my local Nissan dealership for them to run a diagnostic check. They diagnosed the fault code as an EGR fault and said that the noise could be coming from a worn turbo. They advised replacing the turbo and intercooler.

 

 

After speaking with the dealership I bought the car from, I returned the car to them to investigate and they diagnosed a worn turbo which they took over 2 weeks to replace. They acknowledged the EGR fault, but did nothing to rectify it as the engine management light had gone out.

 

 

Upon receiving the car following the new turbo, the noise was still there. I reported this again only to be told its to be expected with a car of this age and mileage. Over the past 3 weeks the noise has gotten worse and the engine management light has come on again. I have had 2 garages look at the car for me in the last few days and both say that the gear box is shot and that the EGR fault is still there and the EGR valve needs replacing.

 

 

I have written to the dealership rejecting the car under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, but after speaking to them this afternoon I fear that they are just going to ignore me and try to fob me off. He is all ready talking about trying again to fix it.

 

 

Do I have to accept this? or is there anything I can do to force the refund?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you should start off naming the dealer.

 

It's a shame that you didn't exercise your short-term right to reject in the first 30 days. This would have given you an automatic right to return the car.

 

Now you are exercising your limited right to reject which means that you must give them one opportunity to repair the vehicle as long as you exercise your right within the first six months of ownership.

 

Although they have already had an opportunity to repair, it seems to me that because you haven't formally exercise your right, you should do so in writing and give them a final opportunity to repair. If they refuse to do so or if the repair fails then you are entitled to a replacement or refund.

 

From what you say, the dealership – so far unnamed – are refusing to honour your consumer rights. In that case, your only option is to send them a Letter before Action giving them 14 days to pick up the car and to refund you or you will begin an action in the Small Claims Court and without further notice.

 

I'm assuming that you paid less than £10,000 for it.

 

Only make the thread if you intend to carried out. If you don't intend to carry it out then frankly if they stand their ground and there will be nothing that you can do.

 

Assert your right. Give them the one chance. Then issue the letter.

 

On the basis of what you say, your chances of success are much better than 90%

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have had nothing back in writing from the dealership (Kevin Adey Car Sales, Tockwith, York), but I have spoken to him on the phone several times. the car has been sat at a garage after the dealer requested further diagnostics. It has now been identified as s the timing chain making the noise and I have been advised that its ready to fail. The garage cannot get the car booked in for 2 weeks and want £1200 for the work. After speaking with the dealer, he is offering to pay half of this cost, but no more. He will also not provide a courtesy car/hire car for the period whilst I am without the Nissan.

 

 

I now have the car parked up in the drive at home and without a car and am looking at sending a letter before action as its been over 2 weeks since I sent the original rejection letter.

 

 

Before I send the letter am I right in thinking that under the consumer rights act, it is up to the dealer to pay the full cost of the repair. He is trying to tell me that he doesn't have to pay anything and that by offering to pay half he is going above and beyond his obligations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Earlier this year I purchased a Nissan X-trail from a 2nd hand car dealership. The vehicle was 11 years old with 138,000 miles on it, but was described as in excellent condition.

 

 

Within 3 weeks of collecting the vehicle the engine management light came on and the car was sounding very rough. After reporting it to the dealer it was agreed that I would take the car to my local Nissan garage for them to diagnose. They diagnosed that the EML was due to an EGR fault and that the noise could be due to the turbo been worn. They also advised that the intercooler was leaking oil and required replacement or the turbo & intercooler.

 

 

The seller took the car back for 3 weeks and fitted a new turbo, but claimed the EGR fault was non existant and the intercooler was fine. The day after I got the car back, I reported the noise was still there, but was told it was a 11 year old car and that they make noises. Over the next 3 weeks to noise got worse and the engine management light re-appeared, so I got it looked at by 2 different garages for them to diagnose the EGR fault is still present and that the noise is due to the timing chain about to fail. I then rejected the car under the Consumer Rights Act 2015 but the dealer refused this and instead offered to put £600 towards the repair bill, but I would have to arrange all repairs etc. I was quoted £1200 alone for the chain, plus an unknown sum for the EGR fault as it needed more investigating. Add to this the fact that the Intercooler is still leaking and I pushed for a refund/rejection but the dealer wouldn't budge.

 

 

I have now filed a small claim against the dealership (named the dealership and the owner as he is a sole trader and not a limited company). I have the following evidence to supply when it goes to court.

 

 

Copy of receipt & report for diagnostics work from local Nissan Dealership.

Report from another garage of investigation work they undertook and their diagnosis of EGR fault and timing chain issue.

Quote from 3rd garage for cost of repair for timing chain.

 

 

As I am new to this whole thing and have never had to make a claim before, is there any other evidence I may need? Also do I need to quote relevant sections of the Consumer Rights Act / supply copies as evidence?

 

 

Thanks in advance for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done on actually making the claim. Many people don't.

 

Please will you post up a copy of the claim that you file – in PDF format.

 

I'm assuming that you have had no acknowledgement or defence yet.

