Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Santander don't like savers much


Jim Davis
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2479 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I advised him to invest the money in property.

Meanwhile he will get some interest on the money sat in his savings account.

.........

Are there any tax liabilities for transferring the money to my son?

I hope not.

 

If you've taken financial advice, you'd know the CGT and income tax ramifications of:

Transferring the money, your son gaining interest on the money in a savings account, as well as the income tax and CGT liability from investing the money in property.

 

If you have transferred the money without taking financial advice: Oops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP, you really should be taking some professional advice to help you with your plans. Lots of questions will be raised. It may cost you for an initial meeting (although a lot will do it for free) but would be worth it in the long run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To my house sale conveyancing solicitor I provided my paper driving licence,

 

You can exchange your paper-only driving licence for the photo card one, free of charge.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/11028839/Driving-licence-changes-what-do-paper-licence-holders-need-to-know.html

 

(You'll have to renew the photo card at least every 10 years though : current cost for renewal £20, though they do the initial exchange free.)

Since you'll need both a counter-signed photo, and to be exempted from the fee for a photocard replacement you'd have to do this by post rather than the online service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP, you really should be taking some professional advice to help you with your plans. Lots of questions will be raised. It may cost you for an initial meeting (although a lot will do it for free) but would be worth it in the long run.

 

OP has been so advised, a number of times.

 

My perception is the OP likes to let situations develop they can then grumble about (financial advice, interest rates on savings, photo ID, interest rates on borrowing), instead of taking action to help themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My money is now in my Son's bank account. Nobody has complained or sent him or me

any kind of tax demand.

 

Why should anyone complain?.

 

The lack of a tax demand doesn't mean he won't be liable to pay the relevant tax, when it becomes due.

 

It isn't HMRC's responsibility to ensure he declares taxable income, it remains his responsibility to do so - even if they don't send him a notification that they want him to submit a tax return, or a 'tax demand'.

 

How much (if anything) he'll owe will be influenced by how much he invests, and how much he saves, and the income he gets from both.

 

For savings, tax depends on his Personal Savings Allowance (which itself depends on if he is a basic, higher, or additional rate tax payer), and how much interest he gets (which is no longer paid with basic rate tax already deducted).

https://www.gov.uk/apply-tax-free-interest-on-savings/how-much-tax-you-pay

 

Investment income is also taxable, and doesn't attract Personal Savings Allowance.

 

Have you told him he may now have to pay more tax?, and submit a tax return? (even if he didn't have to previously.........)

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Bazza so you are implying that I shouldn't invest in property but take advice from some

financial adviser. I think you are talking out of your a**. My first house cost me £7,300 and I sold

my last house for £250,000. Please explain why you think such an investment is so poor.

Edited by Andyorch
edited
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK Bazza so you are implying that I shouldn't invest in property but take advice from some

financial adviser. I think you are talking out of your a**. My first house cost me £7,300 and I sold

my last house for £250,000. Please explain why you think such an investment is so poor.

 

Where have I said you shouldn't invest in property?

 

It MIGHT be ideal for you, (although doing so through your son may have added a layer of complexity.....)

It might not be ideal ..... reasons why it might not be ideal include:

 

Does it fit with your desired outcomes? (are you looking for income? or capital growth of your portfolio?)

Are you looking for quick access to your funds (property can often be difficult to convert to liquid assets without paying a premium to do so)

Are you looking for a long or short term investment? (property is more suited to long-term ... short term, what if there is another 'property price crash'?)

 

Tax : property as a capital growth investment (rather than for a main residence) attracts CGT.

Property (to generate rental income) attracts income tax on rental income.

You have evaded answering about you and your son's new tax obligations....... have you reminded him of the obligations he is taking on?.

 

Moving to why "I think such an investment is poor" (which I never actually said, but lets look at if it is poor or not....)

Your first house cost you £7,300 in year and your new house (aproximately!) £100,000 in 2017.

How much is £7,300 in year when adjusted for the 'time value of money'? as you can't directly compare £7,300 years ago with £100,000 today ......

 

Also, are you comparing a house of the same size with a house of the same size?? You've downsized.

You need to be comparing a house of the same size / location / upkeep as your £100k house, and find the purchase price of that house in year . Factor in payments made on upkeep over the years, too.

 

Then compare that cost with the £7,300 you paid back then, adjust that difference for (the time value of money / inflation / FTSE 100 / cost of Mars bars / whatever you feel is the best way to compare like with like across many years.....) to give a present day sum, and compare that with the £150,000 you were left as proceeds of sale ......

 

That may show THAT HOUSE was 'a good investment' (with the benefit of hindsight), but that doesn't mean property is still a good investment for you, in the future....

 

For example, you didn't have to pay CGT (if it was a main residence). So, you can't imply that doing the same on non-"main residence" is as good a deal, as you need to factor in CGT.

 

You have said "I'm talking out of my a**".If you are being so superficial as to say "£7,300 has become £250,000 so that must be a good investment", without looking at the effects of inflation, how other investments have performed, and the effects of you downsizing, then I doubt that is an assessment you can reliably make, even before considering CGT on investment property, income tax on rental income, and if property is a good fit for

 

a) your desired level of risk and

b) your desired level of access to the money invested

 

Ohh, and I'm not a financial adviser (independent or 'tied'), Yes, an IFA might cost you a little, but not involving an IFA may end up costing you a lot .....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...