Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Coin dealer


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2472 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

i bought a coin from a dealer for the sum of £550,

only to find out 3 weeks later that the same type of coin can be bought for around £10,

 

 

i brought this to the dealers attention along with lots of proof yet he has declined to refund me,

stating that it was properly described (as it was),

he has a 7 day cooling off period to return but that was out of time,

 

 

i have bought coins off him before and trusted that his price reflected the coins scarcity,

at no point did he try to sell me this coin

i picked it from his list of my own free will,

 

 

is there any thing i can do,

i brought this to his attention within 30 days if that is any use,

i also found out he is not a member of the British Numistic trade association to my horror,

 

i suppose the moral of the story is be very sure what you are buying,

 

we have come to an agreement where i return the coin and he takes off £190 which is the price he paid,

he is buying it back for £360,

but thats only because i said i would come to his house after numerous emails asking if he would take the coin back were ignored,

 

i am still not happy with this outcome and want my full refund,

this is a lot of money to me,

considering they have maybe around a £1,000,000 in stock and are a major dealer,

 

also the £550 came from some coins i sold to him,

he gave me £600 for which i was happy,

i bought 2 coins the one for £550 and one for £50

 

many thanks for reading this

 

craig

Link to post
Share on other sites

how can he charge you for him being s.cammed of £190!!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how can he charge you for him being s.cammed of £190!!!

 

that was my suggestion as i was getting no where,

ignoring my emails messages on facebook etc,

 

the last thing i wanted to do was call them because i'm not very good in these situations,

i get flustered and stuff shaking, raised voice etc,

 

his business partner was saying i'll like what he has to offer then he had nothing to offer,

same when i sold him my coins,

 

i wanted to swap for some thing that was £700 ,

he said they could do that or get very close only to offer me £50 (£550) more once he had the coins,

 

i had a bad feeling then,

but i still trusted him as a someone i had bought from before,

in the end we split the difference, £600 (i did think there would be some bargaining)

 

could kick myself,

The £190 thing is the only way i can see of cutting my losses,

the coins i sold him had a face value of £373 (Olympic 50p's the £2 coins and 50p's with pictures on)so its not as bad as it seems,

so insted of me getting £600 for them it looks like i'm only going to get £410, (£50 for the other coin)

 

what is it they say

 

Caveat emptor - let the buyer beware

 

and he will make a tidy profit of my coins and get to sell his coin again to another person,

better i found out now then in ten years or summit

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, unless he misdescribed the coin by giving out false information, you completed the sale for an agreed price.

At that point the contract is sealed and I don't think you can claim that the coin is not fit for purpose.

The fact that you could have bought it cheaper from somewhere else is totally irrelevant.

Also the fact that he's not registered with the British Numistic trade association is totally irrelevant: Anyone can buy and sell coins, even if that horrifies you.

So in other words, I think he's being very kind in taking the coin back.

Anyone else would just tell you to get lost.

Of course if he advertised the coin as a rarity or one of a kind and this is untrue, all gets switched in your favour.

But you need proof of this: Have you got any?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...