Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Asset Collections claimform - old Lending Stream PDL


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2192 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. i have read through quite a few similar threads (Including one very similar and very recent), but will submit my own anyway.

 

Name of the Claimant ? Asset Collections

 

Date of issue – 01 jun

 

Date to acknowledge) = 19jun

 

 

date to submit defence = 03JUL

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.Asset Collections & Investigation claim this amount in respect of an unpaid loan funded by The Lending Stream. The defendant failed to abide by the terms of the contract. Asset Collections & Investigation purchased this debt from The Lending Stream and subsequently sent a notice of assignment to the defendant to advise.

2.The defendant has failed to respond from the Claimant thus denying the claimant any opportunity in assisting the Defendant in attempting to bring the matter to an amicable Conclusion

3.I will provide the defendant with seperate detailed particulars within 14 days after service of the claim form.

4.The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of %8 a year from xx/08/2016 to xx/05/2017 on £1700 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £0.40

 

What is the value of the claim? £1880

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Payday Loan

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not to my knowledge

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not to my knowledge

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? Not to my knowledge

 

Why did you cease payments? Payday Trap, buried Head in the sand

 

What was the date of your last payment? Jan14

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management planicon? No

 

Timing on this is incredibly bad, i was away and was only able to open the claim letter on the 14th (At which point i acknowledged it)

 

Not yet sent CCA or CPR - will be on that tomorrow morning recorded (To Claimant as no solicitor).

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

claimant is not myself!! amended.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Thanks for the welcome.

 

It appears to be for 2 lumped together. Nov13 - £300, Jan14 £240.

At the time, i had a number of other payday loans, which these helped clear and the cycle continued.

I made a payment on #1, but defaulted on both shortly after the 2nd.

 

Time is running out on my CCA request, i assume i should be getting these off straight away!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

get a CCA Request running to the claimant

leave the £1PO blank and uncrossed

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

don't sign anything

.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi.

 

My CCA and CPR request went out, to date - i have heard nothing back.

 

I assume this would have come through to me paper based via post?

- disappointing given that the particulars specified they will send them through to me within 14 days of the claim being submitted?

(I no longer have access to the web-portal as i did it away from my own computer and stupid me left the gateway ID that i recorded!)

 

Either way, i need to start thinking about prepping a defence to file for the 3rd July.

 

I will look at some similar defences filed - should i also be mentioning that this was for 2 loans bundled but no mention in the particulars of the claim?

 

 

I saw on another thread somewhere that this was not allowed also.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ring northants and get the portal reset for you then?

 

 

if you think about it

you don't want them to respond to CCA/CPR....

 

 

they don't say anything about merged loans in their poc

so neither do you at this stage.

and not, it matters not if the claim is for merged or 2 debts, but they must state such in the poc or WS.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ring northants and get the portal reset for you then?

 

First thing i did, apparently nothing can be done to transfer it to new gateway ID - but he said i would be able to email the defence across - and that past that point it was all postal from there anyway.

 

 

if you think about it

you don't want them to respond to CCA/CPR....

 

Good point well made!

 

 

they don't say anything about merged loans in their poc

so neither do you at this stage.

and not, it matters not if the claim is for merged or 2 debts, but they must state such in the poc or WS.

 

Good to know. i think i need to read up about what to expect past the defence submission.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi.

 

I received an N180 form, which i understand from reading other threads that i should be asking for Mediation. Question is the form has my personal number on it which i don't really want the claimants to have, do i have to serve a copy of this on the Claimant?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you must serve a copy....use a blank N180 for the claimants solicitor

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?406099-LEGAL-N180-Directions-Questionnaire-(Small-Claims-Track)-**Correct-at-Sept-2016**

 

A copy of your defence would also be useful if you require further advice once its allocated.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars of the Claim

 

1.Asset Collections & Investigations claim this amount in respect of an unpaid loan funded by The Lending Stream. The defendant failed to abide by the terms of the contract.

 

2.Asset Collections & Investigations purchased this debt from The Lending Stream and subsequently sent a notice of assignment to the defendant to advise.

 

3.The defendant has failed to respond from the Claimant thus denying the claimant any opportunity in assisting the defendant in attempting to bring the matter to an amicable conclusion.

 

4.I will provide the defendant with seperate detailed particulars within 14 days after service of the claim form.

