Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
    • thank you you mean you got a notice of discontinuance? dx  
    • Thanks for your interest dx100. Didn’t reach a hearing. Although they filed court papers, they withdrew a few days beforehand, and admitted it was statute barred and I have it in writing that they say the matter is now closed. Once again, many thanks for all your help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Nolan Oridnary Cause - old BoS Credit Card [won repone already] **WON+COSTS**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2268 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Decree awarded in absence.

 

I have been advised to recall decree using a reponing note.

 

I am looking for advice or a template for this note as there is no standard form available from the scottish courts service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome Louix,

 

If you could give us some detail of the case it would help regarding the reponing note.

 

Regards,

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

no such thing as a degree awarded in absence..as such..

 

page 14 of the doc at the end of this thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?475116-You-have-received-a-SCOTTISH-Court-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**updated-April-2017**

 

lets have details first thought please

and why did you not receive the writ

it MUST be served person to person.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Disputed unrecognized entry on ClearScore report, what has changed section March 2017 below:

 

• You opened your CABOT CREDIT MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD (I) Your CABOT CREDIT MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD (I) account went into default

 

• You closed or settled your CABOT CREDIT MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD (I) account

 

Raised dispute with Clearscore who raised dispute with Cabot through Equifax.

Cabot advised 'this account relates to a BoS credit card by Lloyds account sold to Cabot Financial in June 2016. Please contact Cabot on tel.....

Phoned Cabot 5th May advised that court proceedings underway and that I can send letter to them via email.

 

Sent a CCA s 77-79 request same day & received automated confirmation email from Cabot.

Copy also send and signed for 14th June 2017

 

Requested further info from court, received copy of initial writ and decree granted in absence.

 

I did not receive any paperwork from Cabot/court as I moved house last year and was removed from the electoral roll April 2016.

 

Submitted reponing note to recall decree,

just received interlocutor case to be heard end of August.

Link to post
Share on other sites

old Halifax credit card I bet,

well if cabot have it there something dodgy about the debt

always is.

 

 

whats the history..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not recall any credit card/loan to any company for that amount...

 

within the writ it states

'on 4/9/98 the defendant entered an agreement with Lloyds TSB Bank PLC under which the defender borrowed from them a sum of money repayable on demand.

The said agreement was regulated under the CCA 1974...

 

the defender failed to pay as agreed on demand and is in breach of contract with the said Lloyds TSB Bank PLC.

The said supplier assigned all right in the said debt to Cabot Financial Lts on 24/4/16'.

 

How can that be when Lloyds TSB Bank PLC was not incorporated until 28/6/1999???

Link to post
Share on other sites

well they wont know any real history of the debt

which is why their statement of claim is very vague

 

all they get is a line on a debt portfolio buying list spreadsheet

they issue claims hoping for default judgements.

 

the original creditor name will be the name of the OC that sold them the debt today.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX

 

That will be why they have not supplied info requested under CCA s,77-79.

I have also requested info under DPA.

 

Non compliance with CCA request is the grounds for recall of decree.

 

I am confused as to the origin of the debt.

 

Presumably the info supplied to Equifax dispute resolution centre should be ignored and I should focus only what is in the writ.

 

Lloyds TSB Bank PLC was incorporated on 28/6/99 and ceased to exist on 23/9/13 according to Companies House.

 

How could they assign the debt to Cabot in 2016

Link to post
Share on other sites

you focus only what is on the writ yes brilliant idea.!

 

no CCA return will be fatal to cabot no matter what they do otherwise.

you have to remember

no human to this point would have looked at anything.

the decree was rubberstamped.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

yes so what did they claim in it

please fill this out:

best you can [its for the new spr system but an old decree is basically the same

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?475116-You-have-received-a-SCOTTISH-Court-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**updated-April-2017**

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

name the issuing court:edinburgh sheriff court now strathclyde previously

 

Who Is The Claimant: Cabot

 

Who Are the Solicitors: Nolans

 

What type of action? (simple/Ordinary): Ordinary

 

What is the claim for –

 

The pursuers crave the court-to grant decree against defender for payment by the defender to the pursuers for the sum of XXXXX sterling payable to the pursuers with expenses.

 

Condescendence

1.The pursuers aver that the defender resides as stated in the instance and has so resided at least three months immediately preceding this action. the nature of this residence shows a substantial connection with Scotland. Defender is domiciled as in the instance giving this court jurisdiction in terms of statute. To the knowledge of the pursuers there are no other proceedings pending before any court involving the present cause of action between the parties nor does any agreement exist between the parties prorogating jurisdiction over the subject matter of the present cause. Pursuers are as stated.

 

2. On xxxx98 the defender entered into agreement with Lloyds TSB Bank PLC under which the defender borrowed sum of money repayable on demand. The said agreement was an agreement regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

The defender failed to pay as agreed on demand and is in breach of contract with Lloyds TSB Bank PLC.

The said supplier assigned all rights in the said debt to Cabot Financial UK Ltd on xxxxx16 and the pursuers have advised the defender of the same

The last payment of account was on xxxx15.

The said sum of xxxxx is the sum sued for.

the pursuers have made frequent requests to the defender to make payments of the said sum but the defender has refused or delayed to do so.

 

3.The defender has delayed or refused to make payment of the sum due to the pursuers despite repeated application by the pursuers and this action is now necessary.

 

Last Date Of Service:-

 

Last Date For Response:- 13/10/17

 

What Documents are listed in Box E2:[or in your form requesting the same?] no forms only interlocutor

 

Is the claim for a Overdraft, credit card, loan account, HP Agreement, Catalogue or mobile phone debt - BoS credit card debt

Disputed debt with Equifax Dispute Centre, Cabot responded stating it was a BoS credit card debt this was confirmed by local solicitor at previous hearing.

 

D5 what has the claimant said]:

 

from your knowledge: answer the following:

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Before (1998)

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? No

 

When was you last payment:-N/A

 

Why did you cease payments:- N/A

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan ?No

Link to post
Share on other sites

does the Condescendence contain a 16 digit number

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

urm then how the beep can they prove what debt they are on about?

 

when have you to file our defence by?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Astonishing this bunch got a decree in absence as no defence lodged due to them using the wrong address.

Dirty tactics!

 

How many more people have they done this to without their knowledge?

 

I only found out when CCJ/Decree appeared on my credit file.

 

At last appearance in court the Sheriff specifically asked the local solicitor to clarify the origin of the debt.

 

Defences by Monday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

this Monday?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ya didn't say

 

ok what you need to do is here

 

https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?482558-What-To-Do-Ordinary-Cause-Action-Claims-Scotland(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

don't forget the 07 form if that's what you need..I would assume so I don't 100% know

 

MUST BE IN THE CORRECT FORMAT

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Defences lodged and intimated to pursuers within time limit.

 

No adjustments received from pursuer.

 

Options Hearing soon.

 

Should I be raising anything with court before the options hearing?

 

Will I receive a copy of record before hearing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

unless they do wish to amend their claim

there is nothing to exchange before the options hearing.

 

have they complied with your CCA request yet?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Adjustments were to be made by 26th Dec.

I have not received any notification of adjustments.

I never received a response to CCA or SAR.

 

How do I obtain the documents from them?

Do I ask the sheriff to order production of docs?

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar to whom not the DCA I hope?

have you made ref to failure to comply with CCA request on form 07?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...