Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/? claimform - old cap1 card debt - poss SBd***Claim Discontinued***


wakeyshakey
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2371 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would suggest inserting something along the following lines after 3.

 

3. On or around the xxth May 2017, I received a claim form from the County Court Business Centre, Northampton, for a credit card amount of £1XXXXX..Given that I could not recall the precise details of the alleged agreement or if there were any outstanding balances given the passage of time and lack of any communication from the original creditor or the claimant Assignee I initially submitted a statute barred defence as my defence dated xxxxxxx.It has since transpired after speaking to the original creditor that it was not statute barred and therefore request the courts permission that the evidence presented in this witness statement supersedes my initial defence.

 

As stated it could be that they fail to serve or you may end up redrafting the whole statement at the last moment.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claimant has your defence and relevant legal requests re agreement etc. They are likely to address all of that in their wit statement/disclosure, and anything else relevant.

so, you mentioning them in yours should be ok.

don't get stressed, have a good weekend :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good evening all. I hope you've all had a good weekend.

 

I have still not heard anything thus far.

Can you please cast your eyes on the WS so far..

Also wanted to ask if I should put it in the post tomorrow and send next day delivery in case there are issues with royalmail.. or leave it til 10th and send next day delivery,. .what do you think? 11th is when it should arrive.

 

Thanks in advance

 

...........................

 

IN THE --------------- county court

Claim No. -------------

 

BETWEEN:

Claimant

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

AND

Defendant

----------------

 

_________________________ ________

 

WITNESS STATEMENT OF -----------------

_________________________ ________

 

 

 

I ----------------, being the Defendant in this case will state as follows;

 

I make this Witness Statement in support of my defence to the claim. Save insofar of any admittance it is accepted that a contractual relationship did once exist between myself and Capital One. On receipt of this claim I could not recall the precise details of the agreement or any debt and sought clarity by way of a section 78 request and CPR 31.14 both of which the claimant has failed to comply with.

 

1.The claimant is an Assignee, a buyer of defunct disputed or bad debts, which are bought on mass portfolios at a much reduced cost to the amount claimed ...10p to 15p in the £1 and which the original creditors have already wrote off as a capital loss and claimed against taxable income. Then issues claims to circumvent and claim the full amount of debt to maximise profit.

 

2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. When an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party

 

3. On or around the xxth May 2017, I received a claim form from the county court Business Centre, Northampton, for a credit card amount of £1XXXXX..Given that I could not recall the precise details of the alleged agreement or if there were any outstanding balances given the passage of time and lack of any communication from the original creditor or the claimant Assignee I initially submitted a statute barred defence as my defence dated xxxxxxx.It has since transpired after speaking to the original creditor that it was not statute barred and therefore request the court’s permission that the evidence presented in this witness statement supersedes my initial defence.

 

4. On the xxth June 2017 I made a formal written request to the Claimant,[Exhibit A] sent by recorded delivery [Exhibit B] and including a £1 fee (which was cashed) for them to provide me with a copy of my consumer credit Agreement as per the claimants particulars as entitled to do so under sections 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

5. On the xxth June I made a CPR 31.14 formal written request to the claimant’s solicitor, [Exhibit C] sent by recorded delivery,[Exhibit B] which was received and signed for.

In particular I enquired for information including: Notice of assignment and The Default Notice. The claimant has not complied with my full requests and has only sent partial documentation (Notice of assignment) despite my endeavours to inspect all of these documents and try to resolve this matter without it proceeding further.

6. The claimant’s solicitor stated, on the letter received on xxth of June 2017 that a request for the agreement and default notice had been forwarded to their client and they would forward the documents to me upon receipt. This is yet to happen.

7. None of the issues raised within the claimant’s statement offers any tangible evidence. The evidence provided by way of exhibits is woefully deficient and invalid and not pursuant to the CCA1974.

 

Unless the claimant can disclose a true executed copy of the agreement complete with terms and conditions and signed, that they refer to within its particulars of this claim, they are not entitled while the default continues, to enforce the alleged agreement pursuant to section 77.4 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974.

 

It is therefore respectfully requested that the court dismiss this claim.

 

Statement of Truth

 

I, --------------- the Defendant, believe the facts stated within this Witness Statement to be true.

 

 

Signed: _________________________ _______

 

Dated: _________________________ _______

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court /Solicitor/your File

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

opps

ring the court Monday and ask if they've received the fleecers WS as you haven't

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And inform the court they have failed to comply with directions and and ask they be barred from relying on any.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

Thanks for your respoinse. I called mid last week and the court confirmed nothing had been received. The person I spoke to said it would be up to the judge whether they would accept their WS or not

I will call again today and see if anything has been received

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

I called the court this morning and they informed me that the case has been discontinued and that I claimant should have advised me of this as they do not.

I have no written confirmation of this from the Solicitor. Should I call them and ask for something in writing ?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

no need

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought that would be the outcome...well done WS

 

You dont need anything from the Lowell..the court has been informed...Lowell didn't even have the decency to serve notice on you..just shows and confirms our attitude in dealing with them.

 

Thread title amended to reflect the outcome.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...