Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • It's Hotpoint (but I believe they're part of the Whirlpool group now?). The part was bought direct from them as a consumer.
    • Thanks BankFodder for your latest, I'm in complete agreement on the subject of mediation and will be choosing to decline mediation, the longer timeline is not an issue for me, I will happily let the going to court run it's course. I really appreciate the support from the Consumer Action Group. I'll post the email text I'm sending to Evri's small claims in answer to their recent defence response. Regards, J    email text I'm sending to Evri's small claims in answer to their recent defence response:  
    • Sec127 (3) repealed, now gone. S. 127(3)-(5) repealed (6.4.2007) by Consumer Credit Act 2006 (c. 14), ss. {15}, 70, 71(2), {Sch. 4} (with Sch. 3 para. 11); S.I. 2007/123, art. 3(2), Sch. 2
    • We used to recommend that people accept mediation but our advice has changed. The mediation process is unclear. Before you can embark on it you have to agree that you are prepared to enter a compromise – and that means that you agree that you are prepared to give up some of your rights even though you are completely in the right and you are entitled to hundred percent of your money and even though EVRi are simply trying to obstruct you in order to discourage you and also to put others who might want to follow your example off from claiming and even though they have a legitimate basis for reimbursement. Mediation is not transparent. In addition to having to sign up that you are prepared to give up some of your rights, you will also have to agree not to reveal any details of the mediation – including the result of the mediation – so that the whole thing is kept secret. This is not open justice. Mediation has nothing to do with justice. The only way of getting justice is to make sure that this matter goes to trial unless EVRi or the other parcel delivery companies put their hands up and accept the responsibility even if they do it is a gesture of goodwill. Going to trial and winning at trial produces a judgement which we can then add to our small collection to assist other people who are in a similar boat. EVRi had been leading you around by the nose since at least January – and probably last year as well – and their whole purpose is simply to drag it out, to place obstacles in your way, to deter other people, and to make you wish that you'd never started the process and that you are prepared to give up your 300 quid. You shouldn't stand for it. You should take control. EVRi would prefer that you went to mediation and if nothing else that is one excellent reason why you should decline mediation and go to court. If it's good for them it's bad for you. On mediation form, you should sign that you are not prepared to compromise and that you are not prepared to keep the result secret but that you want to share the results with other people in similar circumstances. This means that the mediation won't go ahead. It will take slightly longer and you will have to pay a court fee but you will get that back when you win and you will have much greater satisfaction. Also, once you go the whole process, you will learn even more about bringing a small claim in the County Court so that if this kind of thing happens again you will know what to do and you will go ahead without any hesitation. Finally, if you call EVRi's bluff and refuse mediation and go to trial, there is a chance – maybe not a big chance – but there is a chance that they will agree to pay out your claim before trial simply in order to avoid a judgement. Another judgement against them will simply hurt the position even more and they really don't want this. 300 quid plus your costs is peanuts to them. They don't care about it. They will set it off against tax so the taxpayer will make their contribution. It's all about maintaining their business model of not being liable for anything, and limiting or excluding liability contrary to section 57 and section 72 of the consumer rights act.     And incidentally, there is a myth that if you refuse mediation that somehow it will go against you and the judge will take a dim view and be critical of you. This is precisely a myth. It's not true. It would be highly improper if any judge decided the case against you on anything other than the facts and the law of the case. So don't worry about that. The downside of declining mediation is that your case will take slightly longer. The upside is that if you win you will get all your money and you will have a judgement in your favour which will help others. The chances of you winning in this case are better than 95% and of course you would then receive 100% of your claim plus costs
    • Nice to hear a positive story about a company on this form for a change. Thank you
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard PPI and linked cards ??


Pank
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2213 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear All,

 

I filled out the online form for Barclaycard to reclaim my PPI, which I never realised that I had.

 

I get a reply this week enclosing a copy of a letter dated November 2014 that apparently they sent me when I applied for return of PPI the last time??? I have zero memory of doing this and I am not convinced they are telling me the truth.

 

In any case they are telling me that nothing was miss sold and I am not getting any money back.

It seems like a generic letter and they have used internal and external evidence to reach this decision.

They have also included the "linked cards" that where on my account?

 

I have no idea what the linked cards are.

Does anyone have any ideas?

 

I am about to send a new letter to Barclays advising them that I never received the letter dated November 2014,

can they please provide copies of all credit contracts between barclay card and myself

and also copies of all the evidence internal

and external that supports their case so that I can take this case to the next stage.

 

I would also like supporting evidence that shows me that the PPI was not missold.

 

I have advised that i will take the case to the BO.

 

Has anyone else had a similar situation?

Does anyone have any experience as what has happened once they get a letter asking for the supporting evidence?

Finally what linked cards?

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

SAR them. Otherwise theyll just fob you off. A sar compels them to provide ALL info they hold on you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry? What do you mean them?