 

5.The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at he rate of 8% a year from xx/0x/2016 to xx/0x/2017 on £x,xxx.xx and also the interest at the same rate up to the date of the judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of £x.xx

 

 

 

Defence

 

The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5(3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

 

1. Paragraph 1 of the particulars is not admitted with regards to the Defendant entering into an Agreement referred to in the Particulars of Claim for an amount of £xxxx.xx. It is denied the defendant failed to abide by the terms of contract.

 

 

2. It is denied the claimant has served any Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law & Property Act 1925.

 

 

3. Paragraph 3 is denied the Claimant has not made any contact or followed any Pre-Action Protocol in an attempt to resolve this matter and is put to strict proof thereof.

 

 

4. The Claimant’s statement of case fails to give adequate information to enable the Defendant to properly assess her position with regards the claim.

 

 

5. On the 21st June 2017 the Defendant sent a request for inspection of documents under Civil Procedure Rule 31.14. It was requested that the Claimant provide copies of the following: 1. Agreement / Contract 2. Default Notice 3. Assignment 4. Formal Demand

 

 

6. The claim is disputed with regards to the Defendant owing monies stated to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for;

© show how any breach occurred and a valid Default Notice was issued,

(d) show how it has legal assignment of any alleged debt.

 

 

7. On the 21st June 2017 the Defendant sent a formal request for a copy of the original agreement to the Claimant pursuant to section 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee.

 

 

8. The Claimant has failed to comply with s78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and by virtue of s78(6) Consumer Credit Act 1974 cannot enforce the agreement.

 

 

9. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

 

10. In the event that the relevant documents are received from the Claimants, the Defendant will then be in a position to amend the defence, and would ask that the Claimants bear the costs of the amendment.

 

 

11. It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief as claimed or at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the following happen ?

 

4.I will provide the defendant with separate detailed particulars within 14 days after service of the claim form.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you can raise it within your witness statement which follows after allocation (N180).

 

I personally think its an error and a sign of the inexperienced who wrote the particulars...as there is enough detail in the particulars provided without the need of further separate particulars....but you can wind them up:wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have had an offer of Mediation from the courts now.

 

I have read through the mediation guide in the sticky - however still unsure about the below (As ALL 3 questions need to be a "YES"):

 

I can confirm that I have enough information about the claim to allow me to enter into negotiations and that I do not require any further evidence from the other party before the appointment.

 

But i don't think i have had all of the info from them given i have not had a response to the CPA/CPR nor the extra details to be issued within 14 days as mentioned in the particulars. Can i (Or should i) still answer yes to this so that mediation will go through?

 

TIA

Link to post
Share on other sites

You keep to yes until the mediation phonecalls

THEN you say no when asked the paperwork question

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

actually checking the dates it wont be registered yet 28 days has not expired.

 

and you say you part admitted? not AOS defend all?

so guaranteed its gonna be.

hope you didnt use the N9A?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

I received a letter from the courts a few days ago advising that the case is being allocated to a local court, and to await a date.

 

I also received several emails today direct from asset collections.

 

 

The first advising me that a court claim has been submitted against me and not to ignore it - i was extremly tempted to send a sarcarstic reply.

 

The 2nd was filled with lots of PDF attachments,

including agreements,

statements

and default notices

(1 for each loan - 6 attachments in total).

 

Game over?

Link to post
Share on other sites

redact them all to ONE PDF and upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just looking through some other threads at the moment.

 

Specifically the one linked below that mentions reference numbers.

 

 

Im still unclear, does this give me an edge, as a similar situation applies

- i have been back through the particulars, and no reference numbers are mentioned apart from a reference under "Claimant incuding reference" - which is a different reference.

 

 

It does also mention sending me particulars of claim within 14 days (as mentioned before, nothing has been received until now)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?478434-Asset-Collections-claimform-Multiple-Lending-Stream-PDls-in-one-claim&p=5060566&viewfull=1#post5060566

Link to post
Share on other sites

See 3.2 here.....Practice Direction 16 Statements of Case

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part16/pd_part16#8.1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to 3.8 - as below - which has not been followed either - however, how much in practice could this be relied upon to affect the outcome of the case?

3.8 Particulars of claim served separately from the claim form must also contain:

(1) the name of the court in which the claim is proceeding,

(2) the claim number,

(3) the title of the proceedings, and

(4) the claimant’s address for service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...