Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Customs seizure - advice for future travel


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2468 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I came through Gatwick yesterday from Tenerife.

Customs stopped and searched me.

 

 

I had 1000 ciggies instead of the 200 allowance and these were seized.

I accept I got caught etc.

 

 

Not complaining about the seizure, but now im guessing my card is marked, and I will be subject to future stop and searches in future trips.

 

 

My queztion is :

If im stopped in the future and nothing is seized,

can I legally ask the customs officer to record and log the search on a form as 'searched, nothing found'

as opposed to just being shuffled along and told to go?

 

 

Any advicr appreciated. Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does not work like that.

 

 

Customs will catch hundreds of people every day with excess quantities.

They might have recorded that on this one occasion they seized items, but you won't be specifically targetted in future.

You are not more likely to be stopped.

 

 

If you were stopped again and they found excess quantities of ciggies or alcohol, then they might use this previous seizure as part of a prosecution for a customs offence, but unlikely.

 

 

I think they only prosecute if the excess quantity is huge and you are bringing in such quantities to sell to gain significant income.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your reply. I would like to think that is the case, but in the past I know of 2 friends who were stopped and had ciggies seized. 1 had a similiar amount to me, the other had around a 1000 more. But both are regually stopped coming through customs to this day. Hence the 'is my card marked' comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

observation by customs is the thing from the collection area to passing thru customs, seen it so many times coming in from the Far East/China etc depends on flight I observed, any suspicious looks or actions attract observation.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes....I do realise that!! Basing this on the x ray theory tho I brought a 1000 in hand luggage as it was a short trip. Ive been previously on a longer stay with a full size case and had more. Im sure my full size case was also subject to being x rayed! Besides that anyhow, my actual question was if anyone knew if I could legally request customs to officially log any future searches that resulted in nothing being seized.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Besides that anyhow, my actual question was if anyone knew if I could legally request customs to officially log any future searches that resulted in nothing being seized.

 

How will that help?.

The fact that you've been stopped 20 times, and nothing found doesn't mean you won't be carrying anything on a future occasion (otherwise, smugglers would 'act nervous', get stopped multiple times, ask for these to be logged and then feel they could 'breeze through' with immunity in future).

 

You got stopped, and had items in excess of your allowance seized. You also admit you exceeded your limits previously (& we don't know if they X-rayed your bag then, and if they did if they didn't stop you then as they had 'bigger fish to fry' that day .....)

 

You may or may not get stopped in future ; I doubt you can influence that (other than by not giving them reason to stop you, either

i) by carrying in excess of your allowance, or

ii) not giving them 'behavioural cues' to stop you).

 

You may get stopped in future, and there isn't anything you can do about it (if they are acting within their powers).

If they stop you 200 times and find nothing that won't prevent them stopping you the 201st time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I asked is because I have been told if they continue to target you and find nothing they generally just say zip your case and go. But if you can get them to log the search that found nothing eventually you would stoo being targeted as im sure negative logged searches dont look that great for them. Asking on here as I dont know if its a fact or not, and hoping someone could shed some light on it rather than the "oh tough you got caught" type of comments. Obviously been a waste of time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously been a waste of time.

 

The waste of time appears to be trying to tell you how things are.

There would have been less waste of time if you had said at the outset "only bother replying if you will tell me what I want to hear".

Link to post
Share on other sites

The reason I asked is because I have been told if they continue to target you and find nothing they generally just say zip your case and go. But if you can get them to log the search that found nothing eventually you would stoo being targeted as im sure negative logged searches dont look that great for them. Asking on here as I dont know if its a fact or not, and hoping someone could shed some light on it rather than the "oh tough you got caught" type of comments. Obviously been a waste of time.

 

You are asking a question which even an off duty customs officer would not answer i.e how they operate. Having been caught once, they are not going to log each further time they carry out a search and no issue is found. Perhaps they do place markers against passports and every time you travel outside of the EU, you will be searched on your return. I don't think you have any legal rights to access what is held on customs records about you in regard to future customs operations work. I suspect customs and police have Data Protection exemptions in regard to what is held in regard to current or future operations. If this was not the case criminals e.g drug smugglers could ask to see all records that exist against their passport records.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

you flaunt the rules and get caught = hard luck , trying to be clever as some stage you will fail , persistant misuse of the law/rules then your up an commence will prevail, to be honest you need to get a life and stop acting like a spoilt child i.e. law for one and a law for another, we on these sites have need to help genuine people with genuine cases, good day! seems you may of been on the FOTL or looking for

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read my original post I wasnt bleating about the seizure. It was 'a fair cop'. But as for wasting your time, no one is forcing you to reply to this thread. Maybe you have too much time on your hands?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Plain and simple answer.

 

If you fail to check your allowance and go over the limit its your error.

 

Try to get more through customs and get caught again your error.

 

If you flaunt the rules and get caught it's your mistake.

 

This is what 'random' searches are for. They already know you have too much before you reclaim your bag.

 

I would travel to Amsterdam about 60 or so times a year, I would be stopped almost every time. Did it bother me? No! Why was I there? As a courier I would drop off/pick up aircraft parts for clients from Schipol Airport.

 

Just because the destination was Amsterdam most would think drugs! You'd be wrong in my case. Getting stopped at the BORDER is what customs do get used to it and don't break the law and hope to get away with it then complain!!!

