Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bought house at auction no survey done. Now possible subsidence.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2548 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Helping someone .

 

 

I bought my house in a auction and knew the house was suffering from some sort of damp problem.

I never had a survey done as there was no mortgage and there was a damp problem.

 

 

I have managed to sort that out and will be having a damp course done in a few weeks time.

However now some 16 months on cracks have started to appear on inside walls.

 

 

These are vertical ones and are very thin.

I have checked the wall above and because it has wall paper on cannot check if the cracks have gone up.

 

 

I did however contact my insurance company who took down the claim an are in the middle of appointing a Surveyor to come out and inspect this.

 

 

Do i have anything to worry about if i cannot produce a survey ?

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully Ericsbrother will pop in to help, he may be better placed to guve some help.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not wise to contact the Insurers at this stage, as the claim will be noted as subsidence and appear on the central insurers database. If it turns out to be settlement due to the damp issues and not subsidence, you need to ask the Insurers to amend the claim peril of subsidence, as it was found to be irrelevant.

 

Small verticle cracks can appear for a number of reasons. If they run straight, it might just be where plasterboards join. You should have got a builder or surveyor to have a look before contacting Insurers.

 

Ask yourself questions at to why cracks have appeared now 16 months on. It might just be that cracks were painted over or filled previously and they are just showing. If the cracks are thin and not spreading, it might be nothing to do with subsidence. If you search online for subsidence you will find loads of pictures of what it looks like.

 

Don't worry about survey and if asked say you did not get one. No knowledge of any defects, apart from a damp issue.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen these cracks. There is a small vertical crack in between the living and reception room . There are also vertical cracks along where there used to be a door and has been filled in by using plaster board. A builder did see this a few days ago and said he could see the middle where sliding doors go bowing down. the cracks are on both sides of the wall and level with each other. They were not there a few weeks ago. The family went on holiday and when they came back they noticed these cracks. The things i get involved in !!!

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be anything.

 

Renovations to house including load bearing walls.

 

Water/drainage leak under the house. Might be worth getting this checked, as water damaging foundations can cause severe costly damage.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesnt sound like subsidence as people commonly understand it and the lack of survey wont make any difference to an insurance claim as they take a decision based upon the known risks and the lack of survey will be one of the factors in deciding to offer you cover and at what price.

 

Knowing more about the house would be helpful,

its age,

what it is built out of,

where it is ( geological factors other than subsidence are a massive factor in house settlement/movement),

whether detached,

terrace etc.

 

 

If detached or semi detached you can run a laser level along a course of brickwork on the open sides and see if the building slopes in any direction.

 

 

Also, get a plan of all of the drains, sewers etc that are near the property.

The council should have a map of these.

A cracked pipe will wash away a lot of soil and subsoil from quite a smell leak over time.

 

Cracks of less than 5mm wide arent really structural but can point to other problems.

look in the loft at the beams and joists,

 

 

roof spreading due to old timbers moving is common and that pushes the walls apart.

Simple to tie them back together with either timber or metal struts.

 

 

If there is a loft conversion that may be the cause,

the extra weight and reduced rigidity of the roof and that would mean new steel beams putting in to bolt the roof/walls.

Not as expensive as it sounds

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have seen these cracks. There is a small vertical crack in between the living and reception room . There are also vertical cracks along where there used to be a door and has been filled in by using plaster board. A builder did see this a few days ago and said he could see the middle where sliding doors go bowing down. the cracks are on both sides of the wall and level with each other. They were not there a few weeks ago. The family went on holiday and when they came back they noticed these cracks. The things i get involved in !!!

 

The cracks above the sliding door area will undoubtedly be due to the lack of, or failing of a lintel above the opening.

Are there further cracks above this position on upper floors?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...