Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because therte was still £69 owing, so I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle.   However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account 106985089 has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, so I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
    • they have 6mts else it dies. ................. BUT yet again today you've posted on someone else's thread posts now moved here. please keep to your OWN THREAD!! now to date you've not bothered to reply to our questions so we CAN help you.    
    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2491 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

I know of an employer who is not paying minimum wage. They employ at least two people I know of personally who are both EU migrants. This employer is in the hospitality industry and pays £7 per hour cash in hand, no contract, no wage slips, and I assume no rights.

 

One of the people employed there already has two legit part time jobs so this cash in hand one takes them over the tax limit which they obviously don't pay as it is not on record. The other employee has no other job so this is their only income. They only work part time evenings, or on a when needed basis. Neither of them currently claim any benefits.

 

I am wondering what the general consensus is on this type of activity? Would you report the company or just mind your own business?

I don't like the idea of possibly taking income away people. Also their English is pretty poor so I don't think they really understand the legal situation, I don't know if those employed there even know it is wrong.

 

On the other hand I think employers exploiting people who don't have many options or don't know their rights is not fair either.

 

Just wondering what peoples opinions are.

Thanks

Edited by Dandeilion Clock
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's right. There will be no national insurance being paid by anybody. That means that in addition to receiving less than the minimum wage, they have no protection in the case of illness, they have no holidays. If there are any women involved who become pregnant, they have no maternity leave. Very importantly, if anybody has an industrial accident then they are on their own because there will be no insurance at all to cover them.

 

I understand your point very much about the fact that at least these people are getting some kind of payment – but on the other hand there are many other factors at stake. Also this means that the employer is able to undercut competitors who act morally and lawfully so that people who are honest and hard-working don't have the same fair opportunities as the employer you are talking about.

 

I'm afraid that I would go ahead and report them. There is much more at stake here then simply the jobs of one or two people.

 

You may as well ask the same question about jurisdictions in which a blind eye is turned to very young children working in factories or in mines in extremely poor and dangerous conditions and at a fraction of the going rate for an adult. The same moral imperatives exist – although maybe to a different degree – but if you prevent the children working, does this mean that their families go hungry? There must be a danger of that but on the other hand who compensates the children if they are maimed at work. Who compensates them in adult life because they have been deprived of education and the opportunity to go on to have a better life for themselves and their own families?

 

I think it will be very misguided not to report the employer

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is not a victimless crime, everyone else who works in the same industry suffers as a result of this, wages will remain depressed, the tax take means less money for govt to spend on things, no protection for the employee should they have an accident etc.

As for the employees suffering froma lack of coomand of the english language- this is an imperative for them to learn to communicate and if not in english at least with others who are in a better position to offer help in ther own language.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would entirely agree. To be objective, whilst I doubt it, it is possible that the law isn't being broken. But that isn't your problem. If it's all above board, then that's nothing to do with you and fine. But for self employed people, for example, the living wage doesn't apply. But that is for others to worry about. They all, whoever they are, have responsibilities, and they must sort those out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your input. I can only assume this is so that the employer does not have to pay for holiday or sick pay etc and at the same time have people available to work part time casually when it suits. Also as you point out, no tax or national insurance and all off the books and cash in hand. Otherwise if they wanted casual workers they could employ people on a zero hours contract.

 

I am going to see what else I can find out this week, I am meeting one of these friends to help them sort out their utility bill debts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm quite apathetic in this area now

 

It is unjust and deflates the industry for all the other low (insert several profanities here) paid workers out there, but we all want to pay as little as possible, even us employee loving stalwarts

 

It can also be a pyrrhic victory as the employer just cuts more staff to balance the bills and people lose work

 

For me if i was certain there would be no loss to the people i was trying to help i would report them (No idea if the taxman/NMW bods cares about anon reports though)

 

If there was i chance i'd hurt the people i was trying to help i would zip it

 

Also if your employer gets wind of your aims or concerns there will be a huge target aimed at you and the people you are helping will vanish

 

Be careful

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...