Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lesley A
      Licensed breeder Puppy farm & genetically sick pups.***Settled***

      By Lesley A · Posted

      Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • slick132
      soccersixes chasing owed money

      By slick132 · Posted

      Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • NewsBot
      Why Virgin Money takeover may mean better rates for Nationwide savers - SYLVIA MORRIS explains

      By NewsBot · Posted

      Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • dx100uk
      Lowell/Shoes SPC Claim Forfar Sheriff Court - Old Newday Credit Card.

      By dx100uk · Posted

      unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • lolerz
      One Parking Solutions Windscreen PCN - private flat bays, share of freehold . - Durrington, West Sussex.

      By lolerz · Posted

      I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Default Judgement Against Securitas Security Services (uk) Limited *** Counter Claim Struck Out ***

letsmakeamark
 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2184 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

BazzaS

BazzaS

Posted
Posted
Question is why do companies ignore thier employees or even ex-employees ?

 

Still irrelevant to your claim. Their actions are done now, you can't make them change, only they can choose to do so as a result of events.

Focus on your case, trying to work out why they have done what they have done or trying to make them change (other than doing so by beating them in court) is wasted time / effort.

 

Why not start a thread in the Bear Garden where you can rant about how unfair they are, and leave this thread focused on the case........

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ericsbrother

ericsbrother

Posted
Posted

aye, but commomly these are at the court nearest to the applicant of the set aside if it is going to be decided on the papers. Objecting to a set aside is not that common a thing, it does happen of course, happened to a friend of mine who had a judgement in his favour set aside twice when the defendant failed to turn up of the court dates. The sod then tried to counterclaim for the costs of attending the third hearing but that was dismissed. This is why you need to see the set aside application and if you think their reason for applying is worthy of comment request a hearing. It may be that an order is made that your objection will be in writing only to keep costs down.

All hearings should be in your local court as litigant in person verses a company......most default judgments are usually granted a set a side hearing...then its down to the reason offered for not acknowledging or submitting a defence
Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted
aye, but commomly these are at the court nearest to the applicant of the set aside if it is going to be decided on the papers. Objecting to a set aside is not that common a thing, it does happen of course, happened to a friend of mine who had a judgement in his favour set aside twice when the defendant failed to turn up of the court dates. The sod then tried to counterclaim for the costs of attending the third hearing but that was dismissed. This is why you need to see the set aside application and if you think their reason for applying is worthy of comment request a hearing. It may be that an order is made that your objection will be in writing only to keep costs down.

 

Where to make an application

 

CPR23.2

 

(1) The general rule is that an application must be made to the court or County Court hearing centre where the claim was started.

(2) If a claim has been transferred to another court, or transferred or sent to another County Court hearing centre since it was started, an application must be made to the court or the County Court hearing centre to which the claim has been transferred or sent, unless there is good reason to make the application to a different court.

 

https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part23

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyOrch

AndyOrch

Posted
Posted
trouble is he won a default judgement so Northampton CCBC would be thei original court

 

Northampton simply transfer any applications to the Litigants County Court...Northampton is only a CCBC..they dont deal with claims apart from default judgments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
ericsbrother

ericsbrother

Posted
Posted

paperwork also sometimes gets sent to Wigan for some reason. However, you get the drift, a default ist really heard so you need to poke them.

The default judgement was made at The county court centre in Salford. The older system was much quicker.
Link to post
Share on other sites
letsmakeamark

letsmakeamark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I havent seen the papers recieved yet but apparently BBC Cameras were following the enforcement agents when they enforced the Default judgement. Will write up what the application says etc. Also apparently they are following this thread.

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
ericsbrother

ericsbrother

Posted
Posted

so, now at your local court? This is what it should be for an individual and a corporation regardless of who is defendant. You now have the opportunity to say why the judgement shouldn't be set aside. Stick to the facts and to the law, take your paperwork with you so you have written evidence rather than just oral. This is important when referring to other cases/bits of law etc, no-one will look them up as it is your job to make your case.