 

 

Is my letter the equivelent to an SAR or do I need to do a new one?

 

Doh, see what you mean now.

 

Thank you I will send one of them as well.

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I have sent my letter and I have sent a SAR with a £10 postal order.

 

It was sent special delivery arrival today.

 

It seemed a bit more secure and serious :)

 

Does anyone have any experience with the same as me and have any timeline experiences?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have 40 days as the sar says!!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pank,

just chuck my two-penneth in here.

 

I had the same thing regarding "linked cards" with Barclaycard.

Im currently awaiting a SAR pack to hopefully see what these cards actually are.

 

Now heres something to think about

- when I first applied online for a PPI refund they said I had paid £24.99 on an old Egg card as a one-off payment and consequently refunded me £187.

 

Ok I thought, not a brilliant result but not a bad one too.

 

However, one year later I got another cheque from them for £1087.00 with an apology for a miscalculation of the original PPI refund

 

. I cant wait to see what these "linked cards" are!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, I have sent my letter and I have sent a SAR with a £10 postal order. It was sent special delivery arrival today. It seemed a bit more secure and serious :) Does anyone have any experience with the same as me and have any timeline experiences?

 

did you send a blank postal order? I am wondering if it needs to be addressed to anyone or if blank will do, thanks

 

Hi Pank,

just chuck my two-penneth in here.

 

I had the same thing regarding "linked cards" with Barclaycard.

Im currently awaiting a SAR pack to hopefully see what these cards actually are.

 

Now heres something to think about

- when I first applied online for a PPI refund they said I had paid £24.99 on an old Egg card as a one-off payment and consequently refunded me £187.

 

Ok I thought, not a brilliant result but not a bad one too.

However, one year later I got another cheque from them for £1087.00 with an apology for a miscalculation of the original PPI refund

. I cant wait to see what these "linked cards" are!

 

I believe linked cards include cards that expired as I had a letter confirming my policy and a linked card and through some digging found that it was just an expired card that links to the account

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you send a blank postal order? I am wondering if it needs to be addressed to anyone or if blank will do, thanks

read the sar thread link

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

last sentence post 3 on the link

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it doesn't

Read it properly

If its going to a dca..

 

..its not

you put their name

 

you sign it!!

 

Simple logic surely???

 

Dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hello,

 

Barclaycard are ignoring my questions in my letters and are just re sending letters they apparently sent me in 2014, which I have never received.

 

I have sent my SAR but this has not been acknowledged.

 

Do they acknowledge or should i just wait and see what happens until the 8 weeks?

 

If I do not receive anything in 8 weeks what would be my next step?

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

has the 40 days expired yet?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

simply ring and ask how you sar is doing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello,

 

I rang Barclaycard PPI department this morning to ask of the progress on my SAR request.

 

He told me they can not give it to me and I would have to phone the Data Protection team.

 

I was told that they did not have a phone number for them only an address, yeah right!!

 

Does anyone have the number for me>

 

Has anyone else been fobbed off like this?

 

Any ideas of next action?

 

Found this and is sending an email, worth a try!

 

Privacy and Data Protection Manager Barclaycard Legal and Regulatory Compliance Dept LRC

Tel: 01604 835418 c/w 2500 5418

Mobile: 077755 47353

Fax: 01604 254150 c/w 2500 4510

email: Natalie.Page@barclaycard. co.uk

 

Has anyone got any ideas as to what i should no next?

 

Or how long should I wait to see if Natalie Page replies to me.

 

If she does not what should i do?

 

Has anyone else had this happen to them?

 

Can anyone help me please with some suggestions as i am at a loss now.:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

What address did you send it to?

Have you moved since taking these cards out?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Answer post 21 then!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry DX100UK answer has just popped up.

I have been at the same address for the last 12 years and the previous letters they supposedly sent to me was sent to my current address.

 

I sent my request to

 

Barclaycard

Customer Relations Department

PO Box 9131

51 Saffron Road

Leicester

LE18 9DE

 

Help please :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Again,

 

Thank you dx100uk. I emailed and contacted last week

Privacy and Data Protection Manager Barclaycard Legal and Regulatory Compliance Dept LRC

Tel: 01604 835418 c/w 2500 5418

Mobile: xxxxxxxxx

Fax: 01604 254150 c/w 2500 4510

email: XXXXXXXX@barclaycard. co.uk

 

 

I am still waiting for a reply pls see post 18.

Can someone give me any idea as to what I should now do?

My SAR was sent 55 Days go and I emailed Natalie page last week.

 

What is normally the next step?

 

Many Thanks

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

Use this - https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387319-Failed-SAR-No-Reply-40-Days-Have-Expired-**Correct-as-at-October-2013**

 

A letter is what you need to send now. Get a free Cert of Posting at the PO when you send it.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...