Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord refusing for a transfer of property - Equality Act 2010??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2175 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Myself and my disabled wife (registered) live in a housing association one bedroom flat.

My wife suffers with spinal degeneration and needs a bedroom for herself because she in pain in during the nighttime when trying to sleep.

 

We have spoken to our doctor who was very supportive and wrote a letter to the housing association stating that living in our current tenancy is no good for my wife, there is also a social problem with a new neighbor who is affecting my wife's mental state of health which was also mentioned in the supporting letter.

 

We contacted the housing association and requested that we wished to find alternative accommodation.

The housing association arranged for an occupational therapist visit and her report was way over the top,

 

her recommendations was for a gradual sloped access with hand rails both sides of the pathway,

my wife uses a walking stick and does not use handrails and there is no problem at our current property without hand rails.

 

A wet room was also one of the recommendations in case my wife's condition got worse over the years,

again she is coping fine with our current bathroom with a walk in shower.

 

We were informed that we could only apply to be re-housed with a property with all of these adaptions in place.

We thought that this would be OK until we found that the housing association has very little stock of these type properties and we may have to wait years for one to come available.

 

We asked if we could apply for a general needs property instead because there are more of these type properties in stock and if necessary we would carry out any minor adaptions with the help of social services at our own cost.

We would not be interested in any properties with difficult access like lot of steps etc or any major mobility issues..

 

Our request was turned down by the housing association and they were adamant that we can only apply for a disabled property,

which is stupid because we are living in a non-disabled property and we coping fine except for the lack of the extra bedroom.

 

I am wondering if the housing association can turn our request to be re-housed down in a general needs property?

The Equality Act 2010 states that the landlord has a duty to make reasonable adjustments if required.

I am no expert in this law, anyone able to advise on this act?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your complaint seems to be that the HA has taken (& wishes to act on) expert advice.

 

If so, the HA is open to complaints whatever they do:

If they

a) don't take advice,

b) take advice and act on it,

c) take advice and don't act on it.

 

It seems they are "damned if they do, damned if they don't"!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jazztheman

 

I can appreciate where you are coming from having some years ago to my own medical condition having to apply to move properties with my HA for Medical Reasons.

 

What you need to be fully aware of is most HA in the UK only have a set amount of Disabled Adapted Properties and that they have an Allocations Policy in place that sets out the process and yes it can take some time for a suitable property to be available.

 

As you wish to move for Medical Reason the big thing here is medical evidence that the move is actually required for that medical need generally yes a HA will look at a doctors/gp recommendation but it is not a hospital consultant.

 

If you are under a hospital consultants speak to them tell them the issue be open they are there to help and if they could do for your HA (if you are each under different hospital consultants then seperatly ask each more evidence the better)

 

Now even if you have these letters the HA may play it does not say you need this or that so you simply inform your consultant that done the letter and if they could amend and re send to HA.

 

Write to the HA and ask them for a copy of:

 

1. Customer Care Policy.

2. Allocations Policy.

3. Complaints Policy.

 

(ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office and to keep a good paper trail)

 

What you need to do if you disagree with there decision is to follow the HA Complaints Procedure as you must fully exhaust this first before you can proceed to the Housing Ombudsman.

 

The best advice is if either of you are at present under a hospital consultant is to explain the issue to them and if they could do a letter make them aware of the problem.

 

You also need to be aware that even if they upgrade you status for housing allocation it may still take some time before a suitable property is available to the HA stock of properties so you need to be aware of this as well as it took me some years before a suitable property became available and in the meantime I had to do with different adaption at my old property.

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

The HA provided some one (Occ Health?) to recommend alterations, which HA seem willing to provide

I don't know if you can use the Disablity Act to force them to provide another 'general needs' property, other than what you already rent.

They seem willing to provide a disabled property, but not prob within your localty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jazztheman

 

I can appreciate where you are coming from having some years ago to my own medical condition having to apply to move properties with my HA for Medical Reasons.

 

What you need to be fully aware of is most HA in the UK only have a set amount of Disabled Adapted Properties and that they have an Allocations Policy in place that sets out the process and yes it can take some time for a suitable property to be available.

