Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

West Brom mortgage charges done..now MPPI reclaiming...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2295 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you both. I will write to them and ask for clarification of various insurance amounts against the appropriate dates. One of them does disappear before 2000 so it may well be the buildings insurance then.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Heard back from them advising loan protection insurance was held from inception to almost 2000 when the insurance was cancelled.

 

They state they only have limited information as to why it was cancelled.

I probably found out it was not appropriate as I wasn't working then relying on maintenance payments!!!!

 

I really don't have the mental ability to go for maximum amount

I could get through the courts

I would use the 1st spreadsheet

- is that right

- and I won't enter an end date on that spreadsheet.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received the following from west brom

 

Thank you for your email dated 28 September 2017 regarding the loan protection insurance premiums.

 

Due to the length of time that has passed since the mortgage redeemed the data we hold in our department is limited. The mortgage statements we hold for the time the mortgage was held, do not differentiate between the two insurances linked on your account. What you need to do next

 

If you are seeking this information in order to make a complaint regarding the miss-selling of these insurance policies, we can forward your request on to Customer Relations who will be able to look in to your complaint and may be able to provide you with additional information.

.

The statement shows a start date in 1988 with yearly insurance premiums totallling 274.40 yearly advising of a renewal date in 1994 (what?) with monthly mortgage payments including an insurance premium of £38.40.

 

 

Their answer above seems vague so I am proposing using this £38.40 as my monthly PPI figure

 

 

- am I correct?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree to let them fwd it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

They sent me a PPI form so I'm going to send it back. It does say my ex-partner may be entitled to some of the refund - he signed the house over to me and we have no contact - is the fact we divorced relevant to my claim?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

in all cases id always use the FOS CQ not their one

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you - I should have said they did send me the FOS cq.

 

 

Will just have to wait and see if I get all the money or just my share up to when I divorced and then the full allocation. Better than nothing, whatever.....................

 

I have saved a copy of the cq just in case I need to apply to the FOS.

 

Damm -

they have sent me another qs.

To investigate the PPI they say they need the agreement of the other party

- well he lives in America and signed the mortgage package over to my solely in the 1990s.

Any suggestions?

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

any proof he did

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a copy of my solicitors letter dated 13 January 1998 to the BS regarding 'their (me and my ex) proposed discharge of the society's mortgage.

 

 

Would you please let us have the title deeds upon our usual undertaking not to part with the same pending discharge of the mortgage and to return the same to you upon demand.'

 

Then there is another letter dated 21 July 1998 in reply to a BS letter apparently dated 14 July in which my solicitors advise they have received no further instructions for the time being from myself with regard to the transfer of the property into the joint names and that they are returning the Deeds. It also states they will apply in due course if I proceed (in what?)

 

We divorced in 1998 and in a letter from to BS February 2004 I advise that my ex had signed over the endowment policy and mortgage to me alone

 

 

as I was not working the BS took the decision to keep his name on the policy

(they sent me a copy of this so are they delaying things in an effort to get me to stop).

 

Then finally I have found a letter in with my name only in 2004 on the mortgage due to the fact I was remortgaging elsewhere.

 

Is this sufficient proof

- don't they have to do some checking if I bring this to their attention with my sending copies of the above?

 

They settled my original claim for unlawful bank charges without bringing up my ex so they must have been aware of the mortgage situation then as I went back to when it was a joint mortgage.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so short answer is no you haven't

 

PPI is not like penalty charges

 

Its personal protection Insurance

he was obv named on the policy.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sad fact is is that he was paying for the mortgage whilst he was with you

unless you've got a signed letter witnessed by say your or his solicitor at the time that he signed the home over to you

then that's a dead duck.

 

 

as far as i'm aware they don't need HIS permission to investigate

but might well think he could be owed 50% of any sums refunded.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My solicitor did get him to sign the house over to me (being in America he didn't bother with filing for divorce, just ordered me to get it done in this country)

 

 

wouldn't the BS have had a copy of this and I think he possibly had to sign some paperwork (so long ago I'm not sure) when I wanted to remortgage.

 

 

I'll phone them tomorrow and ask the question.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

good looking better then..

 

 

just be aware they are only going by what the FCA/FOS dictate they have to do

in this instance they are not purposefully being obstructive

 

 

though as I said

theres nowt on either FCA/FOS regulations or whatever

that state they cant INVESTIGATE,

 

 

just with regard to any resultant payment

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Spoke to society

their line is that as the policy was sold to us both at that time

they need confirmation of his new address/residency as he may be entitled to 50%.

 

Luckily we are on civil terms (after meeting at a family funeral)

 

I have sent the sheet for him to complete and send back to BS

- lets see what happens between now and christmas.

 

If he sends it back after the 8 weeks are up I will just need to fill in a questionnaire again.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

well done!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...