Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclays Bank Refusing to Action Customer Instructions


TheLeeds
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2532 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I visited a Barclays bank branch in February.

 

 

Whilst there, I paid a cheque into my current account.

 

 

I then asked for funds to be transferred from my current account to my Barclaycard Visa card, in order to clear the outstanding balance.

 

 

The cashier asked for my debit card PIN, which I had never been given, after which she refused to process my instruction.

This is despite my being able to use the card for online payments.

By refusing to transfer the funds, the bank had effectively declined to allow me access to my own money.

 

The cashier then said she could arrange for a new PIN to be sent to me, and then proceeded to ask for my mother’s maiden name.

I told her I was not prepared to disclose this verbally in a bank full of customers.

 

 

She then pushed a piece of paper under the window so I could write down the answers to the security questions.

Once I had correctly answered them, she proceeded to order a new PIN for me, but still refused to process the payment I had requested.

 

I wrote to their customer services department to complain, and to ask for their assurance that such a regrettable situation would not be repeated.

 

 

I explained that there is no conceivable scenario under which anyone would attempt to pay off my Barclaycard from my Barclays current account for fraudulent reasons, and of course, nobody other than myself would attempt to do it because the only person who would benefit is me.

I then received a text message from Barclays, despite having previously written to them to say I did not wish to be contacted by text.

I followed up my original complaint letter and asked them to remove my mobile number from their system.

 

I then received a letter from them in which they acknowledged my complaint, and asked me to confirm that the mobile number they had for me was up to date (yes, that’s right folks, the one I’d already asked them not to contact me on.)

I didn’t get a reply to my next letter so I wrote again and asked them for their response.

 

About a month later,

they wrote to me and said that because they had taken so long to address the issues raised in my complaint,

I was now entitled to ask the FOS to become involved.

 

 

I wrote back and said I thought it was ludicrous that they were happy for this to happen rather than deal with it themselves.

I asked for £150 compensation for the time I’d had to spend dealing with the matter.

 

A few more weeks later,

I received a letter telling me they’d finished their investigation.

 

 

In this letter, amongst other things, they said,

“If a customer does not have their PIN with them, we would then attempt to identify the customer by asking security questions instead.”

 

This kind of misses the point I’d made in my initial letter to them,

which is that the cashier did ask me security questions,

which I answered correctly,

but she still refused to process the transaction.

 

 

The letter went on to say that no bank error occurred, and they thought they had followed the correct procedure.

They did add however, that because of the time they had taken to resolve the complaint, they had credited my account with £100.

 

The interesting thing here, is that they haven’t resolved the complaint.

The statement in their letter regarding attempting to identify customers by asking security questions is at odds with what happened next.

 

 

I visited the same branch yesterday,

this time armed with the PIN they’d recently sent me.

I asked if I could transfer funds from my current account to pay off a Barclaycard balance, a

nd when I keyed in the PIN,

the terminal said it was incorrect.

 

 

I offered to sign for the transaction instead,

but the cashier refused to accept this.

 

 

I offered to answer security questions,

but this was refused as well.

 

 

I explained the statement made in their most recent letter regarding identifying customers by asking security questions, but the answer was still no.

 

I told them I’d already made a formal complaint about the first time they’d refused to allow me access to my own money and that I intended to do the same again.

 

 

By the time I left, there was a queue of at least six other customers behind me.

One of them congratulated me for my persistence as I was leaving, and said he’d experienced similar problems with them.

 

 

On the basis of the above, I have now filed a complaint with the FOS, who were very helpful when I had a dispute last year with Santander, and who obtained a satisfactory outcome for me.

 

I’ll let you know what happens with this one.

In the meantime, has anyone else had any similar experiences with Barclays or any of the other banks ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Leeds,

 

I don't see that you have a serious complaint but each to their own.

 

It's not unreasonable for the staff to require your PIN No. and, on each occasion, you were unable to give the PIN No. that the system recognised. If the system was at fault on the 2nd occasion, then that was cause for a valid complaint.

 

However, you've already had £100 in compensation and I doubt the FOS will give you much more.

 

Time will tell .............

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe you missed the bit where I said...

 

A few more weeks later, I received a letterlink3.gif telling me they’d finished their investigation. In this letter, amongst other things, they said, “If a customer does not have their PIN with them, we would then attempt to identify the customer by asking security questions instead.”

This kind of misses the point I’d made in my initial letter to them, which is that the cashier did ask me security questions, which I answered correctly, but she still refused to process the transaction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Leeds,

 

No, I didn't miss anything of what you posted.

 

Your answer to the security question was perhaps why they agreed to process the request for the PIN to be re-issued.

 

I'm just being objective and, from your post, I'm not convinced you have a valid complaint that is likely to succeed, beyond the compensation you've already received.

 

But you should do what you want so proceed by all means and keep us posted ............

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think on receipt of any debit card the first thing I would be looking for or requesting is the PIN number...otherwise it renders the Debit Card only useful for on line transactions.

 

Alternatively if you never had need for a PIN number and therefore never questioned why you never received it..pay the cheque into the current account..wait for it to clear and then pay the Barclaycard Visa Card on line ?

 

Just another angle to consider.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another illogical thing about their behaviour, is that if I phoned them, I could answer the security questions, and then they would credit the money to the card account of my choosing, however, the branch staff refusal to do exactly the same thing does raise the perfectly valid question, which is this. What's the point in having a branch if they refuse to carry out the legitimate instructions of their customers ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There wont be any branches in another 5/10 years.....more secure on line than face to face ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Leeds,

 

No, I didn't miss anything of what you posted.

 

Your answer to the security question was perhaps why they agreed to process the request for the PIN to be re-issued.

 

I'm just being objective and, from your post, I'm not convinced you have a valid complaint that is likely to succeed, beyond the compensation you've already received.

 

But you should do what you want so proceed by all means and keep us posted ............

 

:-)

 

as stated above:-

 

you do not have a case - you are lucky to get what you got as many of us had to do at an early age Gxxx Ux

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...