 

As you wish to move for Medical Reason the big thing here is medical evidence that the move is actually required for that medical need generally yes a HA will look at a doctors/gp recommendation but it is not a hospital consultant.

 

If you are under a hospital consultants speak to them tell them the issue be open they are there to help and if they could do for your HA (if you are each under different hospital consultants then seperatly ask each more evidence the better)

 

Now even if you have these letters the HA may play it does not say you need this or that so you simply inform your consultant that done the letter and if they could amend and re send to HA.

 

Write to the HA and ask them for a copy of:

 

1. Customer Care Policy.

2. Allocations Policy.

3. Complaints Policy.

 

(ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office and to keep a good paper trail)

 

What you need to do if you disagree with there decision is to follow the HA Complaints Procedure as you must fully exhaust this first before you can proceed to the Housing Ombudsman.

 

The best advice is if either of you are at present under a hospital consultant is to explain the issue to them and if they could do a letter make them aware of the problem.

 

You also need to be aware that even if they upgrade you status for housing allocation it may still take some time before a suitable property is available to the HA stock of properties so you need to be aware of this as well as it took me some years before a suitable property became available and in the meantime I had to do with different adaption at my old property.

 

Thank you for your information.

 

The problem is not the evidence of my wife's health condition. HA have recognised that there is a sufficient evidence for the need to move under medical grounds and they have classified the move to be under the urgent category. However, there are very limited if any disabled properties available, and then there may be a waiting list for other disabled tenants who are also under the urgent category.

 

There are a much higher numbers of General Needs properties with the same HA and are suitable but may need minor adaptions like grab rails etc, unfortunately the HA are adamant that General Needs properties are not available for people with disabilities due to the lack of adaptions, which is why I am questioning the Equality Act 2010 which indicates that landlords cannot refuse the installation of minor adaptions for the disabled. Whether this act applies moving to a potential property I do not know? But it does seem like discrimination against the disabled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Your complaining because the HA are taking onboard all of you and your wife's needs and future needs but does not have a suitable property.

Minor modifications are allowed but from reading in-between the lines it sounds like a property would need much more than minor modifications

Link to post
Share on other sites

My complaint or gripe with the HA is that the major adaptions that they are recommending are unnecessary and will not be used.

 

We were only informed of the outcome of the HA OT report a few weeks later, the problem now is that we can only apply to be re-housed in disabled properties with major adaptions and there are none available or a very long wait.

 

The HA have recognised that we need to be re-housed urgently, unfortunately by putting us into the severely disabled category will only result in a very long wait and therefore not urgent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

The OT has to consider the future of your wife's condition when writing her report.

 

As she has a deteriorating condition there is no guarantee when she might need the recommended adaptations but on the balance of probabilities she will.

 

If the housing association offer to act on the recommendations of the OT in your current property, or has offered for you to be rehoused in a suitable property then they could argue that they are making reasonable adjustments as outlined in the Equality Act 2010.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be great if jazztheman could provide us with an update on how this issue is progressing.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be great if jazztheman could provide us with an update on how this issue is progressing.

 

As feared we are still living in the same property, due to the lack of vacant disabled properties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for the update, sadly that does happen if there is no disabled properties available you are placed on a waiting list.

 

Have you tried speaking to your hospital consultant to do a letter as I mentioned in post#3 there letter have more weight even if it moves you up that disabled properties list.

 

I went through similar some years ago and it took some yrs and it ended up with the hospital surgeon threatening my HA as they were now questioning his professional standards and qualifications, was amazing how fast things changed when I handed them that letter.

 

If you ask the Hospital Consultant to do a letter for you need to be specific in what you need as it has to be in there letter i.e. 2 bedroom, Ground Floor, Any adaptions i.e. walkin shower, ramps, wheelchair access etc.

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no issue proving that my wife's disability justifies the need to be re-housed. The housing association have also acknowledged that we need to be re-housed and have classified our application to be urgent.

 

We now find ourselves in the position that there is little chance of us being re-housed due to the lack of disabled housing stock.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...