 

How long ago did you file the claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that you should start off naming the dealer.

 

It's a shame that you didn't exercise your short-term right to reject in the first 30 days. This would have given you an automatic right to return the car.

If the buyer notified the seller of the fault within the first 30 days, doesn't the "Right to reject" get suspended until the fault is rectified? I think it is know as the "waiting period". Perhaps the vehicle is still within the 30 day rejection period?

 

If the buyer requests a repair or replacement in the 30 day period, the time period stops running during the "waiting period" while the goods are being repaired or replaced. That waiting period begins with the day on which the buyer requests or agrees to the repair or replacement of the goods, and ends with the day on which they receive the goods back. The buyer then has 7 days in which to reject the goods or, if later, the original time for exercising that right, extended by the waiting period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mariner51 said:
How old is the vehicle?

How long have you owned it?

What is current mileage?

 

 

 

Its got 140'000 on at the moment and is 11 years old.

 

BankFodder said:
Well done on actually making the claim. Many people don't.

 

Please will you post up a copy of the claim that you file – in PDF format.

 

I'm assuming that you have had no acknowledgement or defence yet.

 

How long ago did you file the claim?

 

 

The claim was filed a month or so back. The seller has entered a defence. The court have set a date for in October.

 

I am away from home at the moment, but will upload the court claim form when I return.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Copy of the claim form should be attached. Do you want to see a copy of the defence the seller has filed?

 

Yes please.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please see below for the defence that the seller has filed.

 

I believe I have worked with Mr ??????? over the past four months to resolve any issues following the purchase of the Nissan X-Trail and dispute his right to a full refund.

 

All vehicles sold by Kevin Adey Car Sales come with an up-to-date MOT and are fully serviced before customer collection. Mr ??????? also gave the car a thorough test drive before purchase. At no point throughout the MOT, test drive and service did there appear to be any unusual noises which could have revealed any issues with the Exhaust Gas Recirculation Valve (EGR), timing chain or turbo. Had there been a problem with the EGR when the car was purchased, it would have failed its MOT.

 

Used vehicles are also sold on the understanding they are subject to levels of wear and tear commensurate with their age and mileage. The agreed sale price of £3300 reflects the fact the above Nissan is 11 years old and had done more than 135000 miles as at January 13 this year. Like the majority of 2006 cars with a relatively high mileage there is also the chance certain parts may need replacing due to natural usage levels.

 

I have always endeavoured to help customers if it transpires there is a particular issue with a vehicle purchased from Kevin Adey Car Sales which was not present at the date of sale. On being contacted by Mr ???????? on February 6 this year regarding a noise from under the bonnet - and following subsequent investigation by Trenton Nissan in Hull - I took the vehicle to Tockwith MOT Centre for further examination.

 

They carried out checks on the turbo/EGR and found excessive play in the bearing in the turbo so it was replaced with a new unit. After a further on-road test, this resolved the issue while no warning lights indicating an EGR fault appeared. The £200 bill for the checks and repair as well as the £650 cost of a new turbo were paid by myself. To minimise inconvenience to Mr ????????, I lent him a car while the Nissan was being repaired.

 

I heard nothing further until March 28, 2017 when I was informed Mr ??????? wanted to reject the vehicle and receive a full

refund due to what was believed to be an issue with the EGR and the timing chain. Had there been a problem with the EGR when the car was purchased, it would have failed its MOT.

 

I subsequently offered to work with him to resolve any problems - even though the faults became apparent several weeks after sale - and after speaking to the Engine Repair Centre in Hull agreed to pay £600 towards the cost of replacing the timing chain. Mr ??????? was not happy to accept this offer which I confirmed in a letter to him in May, 2017.

 

After already spending £850 on repairs in February following Mr ???????? purchase and collection of the vehicle as well as

offering £600 towards subsequent repairs, I believe I have done more than enough to resolve these issues and feel he does not have the right to a full refund of his purchase price.

 

By working with me, he means he has had me run around several garages trying to get the issue diagnosed. I have paid all diagnostic fees and when asked for reimbursement was told no.

 

He also fails to acknowledge that I reported the engine was still making a noise and running rough the day after I got it back from the turbo been replaced (I have email proof of this, including his reply).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Well we had a day out to the court yesterday. The seller turned up, but the Judge found in my favour. She has given him 14 days to pay what is owed and to collect the vehicle.

Do I now just wait to hear from the seller and if nothing has happened after 14 days, escalate it upto the high court enforcement officers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well we had a day out to the court yesterday. The seller turned up, but the Judge found in my favour. She has given him 14 days to pay what is owed and to collect the vehicle.

Do I now just wait to hear from the seller and if nothing has happened after 14 days, escalate it upto the high court enforcement officers?

 

Yes :-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you will receive a Notice of Judgment in your favour with the payment deadlines

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done miley..thread title amended to reflect the outcome.

 

Please consider making a donation to help us to help continue to help others.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • BankFodder changed the title to Kevin Adey Car Sales, Tockwith, York -taking 2nd hand car dealer to small claims court - help please***Paid in full***
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...