Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK, thanks, I won't wait for them. On a side note, some of the posts on here are a bit frustrating, I read through five pages or so of someone going through the court process rooting for them as I'm reading, then nothing, not heard of again. Left here wondering what the outcome was, lol!
    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because therte was still £69 owing, so I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle.   However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account 106985089 has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, so I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Shoplifting at Tesco and record handling for employment


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2482 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am embarrassed to say I got caught eating a product at tescos I did not pay for today, which I completely forgot about,

 

 

long story short,

the police didn't get involved

they took the RLP route

 

 

said a letter will come through soon.

 

 

I know most members advise against paying these [problem]mers

but I feel far too embarrassed and would rather just get it over with.

 

My question is,

how will the record they keep affect my future employment with Tesco themselves?

Since I am a pharmacist and Tesco is a very big chain,

would paying the RLP effectively prove that I'm guilty?

 

Thanks in advance to anyone that can help :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget about it totally.

 

 

yes it might well make them raise their eyebrows IF its ever recorded on their systems

only p'haps sidewinder might have an insight.

 

 

however YOU DO NOT PAY RLP ANYTHING IT WILL NOT EXPULGE YOUR DETAILS FROM TESCO.

 

 

interesting you say RLP

Tesco now use DWF...

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will alert your thread to whom might give you an insight.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

As far as I am aware, the security team within Tesco keep the names and addresses of shoplifters for future reference just in case the same person does it again so you may have to explain yourself to Tesco. As I see it, this was an oversight rather than a deliberate attempt to steal and as such, if Tesco ask you about it, be up front and see what happens. No point trying to lie your way out of this.

 

Once the details are passed on to either RLP or DWF ( it may be that there is a transitional period where DWF take on the cases fully from RLP) Tesco have no further involvement and as such, they won't know whether you paid or not. The charges made by either firm can be up to £150 and with RLP, even more. These charges do not represent any cost to the store.

 

Did you pay for what you ate? If not, go back and pay for it. If you did pay, there is absolutely no loss to Tesco. You have to remember that security staff don't get all the training they need to ascertain the difference between deliberate theft and an oversight. They see all losses as theft and deal with them the same way. No grey areas!

 

Nobody can say for sure what will happen with Tesco and your pharmacy role as that would be an internal matter to which we are not privy to. All we can say for sure is that the charge levied has no basis in law and as such should be ignored.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

In general, I suggest not paying RLP.

 

I don't know if RLP feed back to Tesco if someone refuses to pay the speculative invoice from RLP.

If (and only if!) you work for Tesco or plan to do so in the near future then only you can decide how worried you are that not paying RLP might have an effect.

 

It may be that Tesco keep a record of these events anyway, and paying RLP makes no difference.

It may be that not paying RLP doesn't give Tesco any new information.

So it is only if not paying RLP changes the information a Tesco hold on you that you should even consider paying!

 

If you did decide to pay RLP: I'd make it clear that you are doing so only to conclude the civil matter, and make it clear there is no admission of wrongdoing.

 

I recently walked out of a supermarket not having paid for an item... I'd used self-scan, and missed a small aerosol (silver body, tucked in the corner of the trolley!). The rest of my shopping I'd paid for and loaded into carrier bags.

There is a "travellator" down to the car park. With the trolley inclining, the aerosol fell forward : so I noticed it wasn't packed in a carrier / paid for : Oops!.

I must have been an odd sight (holding it in the air with one hand as I went down the travellator and back up again to go to pay for it - to make sure it was obvious I wasn't trying to conceal it).

 

The security guy sat by the exit was complete nonplussed : mistakes happen!. For it to be shoplifting / theft, there has to be dishonest intent.

I suspect this (& the low value of the item!) is why the police weren't called for the circumstances you describe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

As far as I am aware, the security team within Tesco keep the names and addresses of shoplifters for future reference just in case the same person does it again so you may have to explain yourself to Tesco. As I see it, this was an oversight rather than a deliberate attempt to steal and as such, if Tesco ask you about it, be up front and see what happens. No point trying to lie your way out of this.

