Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Payplan ..Cover my payments.spoof PPI .me too!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2553 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I opened a CAG email tonight which contained info about the Payplan cover my payments possibly being PPI.

 

 

I called payplan in 2008 when my husband died suddenly.

We had quite alot of debt that we'd already started repaying together on our own but unfortunately it was in my name.

 

 

Payplan were great and put me on a debt management plan but I must've been paying the cover me payments fairly soon as when I eventually could cope with the thought of an IVA I got a letter changing the payments from debt management to IVA.

 

 

I haven't any of the cover me info now, just a few letters and the amounts I'd be paying over the 6 years of the IVA. I only thought to keep the IVA info.

 

I'm questioning paying this now as I can recognise that I wouldn't have been able to properly understand any implications at the time.

.I remember struggling to handle the most basic money conversation at the time,

I think I would've said yes to anything if it was advised due to my situation.

 

 

What also bothers me is that the scheme was discontinued in 2014?

Shouldn't I have been stopped from paying then?

I have a letter in 2016 saying my cover was now cancelled due to the IVA ending.

 

Lastly, at the end of my IVA I was asked to sign a form about any monies from PPI claims needing to be paid to creditors.

During my IVA I was told I had to claim any PPI through a company they use and the money would be used to pay creditors.

.this has been ongoing for years and is still ongoing.

.nothing has ever really come from it,

luckily I had reclaimed lloyds overdraft charges before any of this.

 

 

I'm fairly sure sure the letter states specifically about the creditors and doesn't cover future claims so would I be right in thinking this is a non issue regarding a possible cover me claim?

 

I've been advised already to send an SAR (?) which I'll do but any other reclaim help would be much appreciated..I know I've done it before but that was likely 10 years ago!! I feel much more intimidated this time round.

 

Thankyou so much

Link to post
Share on other sites

ah you have an IVA

pointless reclaiming anything

it will goto the trustees.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Poo...lol

 

even if they shouldn't have been asking me for it?

 

Ah well. At least I checked and didn't miss something I should have had, Thanks for reading and helping! Much appreciated :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but that's the way it unfolds

the bottom line is the IVA should probably never been entered into,

 

 

no checks are ever done by these advisors to IF the debts are legit

and are not inflated by things that can be challenged or reclaimed.

 

 

sorry but you got had........

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thanks for your input. I have no problems taking responsibility for my (our) debts..they were definitely legit, I couldn't afford enough to even touch the overinflated interest etc so I ended up paying alot less than I would've on a never ending Debt management plan.

 

Again, thankyou, the help is much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why were you changed from a DMP to an IVA? I did spot your other post on my thread and can quite understand why you wouldn't want to do a reclaim. My concern is that PayPlan are a commercial company and while they did free plans, they also charged for others which included IVA's. DMP's were free to utilise with Payplan.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted a time limit. I knew someone who had an IVA and they were happy with how it was all going and what research I did attracted me to them. I also paid less monthly than on the debt plan which at the time was a major draw. I just wanted to be able to see a time when it was all over whilst having been responsible enough to pay back a decent portion of our debts. It's been finished a year next month and I think it was one of the best things I could've done..! 😊

Link to post
Share on other sites

good

have you checked that all the debts in your IVA have now dropped off your credit file?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can do it free online at noddle & clearscore

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...