Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Moorcroft for Arrows - chasing OH's M+S card debt


marco23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1629 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all

i am writting this on behalf of my wife,

 

she had a large debt with marks & spencer credit card just over £9000,

she defaulted on payments and the debt was sold on to Moorcroft who aranged a repayment plan with her of £5 per month,

 

all has been well for two years and now they want her to complete an expenditure form,

 

i emailed them back saying they have no legal right to demand this and will not submit the inforation requested.

 

the online payment facility keeps taking her to the expenditure form page and wont take the payment, their is no CCJ on the account,where does she go from here ?

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore moorcroft. Theyre total bottom feeders. Also, are you sure they bought it? They normally just chase on behalf of a creditor.

 

If they bought it, i would seriously question you blindly paying them without checking the validity of the debt.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

then dont pay online. Arrange a standing order for the fiver and do a CCA request tio see if they have the paperwork to enforce the debt. If thet dont you cancel the standing order. Refusal to accept the payment can invalidate the debt given enough time so take screen shots of the web pages to use against them and keep hard copies of all emails.

DONT use the phone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Moorcroft don't buy debts - who told you they'd purchased it???

 

 

look on their letters

who is stated as their client please...

when was the card taken out too?

 

 

please don't forget the golden rule

that applies to all her debts

a DCA IS NOT A BAILIFF

and has

NO LEGAL POWERS WHATSOEVER

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks for the replies guys,

they must be collecting it on behalf of M&S,

 

the account was opened around 2007,

trouble is the default is within 12 months of dropping of her credit file so she obviously doesn't want a CCJ at this stage,

 

probably better to send the letter asking to see the loan agreement ?

but i would have thought M&S credit card services would have this on file anyway or am i missing something here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fact that the default is almost 6yrs doesn't mean anything.

 

 

a CCJ can still be attained after that and will still show.

who is their client please???

 

 

the original creditor would never do court

so stop being scared of that.

 

 

and if its it IS still owned by M+S

little point in a CCA request to them either

 

 

just ignore Moorcroft.

I would guess she stupidly started paying Moorcroft because at that time you'd not found CAG?

go pay M+S directly

 

 

cut out the DCA.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

hi all im having a bit of trouble if anyone can point me in the right direction

 

I have been paying Moorcroft Debt Recovery £5 per month for around 4 years on a 8k debt which was on a M&S credit card,

 

they are now insisting i complete a financial assessment form ,

i take it they are trying to up the payments,

 

i have never sent them a prove it letter and their is no CCJ on the account,

 

they say the agreement i have is informal and may not stop county court action,

 

what direction should i take,

,many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to moorcroft & M+S card debt

old and new threads merged 

 

now please re read and answer the outstanding questions?

like are moorcrofts client M+S?

why did you keep paying Moorcroft when you were advised before to doing stop that?

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

it was easier at the time to pay moorcroft as the payments were low and affordable,

the wife had had a nervous breakdown so i took over the repayment arrangements to take the pressure from her,

the debt was in effect sleeping while not making her ill,,

i hope you can understand

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks old Cogger,

i'm thinking now to stop the payment to moorcroft and put the debt into dispute by sending them a prove it letter

 

however i think the chances are slim that M&S don't have the documentation,,

somewhere in the cog of collection either M&S want the payments increased or Moorcroft do,

probably Moorcroft i suspect

but passing the buck to M&S by saying if i don't comply 'its an informal agreement that can be concluded with a CCJ'

Link to post
Share on other sites

??

forget stupid prove it letters.

 

follow post 8

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

may i ask why not?

or is it they just sell on for someone else to do the dirty work

 

its debt to M&S credit card services, other than that only Moorcroft have been involved in the collection

Link to post
Share on other sites

so still owned by the OC

they wont do court because of potential bad publicity.

so pay then directly via your banks interweb portal.

ignore and do not pay or anything at all Moorcroft.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i wont be sending anymore payments to Moorcroft and shall contact the OC to pay direct.

 

i'm quite happy to make the monthly payments but was concerned as the debt is around 9K they may go for a CCJ then a charge on property, even those i could live with but 'i dont know' do they add interest on a property charge if so then that's when it gets scary, is it still not worth doing the CCA letter?

 

the account was opened around 2007

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

as I've said there is little evidence of Original Creditors issuing any court proceedings.

there is NO evidence here that M+S do.

 

I didnt say contact the OC, just do it monthly by say BACS or automatically by setting up standing order via your banks interweb portal.

unless this was a store card upgraded to a credit card, there is little or no point in a CCA request to M+S the OC.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, marco23 said:

 

 

they are now insisting i complete a financial assessment form ,

 

 

Only  a court, HMRC or Council Tax Collections have the right to insist on a financial assessment form.   

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, London1971 said:

 

Only  a court, HMRC or Council Tax Collections have the right to insist on a financial assessment form.   

yeh their not getting that London, their not even getting a response, DX has given some valuable points and i thank you all

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahhhh, i just checked the letter from Moorcroft and its headed Re: Arrow Global LTD (sorry i missed that) so at some point it must have left the hands of M&S, does this change things now??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send Arrow a CCA request

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Andyorch said:

Send Arrow a CCA request

 

thank you,, i have no reference numbers or account number to include on the letter so should i use the moorcroft client ref number and moorcroft reference (two dif numbers) and make PO payable to Arrow Global ltd

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Andyorch said:

Yes

OK the CCA request has gone off in the post,

 

now if Arrow Global cant produce this then that chucks up an alternative route to the problem,

 

should they be able to enforce the debt 'with the CCA' then what route is best to keep it out of the County Court,

 

i can only see an increase in payments would do the trick,

 

my main objective is not to let it go to CC or worse even a charging order because this will make the wife ill again, 

 

so an increase in the monthly payment or an offer of full and final payment at say 50% of the debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...