 

Once the details are passed on to either RLP or DWF ( it may be that there is a transitional period where DWF take on the cases fully from RLP) Tesco have no further involvement and as such, they won't know whether you paid or not. The charges made by either firm can be up to £150 and with RLP, even more. These charges do not represent any cost to the store.

 

Did you pay for what you ate? If not, go back and pay for it. If you did pay, there is absolutely no loss to Tesco. You have to remember that security staff don't get all the training they need to ascertain the difference between deliberate theft and an oversight. They see all losses as theft and deal with them the same way. No grey areas!

 

Nobody can say for sure what will happen with Tesco and your pharmacy role as that would be an internal matter to which we are not privy to. All we can say for sure is that the charge levied has no basis in law and as such should be ignored.

 

I tried asking to pay for it, however the security man refused and said that it was too late. He said the invoice for the food will be included in the DWF. I was just wondering if I can find out any useful information (such as what they hold on me and how long they plan on holding this information), for example through the freedom of information act? I feel that in my case I didn't have the chance to adequately defend myself as I felt far too embarrassed and shocked at the time.

 

I just feel that it's unfair to have my career hindered over a silly matter whereby I couldn't explain or defend myself properly and to be labeled as a 'shoplifter'. As you can imagine in my line of work something like that paints a very bad image of me and show me to be untrustworthy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In general, I suggest not paying RLP.

 

I don't know if RLP feed back to Tesco if someone refuses to pay the speculative invoice from RLP.

If (and only if!) you work for Tesco or plan to do so in the near future then only you can decide how worried you are that not paying RLP might have an effect.

 

It may be that Tesco keep a record of these events anyway, and paying RLP makes no difference.

It may be that not paying RLP doesn't give Tesco any new information.

So it is only if not paying RLP changes the information a Tesco hold on you that you should even consider paying!

 

If you did decide to pay RLP: I'd make it clear that you are doing so only to conclude the civil matter, and make it clear there is no admission of wrongdoing.

 

I recently walked out of a supermarket not having paid for an item... I'd used self-scan, and missed a small aerosol (silver body, tucked in the corner of the trolley!). The rest of my shopping I'd paid for and loaded into carrier bags.

There is a "travellator" down to the car park. With the trolley inclining, the aerosol fell forward : so I noticed it wasn't packed in a carrier / paid for : Oops!.

I must have been an odd sight (holding it in the air with one hand as I went down the travellator and back up again to go to pay for it - to make sure it was obvious I wasn't trying to conceal it).

 

The security guy sat by the exit was complete nonplussed : mistakes happen!. For it to be shoplifting / theft, there has to be dishonest intent.

I suspect this (& the low value of the item!) is why the police weren't called for the circumstances you describe.

 

Thank you for your advice, I was just wondering if I do choose to ignore them, how long can I expect for them to be sending me letter to request the funds? Because I don't want to be spammed by them for years and years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

about 3 letters over 6mts

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was RLP chasing, they tend to send quite a few template letters and then pass it on to a debt collector to chase and debt collectors have even less power that RLP.

 

With DWF, yes they don't spend that much time on chasing. They let things die as they know they would be on a loser continuing to chase.

 

With RLP, I have seen cases where they begin chasing again after a couple of years in the vain hope they will get payment this time.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only just seen this. It isn't clear from your OP whether you actually work for Tesco at present or whether you hope to work for them in the future? If you currently work for them did this happen in your own store or elsewhere - and did the guard know that you work for Tesco?

 

If you currently work for them, then this could be difficult especially if the store is where you work, or close to your own store

 

If you don't work for them at present then this will have little consequence - and the longer until you do apply for work with them the better. As a current employee this would be a clear breach of trust (even if there was no criminal intent), but if you were applying for work in future, there would almost certainly be no record that would be checked that would uncover this incident - although you 'might' be unlucky and come across either the same guard or any attending manager at any store in the area who 'might' possibly recognise you and start to ask questions!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did pm you...

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no you sw

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did pm you...

 

 

dx

 

You did indeed - and that is why I came here!

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...