 

Basically of your papers were served correctly the fact someone in the company forgot to pass them on or didn't take it seriously enough to file a defence wont win then a set aside but you need to show procedure was followed by having a copy of the CPR's and be able to show that everything was done correctly by you and even after the event you did your best to get the matter sorted before sending in the bailiffs.

 

When did they start following this thread? That itself can show they know about the claim before the bailiffs got involved. You may need to ask the judge to get them to show their hand on this as I'm sure they wont voluntarily admit knowing and ignoring in the hope that you would run out of steam.

 

Then look into the facts of the case, they say they reckon they can get the claim overturned- on what grounds? Obvious one is they dont owe you the money so you need to show your figures and show why they are correct and the reason for suing is sound. May be they say it isn't a breach of contract but another matter that should be dealt with elsewhere so you need to show that correct procedure, lawfulness of claim etc. that mead reference to employment act etc. basically anything you can think of should be taken with you

Link to post
Share on other sites
letsmakeamark

letsmakeamark

Posted
  • Author
Posted

In their application to set aside they have stated that they were unaware of the judgement. They also claim they had no contact from me and they had no contact from the enforcement agents. However they managed to make a payment to the enforcement officer the day before they arrived to execute the writ. Also they claim that BBC cameras were also following the enforcement agents .

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
BazzaS

BazzaS

Posted
Posted
In their application to set aside they have stated that they were unaware of the judgement. They also claim they had no contact from me and they had no contact from the enforcement agents. However they managed to make a payment to the enforcement officer the day before they arrived to execute the writ. Also they claim that BBC cameras were also following the enforcement agents .

 

 

Have they put these in their application? If not : irrelevant.

If so, surely they still don't influence if they have made their application "promptly" ; and isn't that they key point on which you are basing your request that the court deny their application...

 

Don't get distracted by irrelevancies, and try to focus the court's attention on the key point(s) of law.

Link to post
Share on other sites
letsmakeamark

letsmakeamark

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Have they put these in their application? If not : irrelevant.

If so, surely they still don't influence if they have made their application "promptly" ; and isn't that they key point on which you are basing your request that the court deny their application...

 

Don't get distracted by irrelevancies, and try to focus the court's attention on the key point(s) of law.

 

Ok.

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
letsmakeamark

letsmakeamark

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Have they put these in their application? If not : irrelevant.

If so, surely they still don't influence if they have made their application "promptly" ; and isn't that they key point on which you are basing your request that the court deny their application...

 

Don't get distracted by irrelevancies, and try to focus the court's attention on the key point(s) of law.

 

Yes they have. Just reread what you have asked.

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
BazzaS

BazzaS

Posted
Posted
Have they put these in their application? If not : irrelevant.

 

Yes they have. Just reread what you have asked.

 

Good, as if you know what is in their application you have a copy of it to post up ......... so that a rebuttal can be derived (primarily focusing on the promptness [or lack thereof!] of their application......? )

 

surely they still don't influence if they have made their application "promptly" ; and isn't that they key point on which you are basing your request that the court deny their application...

 

Don't get distracted by irrelevancies, and try to focus the court's attention on the key point(s) of law.

 

New hearing date received for set aside application. See what happens.

 

When is it listed for?

Link to post
Share on other sites
letsmakeamark

letsmakeamark

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Good, as if you know what is in their application you have a copy of it to post up ......... so that a rebuttal can be derived (primarily focusing on the promptness [or lack thereof!] of their application......? )

 

 

 

 

 

When is it listed for?

 

11th August 2017

So whats cooking today ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ganymede

Ganymede

Posted
Posted
No order as to when reply is due in . Just waiting to get hold of paperwork to do a word by word thing.

 

There will be no Order as there is no official reply.

 

You can submit a witness statement opposing the application if you want.

Link to post
Share on other sites
BazzaS

BazzaS

Posted
Posted
In their application to set aside they have stated that they were unaware of the judgement.

 

Remind me : what have you received that shows what is in their application , and when did you receive it?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2184 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...