 

Sorry to the OP and others but that's it plain and simple...

 

Don't like it? Don't do it!!

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you read my original post I wasnt bleating about the seizure. It was 'a fair cop'. But as for wasting your time, no one is forcing you to reply to this thread. Maybe you have too much time on your hands?

 

As far as I am aware, and I operate within an industry that has close connection with Customs the following generally applies:

 

If you get stopped at the border it will be most likely be as a result of a hunch, or the way you behave.... Officers are trained in recognising body langauage and other visual clues.... If they find cigarettes in quantities one could consider for personal use they will seize the excess and destroy them. A record will be made in the database noting your ID, the date, departure and arrival point and quantities involved. That's it.

 

You have exactly the same chance of being stopped the next time you travel as you did every other time you travel.

 

It is not uncommon for folk to have three, four or more seizures on the database and still they are not targeted.

 

There is no procedure in place that shares info and warns of the arrival of a casual exceeder....

 

Equally, there is no way you can have the record removed or amended to suit your own purpose.

 

You have no more or less risk of being caught than during your previous smuggling trip.

 

Just carry the allowance and next time you get stopped, IF you get stopped, laugh it off and tell them you learnt your lesson.

 

You have learnt your lesson, right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am aware, and I operate within an industry that has close connection with Customs the following generally applies:

 

If you get stopped at the border it will be most likely be as a result of a hunch, or the way you behave.... Officers are trained in recognising body langauage and other visual clues.... If they find cigarettes in quantities one could consider for personal use they will seize the excess and destroy them. A record will be made in the database noting your ID, the date, departure and arrival point and quantities involved. That's it.

 

You have exactly the same chance of being stopped the next time you travel as you did every other time you travel.

 

It is not uncommon for folk to have three, four or more seizures on the database and still they are not targeted.

 

There is no procedure in place that shares info and warns of the arrival of a casual exceeder....

 

Equally, there is no way you can have the record removed or amended to suit your own purpose.

 

If you want to continue smuggling your cancer provider then feel free to go ahead but on your own head be it. Alternatively, why not just carry the allowance and next time you get stopped, IF you get stopped, laugh it off and tell them you learnt your lesson.

 

You have learnt your lesson, right?

 

 

as indicated in para 5 above

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha ha. Yes I have. I dont even smoke. They were for my partner and relative. And yes a case of, ok got away with it this time. But had a smack on the wrist now. Anyway, thank you for your informative, helpful and non judgemental reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just going off at a little tangent here but

 

I was stopped coming back from Spain.

I had 16 cartons of cigarettes (all same brand) and 5 x 50gramme hand rolling tobacco.

Gov website RECOMMEND (not law) limits are/were at the time were

16 cartons and 60x50gramme tobacco.

They wanted to seize until I produced the gov recommended limits .

 

My case defense was....

I'm under the recommended limits

Here is the gov guidelines

They are all the same brand

I have all the receipts

I've paid the relevant tax in Spain

They are for personal use

I only travel once per year, check my passport.

According to European law you cannot restrict free trade within Europe.

 

After an hours arguments, perfectly civil, they rescinded with an apology from a senior manager saying the customs officer was being over zealous, and the recommended limit I just that, a recommendation not the law. Its up to customs to prove your selling or intending to sell not for you to prove its personal use.

Be careful tho, if you say your giving them to a friend or some one else they can seize as that's not personal use

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just going off at a little tangent here but

 

I was stopped coming back from Spain.

I had 16 cartons of cigarettes (all same brand) and 5 x 50gramme hand rolling tobacco.

Gov website RECOMMEND (not law) limits are/were at the time were

16 cartons and 60x50gramme tobacco.

They wanted to seize until I produced the gov recommended limits .

 

My case defense was....

I'm under the recommended limits

Here is the gov guidelines

They are all the same brand

I have all the receipts

I've paid the relevant tax in Spain

They are for personal use

I only travel once per year, check my passport.

According to European law you cannot restrict free trade within Europe.

 

After an hours arguments, perfectly civil, they rescinded with an apology from a senior manager saying the customs officer was being over zealous, and the recommended limit I just that, a recommendation not the law. Its up to customs to prove your selling or intending to sell not for you to prove its personal use.

Be careful tho, if you say your giving them to a friend or some one else they can seize as that's not personal use

 

It's not uncommon for an Officer who smokes to invite the miscreant out for a fag.... see if they turn green. It is also amusing to see a non smoker trying to roll one...... apparently. 😇

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh wow! Thats out of order. Id be fuming at that! What i cant get my head around is, its unlimited amount from mainland, but they may question you if its over 800. Yes they cost more from the mainland, but not that much more €15-20. Still half of UK price.

Edited by Dmw2000
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh wow! Thats out of order. Id be fuming at that! What i cant get my head around is, its unlimited amount from mainland, but they may question you if its over 800. Yes they cost more from the mainland, but not that much more €15-20. Still half of UK price.

 

That is because Canary Islands are not in the EU. The Canary Islands are a self governed territory of Spain. If you travel from Canary Islands to Spain, you have same customs restrictions as you would travelling from Canary Islands to UK.

 

The cig packets bought in the Canary Islands will have different wording on them regarding what tax duties have been paid.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...