Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell/BW CCJ - old cat debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2233 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Long story short, lowell took me to court for an alledge debt of around £800

 

I sent the usual forms asking for proof of ownership of debt, statements of account, notice of transfer etc

 

After a month or so they sent back a few screen shots and handful of documents, none of which showed the correct amount being claimed.

The statement summary actually showed the amount owing as about £90

 

I challenged this by filling out an N244 form and asking for a strike out hearing since they had not provided the necessary documentation and asked for it to be dealt with without a hearing.

 

The court set a date without consulting me, it was a date that i was out of the country 1000 miles away.

 

I contacted the court to tell them I couldnt attend as I was away and wanted a new date for the hearing.

 

The court clerks told me to send an email stating why I couldnt attend and a new date would be set.

I sent over the email and I then left the country as planned.

 

While I was away I had limited access to my emails, I did receive one that said I must send proof that I am away or the hearing would go ahead in my absence.

 

Since I had no IT equipment with me or anywhere to find any and extremely limited internet access I was unable to do this.

 

On my return I have found out that I now have a CCJ and the £800 debt is now £1000

 

1st question is,

this was supposed to be a strike out hearing, not the full hearing to decide the case

 

2nd The claimant failed to prove ownership of the debt or the amount claimed, why did they win this case

 

3rd why was I told everything would be ok by the court if i emailed before leaving the county and then stab me in the back afterwards?

 

I do not acknowledge this debt and the claimant still hasnt proven the amount owed so why has this happened?

 

would like to appeal but dont know how to go about this

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It sounds to me is if you filed an N244 but you didn't actually defend. Is this correct?

 

If that is the case then the reason that judgement was given against you is because there was no defence.

 

In order to deal with this you would have to apply for a set-aside which will cost you about £255 using a form N244 which you seem already to be familiar with.

Edited by Andyorch
fee corrrected
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Financial Legal Issues..please continue to post here to your thread.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

so we have the correct info and the background

can you please fill this out

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-2016**

 

and detail the letters you sent please

 

was this a CCA request to the claimant

and

a CPR 31:14 to the Solicitors.

 

did you file a defence or even defend all at the [aos] stage?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for your replies so far

 

yes I sent the CPR and the CCA forms

 

They failed to produce a statement of account (just one screen shot of a summary which didnt show the amount owing or how it occurred),

didnt produce the notice of default

and also failed to prove they owned the debt

(they just provided a screen shot of some computer screen which was just muddled up garbage!)

 

The original judgement was to stay the case.

 

I filled an N244 form out to strike out the case and ofcourse failed to attend due to a pre booked holiday (booked prior to any court action) which would have cost me more to cancel than what was being claimed

 

The court was made aware that I would be away on the date given.

I assume because I didnt attend I automatically lost

 

FYI the court still hasnt made me aware of the CCJ or that I lost the hearing, I have only heard today from the claimant

 

I did a bit of digging today and have filled in the N244 form again to set that case aside, I am using the help with fees since I am on a low income.

 

Now the hearing was on March 8th,

If I also want to / need to appeal the decision and go to the court of Appeal,

do I need to do this within a set time period from the hearing or do I need to await the result of the set aside application?

 

did you file a defence or even defend all at the [aos] stage?

 

Yes i sent those forms and also filed a defence saying I didnt recognise the debt as belonging to me or the amount being claimed

 

the case was stayed after this, but I guess i made a mistake asking for it to be struck out (or wrongly assumed the court would arrange a mutually acceptable date for the hearing! instead of saying heres the hearing date you must attend!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

but I guess i made a mistake asking for it to be struck out....

yep. and, it was your hearing and you didn't attend it

Link to post
Share on other sites

hard to attend hearings when you are 1200 miles away :)

indeed :)

but, you made the application re. if you cldn't attend then shld've applied for a relist.

not forgetting that maybe shldnt have applied for strike in the first.

shld've come here first.

anyway. hindsight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I did tell them several weeks before my holiday that the date was not convenient to me and the court gave me incorrect advice. As far as I was concerned everything was in order before I left on holiday but no because the court clerks gave me incorrect advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

my grounds for set aside are that I was out of the country at the time of the hearing and wasnt given the chance to represent myself. Also the Claim had no real chance of success (summary judgement)

 

then you can mention that 'incorrect advice', as and when if needs be.

but, your app'n now is re ccj set aside. what are the grounds for set aside....

 

this

 

"If you miss a hearing date that has been set by the court and you now have a court judgment or order, you can apply for the judgment to be set aside to allow a new hearing date to be set.

 

The court may agree to your application if you:

 

act promptly in applying to set aside the judgment (usually within 14 days);

explain that you had a good reason for missing the hearing, and

would have had a reasonable prospect of success at the hearing."

