Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've just taken another look through the stuff they sent me in response to the CPR request, the notice of assignment isn't the original , it's on a plain sheet of non letterhead paper, in fact it could have easily been typed up by Overdales, or anybody really.  On the other side of the paper are standard Lowell terms and conditions that are only half on the page. Should this be part of my defence?
    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays unknown debts


lockhart1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2485 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi again

 

This is my second thread in regards to an ongoing problem

 

Unfortunately my mum has been left with debts that she has no idea about from her marriage which has broken down

 

These debts are with PayPlan at the moment who are paying all creditors each month with a lower monthly repayment and 0% interest.

 

This plan was set up between her and my dad when they were together as she could not manage her repayments

 

She has now asked PayPlan to send her a summary of such debts which are in her name.

 

On the summary it states that 4 debts are to Barclays and 1 to LINK.

 

The references suggest that 1 is a loan that we know about (see my other thread).

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?479075-Barclays-Personal-Loan

 

It looks like another is a current account as they said it was in 'joint' names and I know joint loans/credit cards do not exist. The reference is 5082XXXXXXXXX which also suggests it's a current account because the sort code of our area is 20-50-82 so they've missed out the '20'. The only thing that doesn't make sense is the fact it is followed by 9 numbers instead of 8 so we cannot use it as an account number.

 

The other 2 seem to be credit cards that have reference numbers on there.

 

We went into branch today and the member of staff could see the loan that we know about and some closed credit cards which do not match the reference numbers for the outstanding debts.

 

He could not find any other accounts in her name.

 

PayPlan have confirmed that the LINK debt was a Barclaycard so I assume that because the other 4 debts are still displaying 'Barclays' rather than a debt collector the debts are still with Barclays. Am I right in assuming this? Obviously we know that the 1 loan is still with Barclays as they could find it on their systems, but nothing else.

 

So as you can see I've done a bit of digging already and ultimately want to make sense of it all because my mum is clueless as to why there's so much debt in her name on this 'plan'. They claim this is her section of the plan they had between them, as these debts are apparently in her name.

 

I want to identify each debt and also see proof that these are actually hers to pay. As you can imagine this can seem like an impossible task when only 1 can be found on their systems. The LINK debt will have to be dealt with by LINK as far as I know.

 

Any advice to tackle this would be greatly appreciated.

Edited by Andyorch
Link added
Link to post
Share on other sites

Simple - Send a SAR Request if possible to fine out more info - Or ask for a financial statement for each debt,

 

I was thinking this would be the best way. With some potentially being Barclays credit cards this would be considered Barclaycard. I don't suppose you know whether I have to send two SARs, one for Barclays and one for Barclaycard?

 

Under the summary from PayPlan they simply state 'Barclays' and there is no mention of 'Barclaycard' but the references strongly suggest they are credit cards.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

One SAR should be sufficient for both as they are the same firm. Barclays... Dont let them fob you off. Itll give you enough info to be able to proceed for now.

£10 PO and a letter should suffice.

 

Are the Refs 16 digit refs beginning 4 / 5 ? KIf so these usually are Credit Cards

AMex begin 3

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

One SAR should be sufficient for both as they are the same firm. Barclays... Dont let them fob you off. Itll give you enough info to be able to proceed for now.

£10 PO and a letter should suffice.

 

Are the Refs 16 digit refs beginning 4 / 5 ? KIf so these usually are Credit Cards

AMex begin 3

 

They begin with 5 so I think they're Mastercards that they don't offer anymore. They only begin with 4929 as they only use Visa nowadays but these are dated.

 

I'll crack on with an SAR tonight and look at a section 77/78 CCA once I have the relevant information in terms of account details.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LH,

 

If you find that there's more than one case with Barclays and/or BC, please start a new thread for each account or it's difficult to follow.

 

I'm aware of the other thread you just started. :wink:

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...