Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell chasing Argos card debt payment


hollysmum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2363 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon!

 

My husband has received the above two documents

(I am hopefully attaching redacted scans to this post)

and, as he's currently in hospital,

 

I need to try and deal with them in his absence.

 

I presume we should respond in some way,

although I'm not totally convinced that this debt is his

- he says he doesn't recall taking out a credit card with Home Retail Group.

 

I certainly don't want to phone them or email them!

It's clearly not statute-barred, as it dates from 2012.

 

My hubby says that he can recall getting "some guff or other" (his words!) from Lowell in the past,

 

but because he didn't know what they were talking about,

he ignored it.

 

Therefore, I haven't a hope of identifying what might have been received previously, or not.

 

Your always excellent advice would be very much appreciated as to my next step.

Scan Lowell 2.pdf

Scan Lowell 1.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess that you do not have access to your husbands credit report ? If not, perhaps you can ask him whether you can access it for him, so you can see what debts are registered.

 

I doubt Lowell would respond to any letter from you about the debt, but you could send a standard letter to Lowell asking for more information, just printing your husbands name and not signed by him. This is the letter. You could amend it to state that you believe a miss trace has happened, as no account has been taken out with Home Retail Group to your knowledge.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387363-You-know-nothing-of-the-Debt-Prove-It-**Updated-21st-April-2014**

 

Get proof of posting from post office counter.

 

The danger in not responding at all, is that at some stage, it will get passed to Lowells Solicitors who will eventually issue a court claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Attachments hidden

Not properly redacted

 

So an old Argos credit card then

 

When was his last use or payment??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah! Argos would make sense

- how on earth did I miss that?

 

Please put it down to stress, dx,

that and the fact that I neglected to totally redact

- my apologies.

 

I know he had an Argos card some years ago,

I'll check that with him,

and ask if I can check his credit report.

 

As you can imagine,

he's not really at his best at the moment.

 

I will take a good look at the link posted by Uncle Bulgaria and at least hold them at bay with a request for further information.

 

Dx - until I've had a bit more of a delve,

no idea about the last payment made.

 

If indeed it is his card,

then I suspect it would have been around the time he was made redundant,

about 18 months ago.

 

He's since been forced to retire because of his continuing poor health,

which is really why I want to try and sort this out in some way,

even if it means setting up some payment plan via Lowlife.

 

Many thanks for your responses, dx and Bulgaria.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was Argos, was it just in his name or were you a second card holder ?

 

If it was taken out in 2012, then it would be pretty easy for Lowell to get a CCJ, as they don't need the original signed CCA. Given Lowells probably only paid 10% of the debts value, you might be able to negotiate a full and final settlement, rather than enter into a repayment over a long period.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, unclebulgaria - unless the full and final settlement was about a tenner,

that might not be possible,

 

I totally get what you're saying!

He's got no savings,

and his redundancy pay out was under £2000,

not a lot of that left now.

 

He's actually on the standard old age pension now,

doesn't have any other income,

we'd be looking at quite a small amount each month or whatever.

 

We'll see what happens when I ask them for some further information.

I've never had an Argos card,

and certainly not been named on this one,

if indeed it is his.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't go blindly writing not even contemplate paying till you get all the info you can

 

Then comeback here first

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't go blindly writing not even contemplate paying till you get all the info you can

 

Then comeback here first

 

No, certainly not, dx

- I've printed off the template letter,

and will be composing something around that to send off asking for further information.

 

I'm seeing hubby this evening in the hospital,

so hope to take a draft in to him.

 

We're not going to rush anything,

and yes,

I will certainly post up here again.

 

Thank you so much for your help so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you are going to send anything

it will be a CCA request

 

 

don't go inviting silly letter tennis by sending that letters...waste of time.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you made one big blunder

 

can you spot it on the top line in RED??

[the 2nd time you've done this....]

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I shall now attempt to improve my shameful performance in respect of asking your advice and seeming to totally ignore the completely clear instructions regarding the template letters. I have typed up a CCA request under Section 78 of the Act - am I OK to attach a redacted copy of my draft?

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCA other than filling in your details needs nothing to be checked upon..

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just a little update, as I managed to enrage all you wonderful people on here with my clumsy attempts at submitting requests to Lowlife. So far, my husband has received a letter from them telling him that they are attempting to acquire a copy of the "original documentation" from the original debt owner. I understand that there is a deadline of forty days from us receiving their letter? That means they've got until around 30th June.

 

 

Thank you all again for your help with this, I really appreciate it. Catherine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have 12+2 working days end of!!

And until they comply with enforceable paperwork stop paying if you were

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, dx! No, he's paid nothing.

 

 

Very nice to know it's a mere 12 days plus 2

- that means they're already well out of date.

 

 

40 days is what Lowlife mentioned in their letter to my husband, in reference to the original creditor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going by reports, it can be many months before a CCA is provided and often they never get around to it.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

A teeny update on this one.

 

 

My husband had a letter from Lowlife telling him that, thus far, they've not received a copy of the agreement from the original creditor.

This arrived on Thursday last week.

 

 

Of course, being the diligent souls that they are, they say that they will continue to press for the information, but in the meantime, the account has been put on hold.

 

 

Intriguingly, he received a letter from the OC on Saturday saying that there were charges applied to the account they sold to Lowells which should not have been applied, and that they have therefore written to tell Lowells this. Whether this affects the "on hold" status of the account, I don't know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's what they said in their letter, Andyorch - "until such time as we receive this information, the account has been put on hold". It was really just me wondering how Lowlife might construe the copy of the letter from the OC - perhaps I'm far too suspicious for my own good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Good morning!

 

 

I'm just posting another little update on this.

 

 

The last my husband heard from Lowlife was back in June, when they said that, whilst they'd been unable as yet to obtain a copy of any agreement, they would continue to try to do so, and therefore the account was on hold for the time being.

It's around 65 days since that contact.

 

 

On Friday, a "Signed For" envelope arrived for him - it was from Lowlife, a whole chunk of copied statements, no sign of any agreement at all.

Am I correct to think that they are well out of time now for responding to his CCA request, and that the account would still be on hold?

Does he need to respond in some way to Lowlife?

As always, my grateful thanks to you all. Catherine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...