Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parking Eye Claimform - Euro Garages Deeside service Station,Parkway, Deeside indust


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2024 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

I hope you can help.

My daughter received a parking fine from these fine chaps at parking sly.

details listed below as requested.

Thanks in advance.

 

Name of the Claimant ? PARKING EYE LTD

 

Date of issue – 28/03/17

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.Claim for monies outstanding from the defendant, as registered keeper, in relation to a Parking Charge, Issued 28/10/16 for parking on private land in breach of the T+C's (the contract).

2.Parking Eyes ANPR system, Monitoring Euro Garages Deeside service Station,Parkway,Deeside industrial estate, Deeside, CH5 2NN, captured vehicle ******** entering and leaving the site, overstaying the max stay time.

3.The signage , clearly displayed at the entrance to and throughout the site, states that this is private land, managed by ParkingEye Ltd, and is a max stay site, along with other T+C's by by which those who park agree to be bound.

4.In accordance with the T+C's, the Parking Charge became payable.

Notice has been given under Sch 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, making the keeper liable.

Failure to update the keeper details with the DVLA resulted in the re-issuance of correspondence, permitting reduced payment.

This claim is in reference to Parking Charge(s) 3822**/******

 

What is the value of the claim? £175.00

 

Has the claim been issued by the Private parking Company

or was the PCN assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim ? Parking eye.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? N/A

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop up on the MCOL website detailed on the claimform.

.

register as an individual

note the long gateway number given

then log in

.

select respond to a claim and select the AOS box.

.

then using the details required from the claimform

.

defend all

leave jurisdiction unticked.

click thru to the end

confirm and exit MCOL.

.

get a CPR 31:14 request running to the solicitors

.

don't sign anything

.

to the solicitors

[Your address]

.

[Their address [solicitors]

.

[Date]

.

Dear Sir or Madam,

.

Re: (Claimant's name) v (Your name) Case No:

.

CPR 31.14 Request

.

On (date) I received the Claim Form in this case issued by you out of the (Name) county court.

.

I confirm having returned my acknowledgement of service to the court in which I indicate my intention to contest all of your claim.

.

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of [each of the following / the] document(s) mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

.

1. the contract between [parking company name] and the landowner that assigns the right to enter into contracts with the public and make claims in their own name,.

.

2.proof of planning permission granted for signage etc under the Town and Country Planning Act 2007

.

3.copies of the notice to driver, notice to keeper and any other correspondence from [insert Claimant Name] & [insert Solicitors Name} to the defendant that they intend to rely upon in court.

.

You should ensure compliance with your CPR 31 duties and ensure that the document(s) I have requested are disclosed at your earliest convenience..

.

Your CPR 31 duties extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for the originals of the documents I have requested, the better for you to be able to verify the document's authenticity and to provide me with a legible copy.

.

Further, where I have requested a copy of a document, the original of which is now in the possession of another person, you will have a right to possession of that document if you have mentioned it in your case. You must take immediate steps to recover and preserve it for the purpose of this case.

.

Where I have mentioned a document and there is in your possession more than one version of that same document owing to a modification, obliteration or other marking or feature, each version will be a separate document and you must provide a copy of each version of it to me. Your obligations extend to making a reasonable and proportionate search for any version(s) to include an obligation to recover and preserve such version(s) which are now in the possession of a third party.

.

In accordance with CPR 31.15© I undertake to be responsible for your reasonable copying costs incurred in complying with this CPR 31.14 request.

.

If you are unable to comply with this request within 14 days and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request please confirm in your response.

.

You are reminded that as this case is yet to be allocated to a track, CPR31:14 does apply, a refusal to comply because you 'think' at this stage you dont have too will be used against you in any filed defence.

.

Yours faithfully

.

TYPE YOUR NAME DO NOT SIGN IT

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

DX. Good to see you again. As usual you're a star. Thank you.

 

There is no address for the solicitor listed on the claim form.

There is only a name for the "Claimants Legal Representative".

The only addresses on there are for p e

 

Should I send it to PE's address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes PE

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, tell us about the event, particularly what the business of the premises is and what the maximum stay time was.

