Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
    • Probably the case @lookinforinfo Also an update, I've got the registered keeper letter. Just to check that I continue to ignore it until PAP letter comes in?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TFL - fare evasion, help plz


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2542 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

No. They've asked you to write / e-mail, so write or email.

 

If you call you might get flustered (you mentioned you panicked when questioned).

They might also ask questions they haven't already asked like "have you previously travelled without paying your fare" ; if they haven't asked this in what they've written you don't have to volunteer information they haven't asked for (just in case answering truthfully might be a problem......)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I quite liked the original "gavelling letter"

 

Combination of typoitis and auto-correct?

 

 

I've heard they like letters written on sand paper

frukes their scanners up lovely

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Many thanks for your letter dated [] of Reference [] and offering me the opportunity to reply back to you.

 

On [date], I took a train from West drayton to Shepherd Bush. I did not touch in when I entered the station as I was running very late and I had to give the presentation to the client. It was a new client and I was quite nervous in the morning due to that.

 

When I come out at the Shepherd Bush station, I also used the wrong card and that was because both the Oyster card and tesco card were in the same pocket. Once I was stopped by the revenue inspector, I realized that I used the wrong card. I did show my registered Oyster card to the revenue inspector and it did have enough money to cover the cost of travel. I immediately realized my mistake and apologized to the inspector. I would also like to offer you my sincere apologies for my actions on [date].

 

I spent most of my time on train and tube to prepare for my presentation to the client and I seriously apologize for my absent mindedness on the morning of [date].

 

I am extremely fearful of the potential consequences on my current and future employment as I work in information technology and they take criminal conviction very seriously.

 

I am also extremely worried about the impact of me having a criminal conviction on my record to the extension of my wife's visa as criminal conviction is taken very seriously.

 

This incident made me extremely worried and stressed and I would like to take this opportunity to assure you that I am feeling deeply ashamed and embarrassed with the whole situation. I am so sorry and I am disgusted with my behaviour on this occasion. I certainly learnt from this experience and I again reassure you that I will never ever let that mistake happen again in future.

 

I think of myself as a valuable part of the community and I would like to give back to community by providing my voluntary services to the charity of your choice.

 

I pledge you to allow me to make the necessary compensation to your company, therefore If possible, I would like to remedy this situation and avoid it being escalated further by way of an administrative settlement. I would like to offer payment of the appropriate outstanding fare and to cover any additional administrative costs you have incurred, due to my poor actions.

 

Look forward to hearing from you soon.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

too much waffle...

 

 

use your nervousness to your advantage.

 

 

it will have no bearing at all on your wifes' visa ..ditch that.

 

 

ditch the charity bit

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

too much waffle...

 

 

use your nervousness to your advantage.

 

 

it will have no bearing at all on your wifes' visa ..ditch that.

 

 

ditch the charity bit

 

 

dx

 

:(

 

home office do perform DBS check on both applicant and sponsor, if my criminal conviction flagged up on either of dbs checks, surely her visa will be rejected.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thank you for your letter of [date].

its contents are duly noted and I would very much like to take up your kind offer of allowing me to explain the reasons for the unfortunate situation that I found myself in.

 

on the day of the incident my employment had tasked me to give a very important presentation to one of their most valued clients.

This, in my current role, was a potential leader toward further movement within the company, and if I were to be honest, was still not of a standard I was happy with.

 

I took a train from West drayton to Shepherd Bush.

I did not touch in when I entered the station as I was running very late due to the above.

 

I spent most of my time on train and tube still ruining through this presentation to the client.

 

I arrived at the Shepherd Bush station and mistakenly used my Tesco clubcard at the barrier, that and my Oyster card are kept in the same pocket.

 

Your system correctly alerted to the error and I was approached by the revenue inspector,

 

It was then I realised the card mistake and presented my registered Oyster card to the revenue inspector.

The Card was checked and this confirmed it had enough credit to cover the cost of the travel in question.

 

I would like to offer you my sincere apologies for my actions .

 

I am extremely fearful of the potential consequences on my current and future employment as I work in information technology and they take criminal conviction very seriously.

 

I would like to take this opportunity to assure you that I am feeling deeply ashamed and embarrassed with the whole situation.

 

 

I am so sorry and I am disgusted with my behaviour on this occasion.

 

I have certainly learnt from this experience and I again reassure you that I will never ever let such a mistake happen again in future.

 

I offer to you any reasonable monetary sums equivalent to any related fines and administrative fees you have incurred to allow me to keep my criminal record clear.

 

This would have a very negative effect upon my future employment as my presentation that caused this situation to occur was received very well and impressed my employers, it would be such a shame for this incident to wash that success away.

 

Once again, I apologise for my actions and hope you will take the matter for what it was and allow me to suitably resolve the matter to our mutual satisfaction.

 

yours

etc

 

 

Look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours faithfully,

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Doesn't address the obvious question : how did the OP get from Network Rail to TfL ;the barriers may have been open at West Drayton but what happened at the interchange (Paddington? Ealing Broadway??)

