Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Very.co.uk nightmare - new bed was broken upon delivery


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2492 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I'm hoping for some advice on how to proceed further with Very.co.uk.

 

 

I received a broken bed for my three year old son on 22 May

(after delivery was delayed a week due to the bed getting lost in the warehouse).

Half the parts that hold the slats to the bed were broken and unusable.

 

 

I immediately rang them

- they took the details and said their parts team would send out replacements.

I also sent a message via my account at the same time.

 

 

Having heard nothing I rang them again on Thursday 25 May and was told that the parts had been sent out and would take 7-10 days.

 

 

I was about to query the length of time but I was abruptly hung up on

(a common occurrence when you call Verys customer service).

 

 

The following day I received another message asking which parts were broken

- contradicting the man who had told me they were on their way the evening before.

 

 

I then called them again on 30 May to be told that they had just ordered the parts the night before. Having been told this before and it turning out to not be the case I asked them to return the damaged bed.

 

 

They refused telling me I had to wait for the parts to arrive and asked me to wait another 7-10 days (which would take us to three weeks since the bed arrived broken).

 

 

I messaged them again via my account reiterating my request for a refund and also emailed a complaint via Very.co.uk to which I have had no response.

 

 

The customer service has been appalling.

My poor son has been without a proper bed for two weeks now and there is no resolution in sight.

I am completely appalled given threat the goods were damaged they should be providing a refund.

 

 

I have never dealt with such an awful company so I am at a loss what to do

- other than seek advice from the ombudsman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as this was online

you are covered by CRA. [old SOGA/Distance selling regulations]

 

 

you can cancel for no reason up until 14 days from delivery date

and if faulty up until 30day

under CRA you are entitled to a full refund.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

However, you should learn from this and not shop with Very again. We have a huge number of complaints about them on this forum – in particular the quality of what they sell and the quality of their customer service which you are finding out for yourself is not at all good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that if they steadfastly refuse, then the only solution is to begin a small claim in the County Court. If you started a claim like this, I'm sure they would immediately take notice and sort themselves out. However, it's such a shame that they push their customers to even thinking about this kind of action.

 

I'm afraid that there is no ombudsman for this kind of thing. You should certainly reported to trading standards – but that won't produce any immediate solution and in fact it will simply be added to their collection of complaints which they probably have about this company.

 

Where a company like Very really wants to deny their customers a decent service and a decent product, it becomes a bit difficult to do anything and certainly to get any rapid results.

 

If you have the money then I think a quick fix is to get another bed from somewhere else, and to store the one that you have got from Very and then start making trouble about it – including compensation and also a storage fee. We would be very happy to help you.

 

I sent a tweet directly to them and there has still been no response.

 

If you have a Twitter account then find out tweet and then retweet it. The other thing which may make them sit up is a lot of bad publicity – but really, court papers are the only thing which will move them. Then you will be amazed at the amount of energy and expense they will go to to try and deal with it – when they could have handled it so easily the moment that it went wrong

Link to post
Share on other sites

All part of the Shop direct empire - Shop Direct / Littlewoods / Very Blah Blah Blah...

 

BF is right, a county court claim might be the right option here. But also if you are looking for a swift resolution - Try complaining to the MD of the group. Then go for county court action if it doesnt work out!

 

Plenty of options to make them pay for your misery that they caused you. You can get his email from CEO Email.

But just be prepared - Write everything down - everything in writing - Photos... Get all your evidence together,.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Also had massive problems with a bed from Very that only lasted a few months. My case is already at the pre court stage. Very don't seem to recognise the Consumer Rights Act and just fob people off. Just had a conversation this morning with them to try and avert a small claim and the adviser repeatedly advised me I had to refer the matter to the financial Ombudsman. Im at a loss as to what a faulty bed has to do with the financial ombudsman if the item has already been paid for. Am going to be starting a claim today with them. Good luck with resolving your issue with them and as Bankfoddder says, seems the best way to go with Very is through the small claims court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...