 

We will also need to see the signage at the site and will need pictures of the entrance from the public highway, we will need to know whether the signs are illuminated (so time of day of the event will be needed) and whether any signs scattered about the place are different to the one at the entrance.

 

PE's newer signs are generally hard to knock back so your daughter will also need to note the position of the signs on a simple plan of the site and show where her car was parked.

Edited by honeybee13
Paras.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The car park is used jointly for Starbucks, the petrol station shop which contains a subway and mac Donald's.

 

Also there is a car wash on the site.

The car was parked there at 4 pm in October.

So still light.

I'll get the pictures sorted later today and post up.

 

The maximum stay is 2 hours apparently.

 

The car was left there overnight.

 

I know she is in the wrong here by the way but I just hate paying these leaches!!

 

Thanks for all your help. You're awesome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, why was the car left there overnight,

does she work there or some compelling reason.

 

We did ask you to tell us about the event so please enlighten us.

 

we strongly dislike these parking co's making money by nefarious means but sometimes people have to accpt that they are their own worst enemies

 

We will need to know who owns the land if that is possible to determine,

it is unlikely to be any of the businesses there but often the wrong permissions have been given to PE so they dont have a legal basis for their claim.

 

your daughter should be doing some research into these matters or just do what most people in their twenties do and say it isnt fair and expect you to pay up for them,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks rricsbrother but I wanted legal help and not a lecture on how my daughter or I should behave.

 

If you can tell me if they have the right to do this or if it's all bs as usual I would be more than grateful.

 

If dd is in the wrong then she will pay. Not me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you answer the questions then you will get the advice that is pertinent to the situation.

 

 

It is difficult to give advice when we are getting the informaion through a third party,

this slows things down and the small differences that make or break a claim get missed so we would prefer it if you could get her to post for herself and that way we lose nothing in translation.

 

 

So far we know nothing about how this has come about,

there are thousands of threads in this forum and the rerquirements of what information is needed is made in most of them.

 

 

If you can read a few you will understand the what, wheres, whens etc.

If that is not forthcoming we cant help you

 

as for telling you whether they have a right, we dont know until we have all the facts.

 

In the meanwhile she should defend the claim by ticking the relevant box on the N1 form saying defend in full or go to moneyclaimonline and set up an account and do it that way.

 

As much as you want to help she has to do all of this because she is the one being sued and will have to attend court to defend if necessary not you.

 

as for the lecture?

I have 2 daughters of that age and I have to deal with this kind of thing on a regular basis but nothing seems to improve

 

 

so forcing them to do some of the donkey work may make them appreciate that it is of their making.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have looked on Google Street View at this site. There is one small sign on entry to the site but it's too far away for me to see the full details AND the image is from last year so signage may have changed in the interim.

 

Whilst late in the day, I would still try and find out who the contract is with. As there are many shops on the site, there may be a managing agent and if so they would have to show they have the authority to engage a parking firm.

If this is the case (management agency) the landowner will have needed to give them the authority to engage a parking company. Check with the local council on whether any planning permission was applied for the installation of cameras and signs.

 

As mentioned earlier, count the signs. The one at the entrance is easy to miss as it is surrounded by other signs. Pictures, lots of them and especially where she parked.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

have you done post 5 yet FL?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pop the pictures all into one multipage pdf file and attach that

then we can zoom at will on them

 

 

upload

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

thread tidied.

 

 

so they aren't going to disclose anything until / if it gets to the WS stage.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

opps....your defence was due Friday 28th by 4pm.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no just use the two line defence

available on numerous VCS EXCEL BW threads

use our search CAG box of the top red toolbar

 

 

file it via MCOL website

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get on to MCOL, do that immediately.

 

File this.

 

The defendant denies any contract existed between themselves and the claimant and put the claimant to strict proof of same.

 

 

 

It is imperative that you do this without any further delay. And as you're 13 days late, it's 50/50 as to whether or not you're going to get away with it. The courts are slightly more lenient when dealing with a LiP, but huh.png

  • Haha 1

Please note that my posts are my opinion only and should not be taken as any kind of legal advice.
In fact, they're probably just waffling and can be quite safely and completely ignored as you wish.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 year later...

what happened??

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...