Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
    • Send them a letter of claim straightaway. No point hanging around. Given 14 days in the letter of claim and if they haven't paid you by then, issue the claim on day 15. The amount of time is more than adequate for them to get going. Post your draft letter of claim here. A look at. Then log onto the MoneyClaim website and start preparing your claim and post your particulars of claim here for us to have a look at. Don't bluff. No point in it.
    • That's what we thought, but the store manager is inferring that, as the jeweller we used was not a member of the NJA, no one  would give what he said, any credence. The Jeweller we used is in fact, a long established, well respected company, with 2 store and rather than just being a retailer, they craft the most exquisite jewellery inhouse!  I wish my Fiancé would have bought from them rather than H Samuel! Do you think we do need to get another report from and NJA accredited Jeweller ?
    • Really pleased that you won. UKPC know that you have supremacy of contract but still they persist because so many motorists blindly pay them.   Muppets.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lowell/bw claim form - old SimplyBe JDW CAT 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


blacksofa
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2401 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:thumb: Not all claims require a Skelly

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

All posted, special signed for delivery by 1.00 pm tomorrow. Next stop Skeleton Argument bullet points. Probably going to have the evening off!

 

Edited: Sorry Andy I posted the above before I saw your post.

 

 

I thought a Skeleton Argument was sort of my notes on the WS

- bullet points - to remind me of my main arguments?

 

 

At the moment I feel like I have read through that WS so many times that I'll be able to recite it

- but that will probably change in front of a judge!

 

 

What do you mean that not all claims require one?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Probably going to have the evening off!

 

Can I also :wink:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think you definitely deserve it Andy. I edited my earlier post but probaby too late for you to see it.

 

What do you mean that not all claims require a skeleton argument?

 

Was mulling it all over on the way to the Post Office

 

 

- my main legal arguments are (?)

Hearsay on their part,

Statute Barred,

No Default Notice,

lack of compliance with CCA/CPR requests (back up of suspect documentation)?

 

 

If the judge decides to go down the 'probabilities' route

then the probability is that with their hearsay documentation,

reconstituted agreement, terms, letters and very generic list of transactions, and a claim of a default notice which appears to not exist, that debt (if it exists) could belong to almost anyone.

 

 

Also there is a probability that,

realising the imminence of statute barred for this alleged debt,

they decided to have a last ditch effort to pursue the debt,

and recoup far more than they paid for it when they purchased it,

even though they were outside the statute barred timescale.

 

 

Am I on the right lines here, or is that too inflammatory?

 

Which reminds me...

I keep forgetting to say this,

but the debt has dropped off my noddle account at the latest monthly snapshot yesterday.

Wish I had remembered to say that earlier.

Link to post
Share on other sites

of no importance

just means the default reached its 6th birthday

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been so focussed on the WS that I just realised I don't really know much about the potential outcomes of all of this!

 

from what I can gather, the possible outcomes:

 

Discontinued by Lowell/BW before the date

 

On the day:

If they don’t turn up – dismissed/struck out (is there a difference) or ruled in my favour?

 

If they do turn up: dismissed/struck out; ruled in their favour; ruled in my favour

 

If dismissed/struck out/discontinued or in my favour, can I claim costs and if so do I have to prep this in advance?

 

Don’t want to spend time on it in advance unless I have to

, or if there is a real advantage,

 

as if I lose

, I will feel that I have given them even more!

 

I have had a look at a few threads re costs, but they mainly seem to be quite old.

 

There are references to special court forms for this,

but also some people seem to favour simply an itemised statement/list to take to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its small claims costs are fixed already in their POC

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have been so focussed on the WS that I just realised I don't really know much about the potential outcomes of all of this!

 

from what I can gather, the possible outcomes:

 

Discontinued by Lowell/BW before the date Unlikely given that they have prepared and served their WS

 

On the day:

If they don’t turn up – dismissed/struck out (is there a difference) One and the same or ruled in my favour? Hope so

If they do turn up: dismissed/struck out; ruled in their favour; ruled in my favour Correct

 

If dismissed/struck out/discontinued or in my favour, can I claim costs and if so do I have to prep this in advance? You have to ask the Judge best to have a rough figure ready

 

Don’t want to spend time on it in advance unless I have to

, or if there is a real advantage,

 

as if I lose

, I will feel that I have given them even more!

 

I have had a look at a few threads re costs, but they mainly seem to be quite old.

 

There are references to special court forms for this, Thats for Fast Track..your in Small Claims track

but also some people seem to favour simply an itemised statement/list to take to court.

Correct

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies DX and Andy.

 

DX - are you saying that I can only claim the same figure as they have indicated in the costs section of their POC?

 

Edited... they have listed £50 legal representative fees. Is that the amount I can claim? I think I'll be over that with stationery, postage, and travel/parking expenses alone, or can I not claim them?

blacksofa

Edited by blacksofa
Added some numbers!
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies DX and Andy.

 

DX - are you saying that I can only claim the same figure as they have indicated in the costs section of their POC?

 

blacksofa

 

No...thats the fixed fees for the claimant costs for issuing the claim......if they win they can ask for further costs.....which is at the discretion of the Judge.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

No...thats the fixed fees for the claimant costs for issuing the claim......if they win they can ask for further costs.....which is at the discretion of the Judge.

 

So I can claim postage and stationery costs then (with receipts) and mileage? and car parking?

 

What about this hourly fee for LIPs that I have read about (£18 or £19), Can I also claim under that? I don't think I could put on a claim for the actual number of hours I have spent on it, as that comes into £100s.

 

I have read that the max that can be granted by the judge is 2/3 of that which would be payable to a solicitor dealing with the case for you.

 

Any ideas on what a realistic figure would be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

And also £90 for a days work if you have to take a day off....have a rough tot up and you give me a figure your thinking of ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

And also £90 for a days work if you have to take a day off....have a rough tot up and you give me a figure your thinking of ?

 

OK Andy, will do, either later tonight or over the next few days (back to work tomorrow). I have read somewhere mileage = 40p per mile - is that still correct?

 

Not sure about the day off work issue - I have booked it as annual leave, so don't know if I can claim for that - bit miffed I have had to lose a day's leave though. (£90 a day would be nice, but I'm in the sticks and working in Adult Health and Social Care, so £60 is more like it!)

 

Blacksofa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes as far as Im aware...40p per mile

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So... came home from a long early shift at work, planning to spend the afternoon/evening writing out my skeleton argument and my expenses, to find a Notice of Discontinuance from BW.

 

 

Have rung the court and they have received their copy,

the case has been removed from the hearings list on Friday

and moved to the 'Dead Zone' which made me snigger.

 

Enormous thanks to DX and Andy for your help.

There is no way I could have achieved this without it.

Pay day on Thursday and although it won't be huge,

I will be making a donation.

 

Drinking coffee and eating doughnuts whilst humming 'Fanfare for the Common Man'!

 

Blacksofa

Link to post
Share on other sites

no Lucky Man...know the album well

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done Black....I guess the Witness statement was worthwhile.

 

Thread title amended to reflect the result........delighted for you.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...