forget it

ignore them

again, they cant pass it to their clients solicitors becasue they have no authority to do so.

If i emloyed an estate agent to sell my house they cant instruct a solicitor to deal with my business.

the most they can do is tell the client that they havent had a response and so have failed to earn their commission

Hi I have now received the attached letter from QDR solicitors. From my research they seem to be debt collectors but also solicitors (owned by Wright Hassall). So I suspect I should not be responding but am not entirely clear whether this letter has moved things to the next phase. Advice gratefully received.

QDR letter 20.10.17.pdf

there isn't a next phase

they cant do anything

only the originator can

read it properly..doesn't say WILL ANYTHING

dx

you have obviously read my musings on this co,

they are NOT OWNED by right hassle but by a coupe fo people who are registered as solicitors as practising there.

Completely separate co's but the tie in is good enough to send curt letter suggested.

Do your homework,

it is all in the public domain so look up companies house beta for searching their roll.

The SRA have their own roll of people entitled to work as solicitors so another port of call should you get a letter from Mr Schwarts/Swartz or even Ashley Cohen pretending to be him.

if you want to play letter tennis you can tell them that they are obviuously crap solicitors as they would otherwise know they cannot act on behalf of a third party in this matter and they should tell their clients that they are being dishonest in their claim to represent anyone.

Dont change the wording, they dont deserve politeness when they are engaging in fraud and misrepresentation.

Hi I have now received the attached letter from QDR solicitors. From my research they seem to be debt collectors but also solicitors (owned by Wright Hassall). So I suspect I should not be responding but am not entirely clear whether this letter has moved things to the next phase. Advice gratefully received.

I'm sorry if I'm being dense here.

Should I definitely be responding to this letter?

The letter is still full of "may" do this and that.

I would prefer not to respond if that doesn't put me at a disadvantage as I don't want lots more letters.

Could you clarify on this please?

I checked the company as suggested on companies house beta and see their nature of business is not solicitors and they were previously called Quantum Debt Recovery Ltd.

The letter says in tiny writing in bottom left hand corner "A wholly owned subsidiary of Wright Hassall LLP"

Life is pretty stressful for other reasons right now and I am so grateful for the time and support I'm getting on this.

until/if you get a letter before claim

you can ignore them

I've hidden that letter above

your name is on it

Thanks - never quite redact the whole thing correctly!

should you be responding to the letter?

Only if you feel like being rude to them as suggested above in post #30,

they have no interest in the matter and no magical powers.

As for their CH listing, they dont appear as a subsidiary of right hassle

so perhaps they forgot to obey the Companies Act by placing that link on their registration

( mind you CH might not have updated any amendment submitted)

This is NOT a lba so can be ignored if you prefer that course.

Tempting though it is to send the rude letter I will await any lba; thanks and have a good weekend

And there was me thinking they'd forgotten about me. Another letter from QDR with similar content to the one from October. I will not be responding but am posting it to keep things up to date.

Hillingdon station pcn QDR letter.pdf

ZZPS cant instruct anyone to do anything..........

as said, ZZPS cant instruct anyone....

. that makes the rest of the letter even more hollow.

It is also against debt collecting guidelines to threaten such rubbish

so you could complain to the FCA and the SRA about this but neither organisation will use its powers to punish them for being lying gits

At least some of their ill gotten gains are being reinvested into the post office