Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see the poops are still trying to deflect from their own criminality and and abuses by whinging on about raynors buying her council house - now about election registration - anyone who owns a flat or house understands that you dont give up your and your childrens home just because of a new relationship and while we are on about that ..   lets start with When is jenrick being revisited for both lockdown abuses and self admitted (claims estate is his main home - not the property in his electorate or his london property) 'possible (lol) electoral registration abuses as he claimed he was at his estate 'main home' away from both London and his electoral 'home'  - much of which paid for by the taxpayer     Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick 'breaks lockdown rules twice' by going to 'second home' - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Key Cabinet Minister Robert Jenrick drove 150 miles to his 'second home' after urging the nation to remain in their homes in a bid to...   ... perhaps follow with more self admitted lobbying while in a potion where they shouldn't “A few of us in parliament have lobbied the government – and with the help of the Treasury select committee, the chancellor has listened,” John Baron wrote.   Tory MP faces lobbying questions over Treasury committee role | Investing | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Co-owner of investment management firm called for ‘urgent’ post-Brexit changes to City rules at committee meetings     About time labour got in the game and started pressing for these self admitted/bragged Tory abuses were properly investigates.
    • No I didn't I got the dates mixed up.   
    • Sorry about that, TJ. The person who posted it specifically said it was free access. Here's another version of the FT article. https://archive.is/KYrPa
    • Isnt there some indication in there of at least intent to inform arbuthnot? IF he wasn't then it would seem to be Vennells decision to keep him 'uninformed .. Although seems to me if arbuthnot was unaware - he was either incompetent or should have very detailed records of denials. Seems vennells is constantly at the core of all the lying about all these issues though.
    • Paywalled/subscribe HB I'm unaware of the details on this HB but why is it a potential taxpayer burden? Hasn't a judge already ruled port has rights of access - so shouldn't costs be on the private company (South Tees Development Corporation) trying to change established access?     LIVE: High Court updates as CEO gives evidence in access rights row between STDC and PD Ports - Teesside Live WWW.GAZETTELIVE.CO.UK The face-off between the Teesport operator and Mayor Ben Houchen's South Tees Development Corporation continues in the High Court  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Creation/SCS lied about cancelling Finance Agreement and wanting money for goods we have not received !


Ruby roo 1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2457 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I want to tell every member of the public what we have been put through by SCS in Stevenage

 

As we where moving to a new home back in 2014 we needed to purchase furniture and carpet

In November 2013 we placed an order for Furniture on finance by a VERY pushy Salesman

The very next day we cancelled the order and Finance Agreement as we did not like their terms and conditions

 

We went into the store but was treated so badly by the Salesman and he refused to find our order making out it was lost

I made someone in the accounts department cross out the order saying cancelled across our part of the order and left

 

In January 2014 we went back to the store to place an order for a carpet and left a deposit on a credit card for half the value

A week before it was due to be fitted I find out that no-one had ordered our carpet so it would not be fitted in time

 

We threatened to cancel the order and needed to look for a replacement which could be fitted in time

 

SCS asked us to go into the store as they promised to get one for us like for like of another style which was more expensive but promised to charge the same price and fit it in time

We agreed and we just needed the correct Invoice re written for the change of style name so we could pay for the balance

 

The carpet Was fitted on time BUT it was fitted by COWBOYS

there was NOT enough carpet ordered to finish the job

I was forced to pay them for the fitting as they rang a woman from the store who told me I had to pay them and she would find the rest of the carpet to finish the job

 

Our home was ruined as every skirting was forced off of the walls,

the stair carpet fell off and

the study was unfinished

, the underlay was incorrect

and all three wardrobes where short by an inch

 

We complained about this and reluctantly after months of strain they paid us a cheque for the damage and fitted the whole house again

This was when the real hit the fan

 

9 months later as we where still awaiting the correct Invoice to be sent to us,

we find out that a Mr ....had NOT cancelled the old Credit Finance and put the WHOLE of the carpet order value + extra costs and a huge amount was Totally incorrect on finance but this finance paperwork still had 'SOFA' on it and NOT carpet

 

We where only informed of this from the finance company 'Creation' who by now where chasing payments !

 

We had to explain to them that we had NEVER wished for this carpet nor any order to be put on Finance as we had cancelled it months ago

Long story short

 

We are now being blackmailed to pay for something we have not had ( 'SOFA' )and no one will help us and SCS have blatantly done this knowing we will get a bad credit rating

 

We have been to the Ombudsman who messed up as a junior dealt with it first and made mistakes and we have spoken to Creation but no one will understand our problem

Is there anyone who can help resolve this

 

 

DO NOT BUY ANYTHING FROM SCS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did I see you initial order involved a credit card?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Well when we ordered carpet weeks after we cancelled the 'SOFA' order and finance yes ! My credit card stepped in and told them not to deliver a sofa etc as they tried to get a delivery firm deliver it but after my credit card stepped in they said again that they would cancel the order !! But they didn't !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1

was thinking section 75

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...