Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tax Credit Overpayment


rippedoff15
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2261 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well just had 2 letters from HMRC stating that they have overpaid the tax credits

 

2014 - £768.78

2015 - £1413.13

2016 - £1577.99 ( Estimated )

 

Total of £3,759.90

 

Called them tonight regarding the issue,

 

1, HMRC asked for payment in full tonight - My reply was cannot pay in full

2, HMRC then asked pay in full in 14 days - My reply the same cannot pay in full

3, HMRC then asked if i can borrow the money to clear the amount in full - My reply was your joking borrow

 

They has stated i can pay each month at their agreed rate of £80.00

or they will pass on to debt collection firm who will add charges,

being forced to pay an amount which we cannot afford.

 

Has anyone got any information how to deal with HMRC

 

 

:mad2::mad2::mad2::mad2::mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

They explained the over payment over the telephone nothing has been sent in writing only letter requesting the payment. I was thinking of requesting detailing information for all the years which they state this refers to and see if its right or wrong.

 

If the over payment is correct can they demand min payment of £80.00 as this means we cannot pay other bills

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them the free sar

make them prove their data exists

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well i have sent the SAR request and just had a letter asking me which years of information. i have sent the reply and now waiting. I have had a call asking me to set up the repayment plan but i have told them i want to wait until all the information is supply and reviewed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

who called?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well always ask first

could be the fleecing DCA trying it on again..

you should not be blindly ever discussing debt over the phone when you don't know WHO you are talking too!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well still no information from the DWP relating to this over payment,

i have had a letter this morning formally demanding the payment and if i refuse this will be passed to collection firm.

 

The letter is listed as Letter before Action.

On the back of the letter is a list of the amounts and date 2014 & 2015.

 

I have sent the SPA but had no reply nor acknowledgement,

should i ring them or jus wait to see if they send details as requested.

 

They also state the collection company can take goods and sell at public auction, don`t they have to obtain CCJ from the courts ?

 

Well just had 2 recorded jiffy bags with the information, well they only enclosed a CD disc with telephone conversations which frankly is joke,

 

i have requested the actual details of the amounts claimed, paid and any other information.

 

I have telephoned them this morning and told the SPA only refers to telephone details and not how the work out the sums.

 

Not sure now how to resolve this issue as HMRC were not helpful

Link to post
Share on other sites

why are they not providing documentary proof

something smells here.

like they don't have it

 

 

as for any DCA

ignore!!

 

 

 

 

I take it by SPA you mean SAR?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was hoping by requesting the SAR from HMRC they should have sent detailed information about each claim by year and not just the telephone information. i will be writing again requesting this information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well if they don't they cant prove their claim..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well just had a parcel today with over 360 papers of information, mainly screen shots the information is hard to understand and now a little confused were to start in resolving this issue. Also had another letter stating the file has now been pasted to debt collection as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well you totally ignore the DCA.

 

 

prove or disprove their claim you owe money

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

well nothing from HMRC but getting letters from DCA stating final demand,

 

i have written 3 times requesting the information but nothing is sent only demands for money,

they are now stating they will apply for attachment to my earns ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the DCA can do nothing of the sort

they are not bailiffs

and are totally powerless

 

so did the sar prove or disprove their claim you owe anything.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

The DCA are totally irrelevant here, just ignore them. If there is any payment arrangement to be made here, it should be discussed with HMRC. Have you looked up the COP 26. This is the HMRC 's own code of practice, look at page 15! Just Google Tax Credits COP 26, it's on GOV.UK.

 

On my SAR, it turned out Tax Credits had my salary as £6000 per year higher, and had lied about a phone call. Perhaps this will give you a clue as what to look for.

 

In fact read through the whole of COP 26, there are a whole host of mitigating factors that can be used in an appeal. For example if your joint claiming partner has left, chronic illness, mental illness etc.

 

My overpayment was massive compared with yours and the Tax Credit's were talking about me paying £50 per month, so I am sure your fears of £80 per month are just fearmongering from the powerless DCA.

 

You can always attempt to make another claim for Tax Credits too, if that is successful they will stop trying to collect and start deducting from your award, even if it's only £20 per month!

  • Haha 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

as post 20

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well now getting letters from Advantis debt collection demanding money, yet again nothing from HMRC regarding the over payment dating back to 2009,2010 and 2014.

 

Well they are refusing to confirm details and now ringing our home telephone,

i have requested them to confirm everything in writing but they just said they will keep on ringing until i accept the debt and set up repayment plan.

They can take a run and jump just a bunch of clowns

Link to post
Share on other sites

stop answering them

block their number

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...