Link to post
Share on other sites

another question, the hearing I applied for was for whether the claim could be struck out or remain stayed

 

This wasnt supposed to determine if the money was owed or not

 

curious how the judge turned this hearing into the full blown hearing which was supposed to come at a later date

 

Also one last question, If my request for the judgement to be set aside is unsuccessful, am I able to appeal that decision at the court of appeal?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

If you don't turn up to Court, the Judge just naturally assumes you are not going to defend and makes the order in favour of the claimant. I would be appealing the CCJ to get it set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you got a defence ready ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

working on one at the moment,

 

initially it is I dont recognise the debt as belonging to me,

the claimant hasnt provided sufficient proof of ownership of debt,

the claimant hasnt provided statements to show the amount being claimed is correct

 

The claimant hasnt provided a notice of assignment etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am just going through the documents supplied by lowell for my court hearing tomorrow

 

Could someone please let me know what a Notice of Assignment of debt letter must contain?

 

They have given what looks like a cut and paste, there is no company header or address on the paper its just a blank sheet of paper with the Dear Mr.... on and signed by somebody

 

It says We have sold your debt but it doesnt say anywhere in the letter who "we" are ??

 

Also the default notice isnt included in the court pack.

 

The two letters they have included as letters to customer to request payment are the same as notice of assignment, a cut and paste job with no letter head and one doesnt even have the companies Phone number or address on

 

appreciate any help

 

I am going to say the notice of assignment is defective due to it missing the mentioned information,

it also has a different assignment date on it to other documents in the evidence bundle.

 

 

this alone should make it defective (it was also served to an address I wasnt living at , i moved away from the addres 2 months prior to the letters so I didnt receive any communication from lowell apart from the court summons which they managed to get my address right for

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am after a little help

 

Lowell Financial took me to court for an allegded shopdirect debt.

 

Originally it was in Northampton court,

where the judge ordered the case to be stayed as Lowell hadnt complied with the courts directions or supplied the required proof of ownership etc.

 

I saw the opportunity (stupidly looking back at it!) to apply to have the case struck out.

I was unable to attend the strike out hearing and judgement was made against me in my absence.

I have since applied and successfully had that order set aside.

 

I now have 2 weeks to write a detailed defence, which the Judge has asked me to do

 

My defence is I dont recognise the debt as being mine.

 

Lowell didnt provide a copy of the default notice in the court pack,

 

none of the letters (notice of assignment etc) were on headed paper so they could have been written by anyone,

 

they didnt provide full statements of account just a summatry which shows the transactions in the last 3 years.

 

The judge ruled that although these are were breaches of the various CPRs, they were minor and didnt have any affect on the case.

 

But as far as I am concerned Lowell havnt sufficiently provided proof of ownership

 

I am more than happy to email copies of what Lowell are using in court against me.

 

I really dont know where to start with all of this.

 

According to the judge in northampton there wasnt enough evidence to continue with a case yet I started the ball rolling again with the strike out request

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You already have a thread running on this. Please continue this on your old thread abd the site team will close this new one.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?475767-CCJ-from-Lowell&p=5008171#post5008171

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I am after a little help

 

Lowell Financial took me to court for an allegded shopdirect debt.

Originally it was in Northampton court, where the judge ordered the case to be stayed as Lowell hadnt complied with the courts directions or supplied the required proof of ownership etc.

 

 

I saw the opportunity (stupidly looking back at it!) to apply to have the case struck out.

I was unable to attend the strike out hearing and judgement was made against me in my absence.

I have since applied and successfully had that order set aside.

 

I now have 2 weeks to write a detailed defence, which the Judge has asked me to do

 

My defence is I dont recognise the debt as being mine.

Lowell didnt provide a copy of the default notice in the court pack,

none of the letters (notice of assignment etc) were on headed paper so they could have been written by anyone,

they didnt provide full statements of account just a summatry which shows the transactions in the last 3 years.

 

 

The judge ruled that although these are were breaches of the various CPRs, they were minor and didnt have any affect on the case.

 

 

But as far as I am concerned Lowell havent sufficiently provided proof of owner ship

 

I am more than happy to email copies of what Lowell are using in court against me.

I really dont know where to start with all of this.

 

 

According to the judge in northampton there wasnt enough evidence to continue with a case yet I started the ball rolling again with the strike out request

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

remember your app'n is re set aside.

so, you need to at least satisfy the requirements for such. (and maybe ask for anything else if appropriate) see the civil procedure rules for eg.

and if it is successful, and unless the j makes any orders otherwise, then the claim will go back to the beginning.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you sent lowells a CCa request and their solicitors a CPR 31:14?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...