Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So why are they not respecting the quite clear current voter desires and just s*d off?
    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hoist/Cohen claimform - Barclaycard***Claim Struck Out***


1972mum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2366 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've been reading through the forums for a while but just am getting a bit nervy now!

 

Im at the stage where after submitting the defence, ive got the Defence questionnaire re the small claims track.

 

Hoist still haven't responded to my requests for info, and ive not had anything back from Cohens either and the requests were sent at the end of April.

 

Before it got to this stage, Id spoken to the litigation department twice requesting correspondence - in the second call, the Hoist person said that they wouldn't be sending me any requested info...

 

Am i correct in thinking that i now tick the mediation box and take it from there?

 

I then explain about the requested information not being provided - assuming it still hasn't by then?

 

Sorry if this has been said loads before, but i just need to know for my own peace of mind!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pleaseo tell us more about the debt as has been asked above.

 

In terms of mediation, you should read around this forum and see what we have to say about mediation.

 

Mediation is generally unsuited to these debt matters and even the mediation service says so on their webpage

 

Solicitors and other organisations when dealing with litigants in person are generally not qualified to enter into any mediation process and the approach seems to be that it is an opportunity to get the litigant in person to give up some of their rights. This is not at all the purpose of mediation.

 

I'm very interested to hear that hoist are apparently refusing to give you any further information. In addition to the case in detail requested above, please can you tell us what you have asked for and what it is they are refusing to give you.

 

I'm also concerned that you are dealing with them on the telephone but I'm quite sure that you are not recording any calls so you have nothing set down in evidence to show any lack of cooperation or reasonable behaviour to you. You should read our customer services guide and implement the advice there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BankFodder, I'm not dealing with them by telephone. That was before I'd got all the court stuff through.

I am at work at the moment so will update further later.

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the claimform was in april

have you checked with the court that they've paid the fee to unstay the claim?

as I expect it got well stayed if they didn't respond within 28days of your defence filing date?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the claimform was in april

have you checked with the court that they've paid the fee to unstay the claim?

as I expect it got well stayed if they didn't respond within 28days of your defence filing date?

 

They must have if the court has sent the N180 ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm just being fanciful, but I'm playing around with an idea that if a claimant acts unreasonably and for instance fails to respond to a CPR 31 request, whether they aren't then treating the defendant unfairly which might give a basis for a counterclaim based on COBS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claimant is not compelled to comply to a CPR request as its only a civil request.....disclosure of documents will only happen after a defence has been submitted and only at the appropriate stage...after allocation of the claim.

 

As for a CCA section...they will remain in default and unable to enforce the agreement until such time they can comply

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well… I'll just keep on dreaming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh well… I'll just keep on dreaming.

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant - HOIST

 

Date of issue – 20 APRIL 17

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.this is for the sum of £8004 in respect of monies owing under an agreement with the account no.....pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974(cca)

the debt was legally assigned by mkdp llp (ex barclaycard) to the claimant and notice has been served.

2.the defendant has failed to make contractual payments under the terms of the agreement. a default notice has been served upon the defendant pursuant to s.87(1)cca.

What is the value of the claim? £8514.85

 

Is the claim for - CREDIT CARD

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? WAY BEFORE!

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DEBT PURCHASER

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? NO

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? MAY HAVE DONE MANY YEARS AGO

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? NO

 

Why did you cease payments? HUSBANDS BUSINESS FAILED - COULDNT AFFORD AS OTHER DEBTS TOO

 

What was the date of your last payment? NOT SURE I NEED TO CHECK

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? NO

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? DEBT ADVICE SERVICE CONTACTED BARCLAYCARD IN APPROX 2013 -

 

my husband contacted robinson way litigation dept on 26 april,

who told him that no copy correspondence would be sent to me even though i was requesting it.

 

submitted n9 acknowledgment of service - 27th april 17

 

cpr 31.14 to cohens sent 27 april 17 - nothing received as at todays date

 

cca request sent to hoist along with postal order 27 april 17 - nothing received as at todays date

 

received a letter from robinson way 8th may stating

"we write to confirm that we have noted the dispute/query you have raised.

we will make the necessary enquiries and let you know the outcome in due course.

in the meantime we will stop all collection activity on this account"

 

defence was filed 17 may 17, using the standard defence off here.

 

acknowledgement of defence was received dated 17 may 17.

 

ni49a - notice of proposed allocation to the small claims track dated 20 june

- have to reply by 7th july.

states now a defended claim etc.

 

so, back to my original question,

what do i do now!

do i say i want the case referring to the small claims mediation service?

 

(Just realised all in caps sorry! long day and doing this at gone midnight!)

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

N180...

 

you say yes to mediation unless you filed an SB defence

then theres nowt to mediate over.

1 wit you

the rest is onv

 

copy to court

copy to claimant sols

you can omit sig/phone/email

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no legal requirement to give the solicitors you sig/phonee or email details

simply gives them an easy route to pester you .

the court copy should be unredacted mind.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do i fill the other sections in too? ie C and D?

 

You complete all of it

 

https://www.moneyclaimsuk.co.uk/PDFForms/N180.pdf

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I've got my mediation call tomorrow and worried as to what I say! Do I go on the lines of "how can I agree to pay anything when I don't have the details of what it is? (I've never received any of the paperwork requested from hoist or cohens) Sleepless night tonight for me!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then simply state you have received nothing from the claimant.......mediation will end..you get a good night sleep :-)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My mediation call was 10am.

 

Really nice guy phoned me, then phoned Cohens.

 

When he phoned back, he said they have sent you all the relevant paperwork over by email in the last 30 mins....

(email must have been on file from a long time ago).

 

They sent the info at 9am - i requested it 27 April.

 

The mediator told me he'd call me back in the morning when I'd had chance to look at the email.

 

They have sent me a blank agreement - nothing on it at all.

No name, dates etc.

 

They also sent a copy of assignment from Barclaycard to mkdr and another to Hoist.

 

Do I have a leg to stand on?

 

The agreement was taken out in 1995 apparently if that's of any relevance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My understanding is that they would need the original agreement to be able to enforce this as its pre 2007 - Can you post minus personal details what they have sent you?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no dice on a blank application form I bet

will need to be a copy of the signed agreement

all the relevant T&C's

and the default notice from the OC.

 

 

I bet this is a copy of the blank 620000 crap they all turf out from their filing cabinets

its even on here in many Barclaycard claimform threads

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is not your agreement. It has to have your details on it to be valid in regard to the current claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

utter bogroll

 

 

you tell mediation you have not received all the required paperwork to enable you to proceed with mediation

but not THE SPECIFICS.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...