Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/Mortimer old TFC Car Finance - old returns of goods order that was ignored.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2382 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, i'll try and sum my issue up quickly.

 

Sept 2007 got hp with funding corporation for a vehicle for 4 years and stopped paying after 18 ish months.

 

Stupidly made a payment in November 2011.

 

Defaults were served and agreement cancelled by OC in 2009

 

Cabot sent letters for about 12 months that I did not reply to.

 

Mortimer clark made contact with me threatening legal action at the end of January this year.

 

Made SAR at the beginning feb this year to funding corp - THIS WAS FULFILLED AND i RECEIVED THE SAR

 

Made CCA request to cabot - THIS HAS NOT YET BEEN FULFILLED AND IT'S NOW MAY.

 

NOW

 

called today both Cabot and Mortimer Clarke. (this is the issue along with my big mouth)

to tell them my new address.

 

asked Mortimer Clarke the status of the account (it's on hold),

asked them that they I expect a responce to the CCA request and let slip that I already had the original T&C's from the OC (I really did not want to say that)

 

called back to see if they had actioned the cca request and they said It's gone through (not quite sure what that meant)

 

If they do Correctly action the CCA request then I may have an upper hand.

 

The OC and Lowell took me to court and the outcome was that I return the vehicle there was no judgement for money owed.

 

I did not return the vehicle.

 

I wonder if it can still be taken to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi ashley01283 and Welcome to CAG

 

I have moved your thread to the correct forum...Financial Legal Issues Forum are for court claims already issued.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

god please never ever ring a fleecing DCA or their fake/tame solictors

neithr are bailiffs

and neither have any such legal powers.

 

now, back to when they took you to court

it couldn't have been the OC & Lowells

it was one or the other

and was it a return of goods order

and when was this

 

your story is somewhat confusing. and at odds

with what we know should happen

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure it was the OC that had taken me to court.

 

They did this after I moved house so I had no idea they had done it until this year when I received the SAR from the OC therefore could not defend (even though I don't think I had any defense to begin with).

 

The court date was 26/3/2010 and yes it was to return the vehicle.

 

Sorry about how I put my story,

I was trying to state facts without making it too long and doing it really quickly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good so court case was nowt to do with any DCA

and was a return of goods order.

 

right stupidly you've paid so it cant be statute barred

but

until/unless they comply to your CCA request

they are powerless to enforce.

please STAY OFF THE PHONE TO ANY DCA FOR ANY DEBT INC THIS ONE.

 

if you here anything more scan it up

if they do ring

writing only put the phone down.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully, if they do respond to the CCA request, I wonder what delay tactics can be used for 6 months as it would be statue barred in november.

 

I'll get straight back if I get anything, Mortimer Clarke say it's usually rare to have the information for anything older than 6 years so here's hoping.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you didnt return the Car ashley ?

 

We seem to have confusion with the thread title

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys, i'll try and sum my issue up quickly.

 

 

 

The OC and Lowell took me to court and the outcome was that I return the vehicle there was no judgement for money owed.

 

I did not return the vehicle.

 

I wonder if it can still be taken to court?

 

:???:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So where is the agreement ?

 

Did you make a random payment of £5 on the 25th Nov 2011 ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

2007 Agreement attached.

 

I think I did make the random £5 payment after they managed to find me after I moved house and never told them where I moved.

 

I must have been a bit unsettled about it and made a payment,

 

However I have no statements from that long ago but it would be something I would have done at the time not knowing any better.

agreement.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

we need to see the T&C's.

agreement is not enforceable if they don't hold them

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original agreement that i posted previously is all i got from them regarding the agreement.

I will check when i get home from work the other side to make sure there is nothing on there.

I will also check the pile from my SAR to see if it possible they could hold them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

doesn't matter what YOU might have

its what the fleecing DCA send.

if they've not sent the T&C's tough luck

for now ignore them.

 

you must always remember.

 

a DCA is NOT A BAILIFF

they have

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS

 

your biggest mistake here was ringing them!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Yes

Just keep up!loading the silly waving

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hello again,

have had a court claim form arrive

before I go into details I would like to thank everyone for the help I have received so far

 

have made a small reoccurring donation.

 

have attached a PDF of the claim form and would like advice before I make my defence.

 

still have not received the correct T&C's for the CCA request.

 

I can't get out of my head that a comparable case has already been in a court and cannot be re-litigated ?

 

The Funding Corporation brought a claim for

(1) the return of the car or the cash value as an alternative and

(2) the balance remaining under the agreement which was £4,994.23.

 

The Judge appeared to have given judgement on the return of the car only,

there was no order as to the repayment of the outstanding balance.

 

As the cause of action for the outstanding balance was raised in the 2010 proceedings,

and the Funding Corporation succeeded in the order for the car but not the outstanding balance and was I believe unchallenged.

 

On that basis, the right to claim the outstanding balance is extinguished and arguably,

Cabot could not bring a fresh claim to recover the outstanding balance where it has been claimed in earlier proceedings.

 

Or am I totally barking up the wrong tree?

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Cabot Financial (UK) Limited

 

Date of issue – 1/9/17

 

Date to acknowledge 19/9/17

 

date to file defence = 3/10/17

 

What is the claim for –

1. The claim is for the balance of instalments due & unpaid under an agreement dated 14/9/07 & under which THE FUNDING CORPORATION LIMITED agreed to provide credit in relation to the purchase of goods payable by instalments ('the Agreement') was assigned to the claimant.

 

PARTICULARS 1. Amount due and unpaid 3794.00

The claimant therefor claims

1. Amount due and unpaid 3794.00

 

What is the value of the claim? 3794.23

 

Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Car hp Agreement

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? After (sept 2007)

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Yes

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? yes

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? yes but not every year (maybe due to moving 4 times in the last 10 years and not keeping my address updated).

 

Why did you cease payments? Lost employment

 

What was the date of your last payment? 25/11/11

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? no

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan Yes but I did not continue with payments and was subsequently taken to court and judgement was for the return of the goods and was unchallenged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

last payment 25/11/11 so cant be statute barred

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...