Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arrow/Shoos SPC - Old NewDay Aqua Credit Card Debt ***Claim Dismissed no DN***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2162 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

i have sent the above letter to the solicitors and also a copy to the court requesting the case management date be moved due to my work commitments etc.

 

The court has came back with...

In order for a court hearing to be discharged/changed you would be required to complete the attached form and intimate said form to the claimant and to the court for consideration. This can be done by email.

 

When you lodge the application with the court you should lodge proof you have sent the application to the claimant.

 

The Claimant has 10 days to object to your application after intimation and if no opposition if received the sheriff will consider your application thereafter.

 

I replied asking if this applies to a case management discussion as it is not the actual hearing and they said..

 

As the hearing was assigned by a sheriff order this hearing will have been intimated to the claimants therefore an application would be required.

I am happy to put your email with the papers on 15th September 2017 and this will be considered by the sheriff but the case still requires to call in your absence.

 

The form they have asked me to complete is form 9G

 

I have also received a reply from the solicitors saying...

 

We thank you for your letter dated 16/08/17, and refer to its contents therein.

 

Our client is reliant upon the original lender to provide copies of the documents that you have requested.

Upon receipt of these documents, we shall endeavour to provide you with a copy for you to review.

 

Please note that our client has instructed us to proceed with the current action.

Until such a time as we receive further instruction, we shall not be discontinuing the claim.

 

We recommend that you seek independent legal advice.

 

Should i complete the form asking the court and the claimant to change the case management date as i am worried without me attending they might award the claim to them?

 

It looks like they might be struggling to locate the original agreement etc?

would the sheriff allow the case to continue without the paperwork they have based the claim on?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

there would certainly be no judgement made if you didn't attend

its solely a case management discussion.

 

cant see there being any harm in doing the form 9G

and sending proof you have emailed [intimated] this to the claimant.

 

you could also as a safety net reply to the offer of them to put your email with the papers forward on 15th September 2017

include a copy of the email from the claimant that states they've not to date found any enforceable documents etc.

 

eitherway , the sheriff will read that

even if the form 9G doesn't get sorted/actioned in time [ I can see the claimant objecting just to gander pressure over you]

and will defer to a later alternate date.

 

you have done everything you can then to not be seen to purposefully waste the courts time.

and that might well put the pressure back on the claimant

as the sheriff might well set a date whereby the claimant must produce the required documentation anyway

as would happen even if you weren't there.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I have received a letter from Arrow with the following

 

We thank you for your letter and acknowledge your request fir documentation pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974.

 

We do not accept that we are the creditor as envisaged by the above statute. However we are willing to assist in obtaining that which has been requested. we will now process your request for documentation from the creditor and will revert in due course.

 

We confirm that all collection activity will be suspended pending provision of the documents.

 

We hereby return your fee of £1

 

 

Does this mean the court action will now be put on hold until they come up with the documents or do I still need to continue as above?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

std reply to any CCA request sent to arrows

changes nothing

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's a std letter they send regardless to if court is on going or not

its autogenerated.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I completed the form 9g requesting the court action be suspended until the CCA request has been fulfilled and the Sols has completed it and accepted by replying.

 

 

" The Claimant respectfully moves the court to discharge the case management discussion fixed for 15th September 2017, and thereafter pause the action to allow for the respondents request under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 to be satisfied "

 

 

Now I am thinking should I have continued with the discussion as they probably wouldn't have the paperwork or should I just be happy the have postponed everything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have now received this from court?

 

Not sure if this is a good thing now as it gives Arrows plenty of time to come up with the documentation?

 

The court has received an Incidental Orders Application.

 

The sheriff has considered the Application and has given the following orders:–

 

Pausing Order

 

The sheriff orders the progress of this case to be paused.

 

This means that all upcoming hearings in this case have been cancelled.

No procedural steps may be taken in this case until the case has been restarted.

 

Either party can ask for this to happen by sending an Application to Restart Form to the court and to the other party.

 

Both parties should be aware that after six months, the sheriff clerk may write to you directing that a particular step should be taken.

 

If this is not done, the claim may be dismissed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dead then

you could send it an application to restart with regard to getting the case dismissed

but it looks like that gonna happen anyway

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

chin up

just got a letter to say one ive been dealing with on behalf of a neighbour that's been going on 2 yrs

ive just nad a letter from nolans saying they are going to dismiss the case.

tied them up in knots at 2 recent hearings.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

by the time you've instigated the restart the 6mts might already have been and gone.

 

pers I think you are batting from a strong wicket at present

inviting them to change bowlers for want of a saying

is not in your interest.

 

if you've not got all the statements

it might pay you to use this time wisely and get an sar off to newday

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

which you keep to yourself!!

 

 

you don't ever reveal it contents in any form or tell the claimant anything...yet..unless its useful to your case

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Today I have received a letter from the sols with statements of the account and the signed credit agreement.

 

They haven't included the assignment deed or default notices but I assume they would get these if they have come up with the rest.

 

Where do I stand now?

 

I assume they will reopen the case as they have the required evidence?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Scan up the return to ONE multi page PDF

Read upload

 

How's the sar going?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi it will be difficult to scan as it all contains personal information i.e home address etc.

 

it is the credit agreement signed by me and statements from the account.

There is a couple of notice letters letting me know I was behind in payments

but not an actual Default Notice and

No letter of assignment

 

I never got round to doing the SAR completely slipped my mind.

 

I would maybe be best trying to cut a repayment plan with them I think?

Link to post
Share on other sites

as does every agreement we ask people pop up

you have to redact it

read UPLOAD please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's compliant

but ofcourse doesn't meet the outstanding requirements of your 4a form

 

oh. but ofcourse you changed it didn't you !!!

 

which is why is SO important not to faff around with tried and tested defences.....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I’m confused what part did I change?

 

Maybe I should have attended the case discussion and the judge would maybe have gave them a time limit to come up with the documents?

 

What should I do for my next steps?

 

Negotiate payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...