 

Of course, they haven't overtly asked you that so if answering it may be damaging you may decide to skip over that. Did the Revenue staff enquire? (they'll marry up your answer with the report / notes they made).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

No barrier at Ealing Broadway interchange.

 

My question to the op is:

you said that you used your Tesco card to exit at shepherd bush. Is this a contactless credit card?

 

Did it work the gate, so you touched and the barrier opened?

 

If so,

you have paid a maximum fare which is your fare for the journey, although more than standard fare.

 

Check your Tesco card statement and if there's a charge for that journey, you have paid.

 

If that's the case you need to send TfL a copy of your statement with the charge highlighted and simply tell them that you mistakenly used your Tesco card instead of the oyster but then produced the oyster card to the revenue inspector.

 

As this card had not been used at the barrier, the inspector reported you.

 

In simple terms,

you did fail to produce a ticket on request, but you had paid with your Tesco card.

 

If all checks out, prosecution would be very unlikely because you have paid for your journey.

 

Let us know if there's a charge on the Tesco card please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I stupidly used my tesco club card to touch out instead of oyster card as both were in the same pocket.

 

My question to the op is: you said that you used your Tesco card to exit at shepherd bush. Is this a contactless credit card?

 

Tesco club card or tesco credit card (or even clubcard credit card .....!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tesco club card or tesco credit card (or even clubcard credit card .....!)

 

No, it was a normal tesco club card and not a credit card.

 

I don't know whether it gave a green light when I touched the card but definitely barriers were still open.

 

 

It was a long queue of people,

so either I managed to come out of barriers because of tailgating

or person behind me touched his card early enough to make the barriers open.

 

If barriers would have remain closed once I touched my card,

that could clearly show me that the card I am using not a oyster card

and could resolve the situation there and then without any involvement from RI.

 

I don't know where the technology is taking us?

Link to post
Share on other sites

a Tesco clubcard has only a magnetic swipe strip not a RF chip

 

I would suggest he saw you tailgate

and then things unfolded from there.

 

quite honestly i'd not bother explaining further.

 

you only need to answer the questions regarding travel for which they are indicating they want the explanation for

whether or not you travelled on another system to get that far and how you paid or didn't is somewhat immaterial.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it was a normal tesco club card and not a credit card.

 

I don't know whether it gave a green light when I touched the card but definitely barriers were still open.

 

 

It was a long queue of people,

so either I managed to come out of barriers because of tailgating

or person behind me touched his card early enough to make the barriers open.

 

If barriers would have remain closed once I touched my card,

that could clearly show me that the card I am using not a oyster card

and could resolve the situation there and then without any involvement from RI.

 

I don't know where the technology is taking us?

 

In this case, grovelling letter as suggested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I offer to you any reasonable monetary sums equivalent to any related fines and administrative fees you have incurred to allow me to keep my criminal record clear.

 

Please advice what should be the reasonable amount I should offer them in my letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please advice what should be the reasonable amount I should offer them in my letter?

 

You see what they say you'll need to cough up.

 

It'll likely be less than you'd be fined, but one disadvantage compared with a fine from a court, you'll need to pay it in one lump sum (no installment option!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

you mean likely to be less than 1000£ (Max fine)?

 

Certainly. Have a look at other, similar, threads to see what people have been asked to pay for 'administrative settlements'

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh a lot less

 

 

might even just be a couple £100

theres one here that was simply the fare and £40 admin

another @£240.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

rubbish waste of money

 

 

yes if you'd been doing this for months possibly

but this was an honest mistake

 

 

if you read this forum

then you'll see 99% result is a very small sum to sort the matter.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

rubbish waste of money

 

 

yes if you'd been doing this for months possibly

but this was an honest mistake

 

 

if you read this forum

then you'll see 99% result is a very small sum to sort the matter.

 

 

dx

 

That's what I thought as well and these solicitors are asking at least 600£ to draft a letter. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had spoken to couple of my good friends and they are STRONGLY suggesting me to hire a solicitor instead of me writing to TFL, what do you guys think?

 

Why do they say they suggest this? (& so strongly too!)

 

Have they dealt with this lots before?? (by comparison with the many cases CAG has helped with).

 

Are they suggesting a particular solicitor with special expertise in such cases / railway law?.

 

What extra are you getting for your money (and the risk TfL may react less favourably ......)?

 

 

Ohh, and given it is a Bank Holiday Monday, and you only got the letter Saturday evening ....I'm surprised you've been able to speak to a solicitor about it already for them to quote you £600.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Ohh, and given it is a Bank Holiday Monday, and you only got the letter Saturday evening ....I'm surprised you've been able to speak to a solicitor about it already for them to quote you £600.....

 

This is the first time it happened to me and none of my friends (who suggested for solicitor) even involved with fare evasion. They did not suggest any particular solicitor but advised me to speak to them before I write to TFL.

 

Even I am not in favour to use the solicitor, but I thought I should run the idea on the forum and hence the question.

 

At least 3 solicitors I have spoken to yesterday have 24 hr helpline, I called them, left the message and they returned my call and one of them even sent an email with their T&C.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...