Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance claim for engagement ring


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2547 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Perfectly genuine in case you were wondering. Wife lost ring that she's had for 25 years. :-( Gutted.

 

Do have personal possessions insurance cover. BUT insurance company are saying I need receipt or valution. Who keeps a receipt for 25 years? Also I can't get something valued I dont have. Ive tried to get in touch with the orignal jewellers but they went bust a few years ago.

 

Appreciate they need to be careful of fraud. Can imagine its all too easy to say you've lost a ring. MArriage breakups etc.

BUT I have no issues with them paying direct for a replacement. I appreciate that what may have cost £500-£600 25 years ago is more now.

 

How does it normally work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have photographs of your wife wearing the ring?

 

Basically the insurance co need some proof that the ring existed and that it matches your description, so if all else fails they may accept a photo.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

valuation has been advised expensive rings for decades now , also told to revalue every few years for insurance purposes especially as said high value as you would need to declare it on insurance application/renewals, that is why premiums on rings can go up due to extended value over time, hearsay does not work in these circumstances as you suggest cost £500 n-£600 at ther time, my O.H. ring cost me over £1250+ few decades ago and the value has gone up somewhat with valuation so recorded on policy renewals/applications.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have photographs of your wife wearing the ring?

 

Basically the insurance co need some proof that the ring existed and that it matches your description, so if all else fails they may accept a photo.

 

Trawling through now. Obviously you rarely photograph someones hand directly though....

Link to post
Share on other sites

valuation has been advised expensive rings for decades now , also told to revalue every few years for insurance purposes especially as said high value as you would need to declare it on insurance application/renewals, that is why premiums on rings can go up due to extended value over time, hearsay does not work in these circumstances as you suggest cost £500 n-£600 at ther time, my O.H. ring cost me over £1250+ few decades ago and the value has gone up somewhat with valuation so recorded on policy renewals/applications.

 

Yes would have been wise I realise now. I never bothered because the limit on policy to declare items is £2000 and I assumed it was under that.

 

Having had a quick look at a few jewellers I can see its possible to buy a similar ring for approx £1500.

 

Totally appreciate where insurance companies are coming from with this but surely a large proportion of claimants must be the same as me? i.e. Not having receipts/valuations...

 

After this, I'll be making sure I get valuations done. Funnily enough we did get valuation for her pandora (full!) bracelet because I'd heard that insurace companies were very wary of claims like this).

Link to post
Share on other sites

old photo of engagement party / hand raised to show ring on finger? some people keep photos of these events?

 

 

was it reported lost to the police?

 

Yes its been listed on their system as a lost item. Like I said I'll have to trawl through old photos I think.....

 

Wife has her nails done sometimes so I'm hoping she took photo once to show her friends or something!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was informed by a jeweller freind who sold it to me albeit small discount as freind but he insisted I keep valuation certificate as he has had people with the problem you have, so he made sure he aadvised me to cover her ring that way! otherwise like you the £2000 limit would be taken as done no doubt?

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I was informed by a jeweller freind who sold it to me albeit small discount as freind but he insisted I keep valuation certificate as he has had people with the problem you have, so he made sure he aadvised me to cover her ring that way! otherwise like you the £2000 limit would be taken as done no doubt?

 

Fortunately, I think £2000 would more than cover a replacement. It was bought originally from an upmarket independent jeweller though so Im hoping we don't get a voucher for samuels or something!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth searching on the FOS site for their general way of dealing with similar complaints and any case examples.

 

Photos will help you, just evidence a ring regularly worn. A statement about where it was bought, rough details of ring description, when it was bought and price paid. Report loss to Police just in case found in a piblic place and handed in.

 

If you buy a ring for say £600 from retail jewellers, because of the massive mark ups, the actual rings gold/silver and jewels value would have been less than £200. Based on average typical mark ups, it is possible to approximate likely cost of replacement from wholesaler.

 

Once the claim for loss is accepted, it would be passed to a wholesale jeweller who would look at a replacement with similar. It won't be a cash settlement or using any jeweller of your choice.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth searching on the FOS site for their general way of dealing with similar complaints and any case examples.

 

Photos will help you, just evidence a ring regularly worn. A statement about where it was bought, rough details of ring description, when it was bought and price paid. Report loss to Police just in case found in a piblic place and handed in.

 

If you buy a ring for say £600 from retail jewellers, because of the massive mark ups, the actual rings gold/silver and jewels value would have been less than £200. Based on average typical mark ups, it is possible to approximate likely cost of replacement from wholesaler.

 

Once the claim for loss is accepted, it would be passed to a wholesale jeweller who would look at a replacement with similar. It won't be a cash settlement or using any jeweller of your choice.

 

Cheers. Loss has been reported to Police but I dont hold up much hope there. Its probably in cash converters by now!

Description is easy enough, wife remembers spec (i.e. 18ct gold, diamond size, and approx price - she remembers because, I can't remember why, she had to use her bank account for the DD for a year!)

 

Like I said, don't need cash, just a replacement from a decent jeweller.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers. Loss has been reported to Police but I dont hold up much hope there. Its probably in cash converters by now!

Description is easy enough, wife remembers spec (i.e. 18ct gold, diamond size, and approx price - she remembers because, I can't remember why, she had to use her bank account for the DD for a year!)

 

Like I said, don't need cash, just a replacement from a decent jeweller.

 

When you say decent jeweller, if your claim is accepted, don't automatically presume the Insurers wholesale jeweller is an inferior option. Most Jewllery sold on the high street is mass manufactured and sold for silly marked up prices. In most cases the Insurers wholsaler will offer a much better replacement for the claim value. An Insurers voucher in a high street jewellers won't obtain a ring of the same quality.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you say decent jeweller, if your claim is accepted, don't automatically presume the Insurers wholesale jeweller is an inferior option. Most Jewllery sold on the high street is mass manufactured and sold for silly marked up prices. In most cases the Insurers wholsaler will offer a much better replacement for the claim value. An Insurers voucher in a high street jewellers won't obtain a ring of the same quality.

 

OK good to know - thanks. Im just aware that not all diamond rings are created equal thats all. And that certain high street jewellers products are lower end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...